Thank you! flatland it ain't

the smartdrop is so excellent !!! and the components seems to be very usefull too ! thanks a lot massimo

I haven't played much with the V2 beta, but you might find a quicker and more in depth response from other users on the Podium forum. They have good FAQ's and tutorials. The Podium staff may notice your problem sooner and respond as well

I don't think that repair_broken_lines.rb will close gaps. It looks like it just replaces collinear connected edges with a single edge. Sounds like an interesting problem. I'm surprised that there isn't a free script to solve it.

Thanks for the link rclub24. But, I think that's a little pricey for personal use. There is an architectural firm a couple blocks away http://www.a3studiotx.com/a3studio. I think they might have a 3D printer I can use.

I am thinking that one way could be building the whole shape (using Curviloft or the extrude tools by TIG), then create several surfaces (for example big rectangles) in order to intersect those with the whole shape. Then using JPP it is possible to extrude the right parts. I would like to use the Lattice extrude tools by TIG but it looks like difficult to manage in terms of frame. stef.

@thomthom said: @andre51 said: I managed to get a lisp routine to work in Autocad. You simply cross the contours with a fence line, input the lowest contour and the interval and the job is done in seconds. Thanks for the input TIG. By the way it is called chelev.lsp if anyone wishes to Google it. Sounds like a nice ruby plugin... That would be a wery nice plugin.

Many thanks for your help, Santiago. That video was very helpful. It does work in a way. I have all the geometry grouped now, but all in the same layer/with the same colour. So i have to merge the two files (the one with the geometry that has been cut and the one with the geometry in plain view) manually place each block in its respective layer. I need them in separate layers in order to change line widths and to keep it organized. This ammount of work would be similar to go crazy on boundaries on CAD, making it all on the correct layer from the simple SectionCutEdge layer. I'm starting to think i'll have to modify the SectionCut Face plugin in order to put things in their respective layers.

I like the B&W, perhaps as long as no one else does it, but how does it affect the product's performance? Sigh its 5:47am and I haven't yet got to sleep. Btw, Last time I looked, I didn't see a price tag. Bet that's harder to set then the color of the menu.

thanks for the news, great news!

From SketchUp to SketchUp? You can do it manually. Open the file you want to import. Select all the Layers (except Layer 0). Delete. You will get an option to delete the geometry or move it to the default layer. Choose to move it to the default layer. Save the drawing. Open the other drawing, import the file. It should come in as a component. Place the component on the layer of your choice. If you want all the entities in the component on this same layer, edit the component, select all the geometry, move to the same layer. I use this process when working with AutoCAD imports. Bring it into SketchUp, clean it up, strip all the layers, views, excess components, etc. Get it all on Layer 0. Bring it into my working drawing.

If i may add my two cents worth... I have been able to produce 'height maps' of terrain studies using a projected texture. This could basically be used on any 3d object Method: 1.Basically you create a color/grayscale gradient image in photoshop or otherwise, 2.Import into sketchup as a texture onto a vertical plane (rectangle) that represents the extent of the terrain. The vertical extent of this rectangle is more crucial than the horizontal. 3.Once you have the texture on the rectangle, go to the edit texture context menu and click on 'projected'. 4. Then sample the projected texture off the rectangle... choose all the surfaces of the terrain and apply. Voila! additional tips: A:Do not apply the sampled projected texture to a group, it will not apply properly. You need to assign the material directly to the faces. B:When making the vertical rectangle to represent the extents of your terrain it helps to overshoot the exact size a bit both top and bottom so that you don't pick up the extreme edge of the color gradient and start of the next tile of the gradient which can sometimes render as a dark colour. This can obviously be done with a grayscale gradient too which i imagine could be used to generate a displacement map (exported jpg from a top view) similar to what Dave R and jopsa2 have been talking about. Also in comparison to Chris's Color by Z plugin, although this is not technically a plugin, its avoids a multitude of generated materials, instead this one uses just one... so its Vray friendly too. Attached is a sample image for reference. Hope this helps. Dave [image: P1qU_heightampdisplacementmap.jpg]

Update to version 1.2 Previous versions started off each session with arbitrary default values in the dialog box for the Superellipse parameters. This version remembers your last dialog box values between sessions.

@bitttttor said: I'm wondering if there is any documentation regarding access to [OpenStudio] commands via the SU ruby console ... ANSWERED (by DavidBoulder) - in Developer's Forum: Re: access OpenStudio with Ruby console

You can delete your last post of a thread if there is not yet reply you can write [Resolved] on the title subject but your subject is always open For the rest send a PM to a moderator or administrator

I understand that is easier to convert a skp file into a file format supported by the cnc software than writing that code in sketchup .. The point is that when exporting from sketchup to other formats u don t know exactly what sketchup export,and usually u get lot of problems because the formats are not 100% compatible. U,probably, need to check them there as well .. So far i intent to use the sections i cut from my car to achieve the car shape manually in foam. It would probably be much better to start learning some cad-cam programs but they are too hard for me..and in sketchup i really feel inspired(that s why i still stay on it). Thanks! Elisei

http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?f=323&t=29377

I thought there would be known issues. This was last week in my classes. I do not have a MAC> I will email my student and ask her to do that and get back to you when I have an answer. Thanks much!

Yes, I remember your rubys and I was thinking to them when I said this could be doable. I don't think that I need a lots of rays, because I'm working on large landscapes, so I do not need a lot of precision. But As I don't know how it works, I don't know if you can control the rays the way you want...And if the plugin can be used for other purposes, maybe It's good to keep enough rays... Anyway the way you described it could be good for me : @unknownuser said: added a point on a surface and then 'joined-up-the-dots to make a 'seen_area' group I'll give a look again to your rubys. Thanks anyway.

It's easy to make a shape with 'all' concave faces that you want to face 'outside' so it'd fall over at the first hurdle[image: 5hyn_Capture.PNG]