It is difficult to tell without seeing the model with the animation actually. Just attach it here if you can or PM it to me. Thanks.

Le premier n'est pas free mais il y en a d'autres sur le marché! Blender entre autre! On n'ira jamais sur Mars! [image: 1787848224108-gi_fly.gif] [image: 1787848233261-fly2.jpg]

First is not free but you can take Blender or other [image: 1787848224108-gi_fly.gif] [image: 1787848233261-fly2.jpg]

If you look at your error message it references SUClock 2.0

[image: 1787825756401-boatt.jpg]

There are still a few cases I have not yet covered for hip and ridge, but the current module should now cleanly handle about 97% of all complex roof configurations. I will now move on to the rafter framing. The introduction of raised fascia offset has caused some complications for the actual rafter framing. I now need to spend a few days unraveling that. [image: 1787821120318-truss_su1092_800.jpg] [image: 1787821126904-truss_su1093_800.jpg] The possible node configurations currently handled by the new algorithm are: HHR, VVR, VRH, HHHH, VVVVRRRR. Also the hip terminating at the eaves (corner or rake).

@Krass I import it to blender as glb and export it as dae to sketchup. It gave me the best results. sometimes glb are to heavy for SU to handle.

FredoPortrait essentially generates images, not scenes. For isolating components and views, it uses temporary settings of the camera and object visibility, but this is transcient. Generating scenes with isolated objects and specified cameras would be another plugin.

@PetterSketch Thank you, I was looking for the same thing. And yeah, Dave.... I am speechless, glad I scrolled to the end of screen.

And I feel compelled to emphasize—for users of true path-tracing renderers—that the denoiser really compromises image quality. You only have to test it yourself: even though Rayscaper’s denoiser is excellent, a 1080p render won't be particularly sharp or detailed. Paradoxically, simply increasing the render resolution actually saves time in the end; once displayed at a smaller size or downsampled, the result is far superior to simply increasing the samples per pixel (spp) at a lower resolution.

That composition of yours has had me thinking, a lot. With higher heat than in the past, in many of our regions - a series of covered walkways linking up the water features, would provide cooler spaces imho. Perhaps an extension of this plan would include this? Either way, your compositions always make me think and that I think, is your gift to us.

Sunny Plume https://www.instagram.com/sunny.plume/

There are rumors of reducing and tightly controlling interaction with the free world, including applying to universities!!!!. (And it goes like this: it usually starts with rumors, then becomes reality. If it turns into law, which is pretty probable, any disobedience has a punishment of 2-5 yrs in jail! This is crazy!!!!

@Jianming-Mo I think it is really cool

@Rich-O-Brien I have emailed the file to you. Please kindly check your inbox. Thank you for helping with the testing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAKxkIxUA6I

yes Pixelcruncher these solutions aren't a gimmick any more, I don't know if you're an expert in this field, but yes, absolutely. However, it's a real hassle to offer to clients—it requires massive servers... Free AI models are pretty good, but they don't compare to paid solutions. Zpix, by Samuel Tallet, is a free PC app that generates really decent images using open-source models. However, it's best suited for creating single views and involves a lot of randomness. I couldn't really use this image for my client, but I put it on my site... [image: zpix.png]

Geez, I would give anything to understand even a tiny percentage of what you guys are talking about

@rich-o-brien I'm old and I haven't had enough coffee this morning to wake up my rememberer. That's my story.