Hi, I used Chris Fullmers Center on Origin and than exploded it once and all was normal. Charly jumping sit eplan.skp

HI, Is there anyone able to help me in applying graphics on the can, but the rest of the can, it should be in aluminum. (Like REDBULL cans) I have something like this (left): [image: Mini_cans.jpg] but it has to be something like this but white should be cans color (right). It`s any video tut or someone can help me step by step?

Here are a couple of laminate textures that I have taken from http://www.krono-original.com/. Basically, I have used Krono's floor studio and taken a Print Screen, and then I have edited the image with Gimp. Also, I have used Bricks'n Tiles software to create seamless textures. Probably these textures are not usefull for professional use but for hobbyists they should be quite ok. [image: pgDp_Laminate_Aged_Pine_Krono.jpg] [image: 35Hp_Laminate_Alsace_Oak_Krono.jpg] [image: zoIn_Laminate_Ash_Valetta_Krono.jpg] [image: OX67_Laminate_Halifax_Maple_Krono.jpg] [image: 6tiC_Laminate_LongIsland_Oak_Krono.jpg] [image: QKQ3_Laminate_Moritz_Oak_Krono.jpg] [image: jO8S_Laminate_SanFrancisco_Pine_Krono.jpg] [image: d9j8_Laminate_UrbanLegend_Krono.jpg] [image: QZEe_Laminate_Oak_Bergen_Krono.jpg]

pryvit, vyhlyadaye zdorovo Spasybi. Hope I didn't mess that up.

Glad that worked. It's unlikely you'd have a problem with a single component but if you start adding a lot of parts to a model that all have a large number of entities, you will probably find the slow down.

I would like this functionality as well...

Yes! It works Thank you very much Gaieus!!!

What for? It's a common enough question to merit letting the world know about Eric and Daves Cordless Drill thread!

So aligning with the axis is like rotating on the axis. Sweet, thanks. Ya went through 21 zip cuts when it was all said and done haha. Had them laying around from previous jobs I have done or worked at. Now I have a new oxygen bottle, Im hoping it will be cheaper.

@draner5 said: bonjour, je rencontre un problème de lenteur avec sketchup pro 2014 avec un modèle de 57 Mo, ce qui est normal vue la taille; mais avec un autre modèle de seulement 700 Ko cela devient une éxtrème lenteur (plusieures minutes quelque-soit la commande utilisée) ce qui n'est pas normal vue la faible taille du modèle conçu de la mème façon que le modèle 57 Mo. Bonjour, Il s'agit d'un forum anglophone, donc s'il vous plaît poster en anglais, ou post dans le forum français. En outre, votre question est sur ​​SketchUp 2014, ce qui n'est pas approprié dans ce fil de discussion, ce qui est pour SketchUp 8. Néanmoins, vous devez savoir que la taille du fichier et la complexité géométrique ne sont pas les mêmes. Petits fichiers qui ont de grandes quantités de géométrie ou qui font usage de modèles sommaire de pointe peut être plus difficile à utiliser dans SketchUp que les fichiers qui sont grands que parce qu'ils contiennent des textures photo. Merci! Andrew

Perhaps if you posted the SKP we could comment more constructively... Sadly thomthom's SolidInspector2 and my own SolidSolver can't perform miracles, just fix schoolboy errors... There's a limit to every algorithm.

Since I am not getting any replies about subroutines, I did restructure again so that I can copy DC and make a few changes to produce a component that maintains distances. The example would work for a garage door ( using ASIN & ACOS for angles ). The calculations were adapted from http://local.wasp.uwa.edu.au/~pbourke/geometry/sphereline/ http://local.wasp.uwa.edu.au/~pbourke/geometry/2circle/ There are some weird bugs in sketchup when using large numbers, in addition to the SQRT problems. skyfish trackroller II.skp

@liam887 said: well then hopefully some of the ruby guys could write a little file browser to use within sketchup that would be great! That's a nice idea, but I don't think it would work, because the code has to be written within the app itself. It would probably be best just to badger Google more for an update in SU9.

@unknownuser said: Why not just share your solution here? I'm intrigued You are right!I am really sorry, it didn't sound as intended. Well,what "the smack" (ME) did wrong was pushing TAB to see if my geometry was correct and anytime I liked it, I exported the model to dae so that I could import it to SU. What I should have done was push D to subdivide the model, (TAB only gives preview of the subdivided geometry) thats why it kept on delivering the undivided model. Kind of embarrassing actually!!!! The thing now is that the dae file is quite big in MB. For instance the sofa you saw attached is 10.8 MB and without any texture. Guess that my inquiry is not over after all!!!!

You'd best check with Google directly.

Thanks For the tips guys.... I'll try both plugins... Jeff,the result you showed was just what I need.Much appreciated Thank heaven for all the plugin makers :O)

je suis d'accord avec Pilou. why would you toil laboriousy thru it in SU when another program could do it with more fluidity and then just import it? Not that I do any of that, but Just an observation.

Thanks, I haven't been on the forum in quite a while, guess I need to visit more often...

Here's my guess at last. If you look at the plan below the roof model, I started using the rear slope (7:12) to complete the front high roof as indicated in previous posts. However I thought this looked worse so I changed it in the model to be 12:12 all sides of the front high roof. I also dropped the garage roof eave in the model, as I think this makes the symmetrical part work better. However that requires that you push the door wall of the garage out a little (no big deal), so the resulting roof works with the master bedroom roof. I left the "terrace" uncovered. I think that is a better design and creates the roof ridge of the central 7:12 in accordance with the elevation (not so high). Besides the plan has a dotted line at the "porch" indicating it is covered perhaps and the "terrace" is not. I scaled off the graphic and I think my roof is scaled different than yours, but the concept is there. The top of the high front roof is not to be flat really. You'd have a low slope in four directions, but you'd not see it really. Or a skylight with a dramatic shaft in the great room. OK-- so I see in yours the high pitch is only on two sides, that makes the ridge for the front element work. That looks pretty good. I wonder though if you can make the lower roof each side of that have more ridge and be symmetrical, plan allowing, to create a better visual support for the high roof. Good luck. Peter House-plans B.skp