Wood version. [image: 1756659284584-gus-robatto-coffee-wood-01-resized.jpg]

Yes..I sent him a message on the link you sent me..I will also contact Sketchup Thank you for the help

@Mike-Amos LOL

Thank you, mates, for your kind words. I know that there are plenty of spots to be developed and improved. But the goal was to show the process (at least partially) from a rough sketch on.

Hey mgash, What version of Rayscaper did you download? We only support SketchUp 2025 since version 0.9.44 and higher. [1] Regards, Thomas [1] Refer to https://rayscaper.com/faq/installation/#method-2-via-the-sketchup-extension-manager on how to check your version number.

@Leggy said in Annoying pop up: so just scale down by 0.001 then export and we should be spot on in mm No. As I wrote: said in Annoying pop up: No need to scale those models down. And as @Box wrote. I've shown examples like this before. The SketchUp model: [image: 1756390018225-53845887723_431de704e7_o.png] And the 3D printed object. [image: 1756390035664-53845887438_c3b7a0281b_c.jpg] No scaling of the model required. The .stl file was exported at Model Units (meters). but the slicer reads the dimensions as millimeters.

ah thanks rich - ill give it a try

Just select the Group from outside and launch TopoShaper.

@TIG Good and not-so-good news in your response: It's good to know you're already working on this, although a little sad because it won't be out anytime soon. I use this plugin in my modeling routine and enjoy seeing the report. Thanks for your response and great admiration for your work.

Water, energy, ai and mining craptic currency. We know how bad the situation on this, our only lifeboat is but business, gets to do whatever the chunk it likes while we get preached to and fleeced. THIS new emperors new clothes stuff is properly toxic.

@L-i-am said in Old model updated - Space fighter: HeY Bryan. I took the liberty of using AI to draw your design in the style of Syd Mead hope you don't mind . I am sitting on the fence about AI generally but your deign scrubbed up well [image: 1756291129798-mead-3.png] It does indeed scrub up nicely.

hi Didier Bur, May I request an update for this extension for SketchUp 2023 and higher? it work well with my SKP 2022 but file crashes when I use it in skp 2023 Many thanks!

Excellent work! Great modeling and renders!

This is something like the end result I am looking for. [image: 1756254625797-10-1000s-2067-x-1192-5618917-tri-25s-gpu-resized.png]

The earlier posts in this thread explain how to make a temporary fix by editing the RB file. В предыдущих сообщениях в этой теме объясняется, как сделать временное исправление путем редактирования файла RB.

[image: 1756166628689-festool-36mm-antistatic-hose.jpg.webp] its the dark blue part wrapped around the blade with the flexible tube coming off it

Bloody good mate.

@Einstein It's home made. I wrote it long time ago, but I remember that for the interpolation, I did not find anything suitable and usable for my level of math in the literature. For the upsampling of the triangulation, I remember that I tried the Steiner refinement approach, but it did not work well for what I wanted to do. So, I built my own method. I was not familiar with the butterfly subdivision algorithm and still am not. Maybe it is a more conventional approach.

I'm late to the party on this one, but I've been detailing in SU since version 2 (20 years ago!) and layout since it's first iteration (which was tedious). I've found that I tend to go down a dual route, depending on what level of competence I have in the contractor and/or the complexity of the build. I Scrapbook most of my standard details which are small SU files in the same folder as the Sketchbooks. This makes a lot of them nicely lightweight in LayOut too, and if there's a change in legislation I change the Scrapbook file accordingly. [image: 1755862424270-screenshot-2025-08-22-123201.png]