Hi there, 1. I think most of the issues you are encountering are related to the wall geometry not being in a component, so please make sure that the walls are in a component. Not in a group! And that the cutting components are placed outside of the wall component, and not on bear geometry. If you need to convert a group, that already has wall cutters on it, follow the 3 step workflow of: Remove Cuts > Convert the group to a component > Refresh. You can read more about the various situations where you would need the 3 steps: https://flextools.cc/learn/wall-cutter/#Advanced-Operations 2. Make sure all the wall face normals are facing out, i.e. if you change the model's style to 'Monochrome' all white faces should face outwards ,and colored faces should face inwards. 3. It could be that because the wall was a group (If I'm not mistaken), some unwanted lines were created on the bottom of the wall. Those can interfere with punching the opening through when placing the door all the way on the bottom. If after converting to a component you still have issues with a specific wall, it could be some of the lines are divided and hard to find. Best to recreate the wall in that area and refresh the component so it punches a new opening. When the wall is a component, it should work a lot better, without extra lines being left behind or other unexpected behaviors that you mentioned above of sometimes cutting and sometimes not. If you still encounter issues, please send us the model and we'll gladly take a look. 4. Regarding having open doors on one layer and closed doors on another, I understand the benefit and we will try to integrate an option for that in future releases. Currently, the solution is to select all the doors (you can also select components that contain doors, or select non-doors indiscriminately, or even select the entire model) and run the 'Open-Close' tool. It will open (or close) all the doors in one click.

Do you have the latest GPU driver installed?

I think it's because GPU rendering is fairly new technology comparing to CPU rendering, so i believe it's just a matter of time that will support every feature like in CPU.

@sigasiempre said: I'm having trouble understanding how to specify a path for an object movement. I've set up some curves by slicing a cone (conic section) and want to use the as paths for an object to follow. However, these curves don't show as paths when I try to set up a movement. I've attached a file with the curves and a sphere I'm trying to animate to follow these curves. You just need to make the conic contours TRUE Sketchup curve (with TIG Weld). Then they will apear as selectable pathes in Animator. Fredo

None I know of?

Ok, ta.

Great thanks.

@tig said: .... copying their RB and matching subfolder into the SketchUp...ShippedExtensions folder. This means that if SketchUp ever decides to re-copy these into Plugins, then you won't get the old version back ! Then you've got to remember to keep the plugin folder and the ShippedExtensions folder synchronized ! More headache

@cleeman10 said: Hi guys. I just downloaded a bunch of vismat files. When I open them in V-ray, the material looks different from the preview jpg included with the vismat file. When I open the vismat and see the preview IN v-ray (not the preview jpg) it looks different and much worse from what it should look like. It is a different color from the diffuse bitmap texture entirely, the reflection is out of whack... I don't know what's going on. It's like this for every vismat I just downloaded from vismats.com I've attached some pictures to explain my situation. Thanks in advance!!! It's a colour space issue. Go to the diffuse slot of the material and click on bitmap. Change the colour space from screenspace to linear space or vice versa. I personally, would prefer to go with custom gamma and specify what I'd like the material to look like instead. Usually a value of 0.5 works for me.

@matucaa said: hi, i'm starting to use sketchup vray 3.0 and i'm trying to use the cut tool to render it, but when i get it finish the image is not quite good. it has ghostly plains in the main section. in the pregress windows apears this txt : Scene bounding box is too large, possible raycast errors. some one knows how to fix it?. attached images in this post! [image: kqv05.png] [image: kqMba.png] good find. I'm getting the same glitch when trying to render 3D plans/ dimetric perspectives using section tool. Hope there's a fix for it.

Yup, I remember having read somewhere that SketchUp works internally in inch and it converts on the fly in metric for display... But I can't work in arch units, that's impossible, I'm too old for conversion now

I'm aware of the full BricsCAD workflow... that's part of the interest.

Judging by the description this should work with Sketchup also, so this would be the easiest option for SU to Unreal workflow, at least to ones who use Vray for rendering in SU?

Very clean result!

Thank you! I will try and tell you if it worked.

OK, this numpty has been banned.