Categories

• SketchUcation Community Forums

  • Extensions & Applications Discussions
  • Developers' Forum
  • Gallery
  • Resources
  • Corner Bar
  • Special interests
  • Other Languages
  34k Topics

  420k Posts

  P

  Oui effectivement pas besoin de mettre un roman ! merci pour la réponse.
• SketchUp Forums

  Get help using SketchUp

  • SketchUp Discussions
  • SketchUp Tutorials
  • SketchUp Components, Materials & Styles
  • SketchUp for 3D Printing
  • SketchUp Feature Requests
  • SketchUp Bug Reporting
  24k Topics

  186k Posts

  J

  Hello SketchUp Community, I want to share a workflow approach regarding the development of low-poly, heavy-duty dynamic assets engineered specifically for complex facility layouts (industrial design, crane operations, and regulatory clearance mapping). The traditional bottleneck when dealing with high-capacity equipment (such as bridge cranes and vertical cage ladders) inside massive industrial viewports is the massive dimensional drift and intense VRAM lag introduced by unoptimized geometry or broken nested group hierarchies. To bypass this infrastructure issue, I have been engineering parametric simulators using strict, clean native mathematical formulas inside the Component Options backend. The goal is to allow real-time mechanical interaction (X/Y/Z linear travel and vertical safety clearances fully compliant with OSHA regulations) without depending on heavy external ruby scripts or third-party extensions. I have deployed a raw operational viewport test showcasing the trolley travel kinematics and target alignment behavior in real-time under native software constraints: ► VIEWPORT PERFORMANCE & INTERACTIVE SIMULATION TEST: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nK0_ruktMS0&t=8s I would appreciate to open a discussion regarding the optimization of complex nested components. How do you usually handle mathematical boundary limits for component movement restrictions when stacking large architectural systems? Cheers! JOGAR
• LayOut Forums

  General discussion related to LayOut

  • LayOut Discussions
  • LayOut Feature Requests
  • LayOut Bug Reporting
  1k Topics

  11k Posts

  D

  Are you referring to Back Edges? If so, they don't appear in Vector rendered viewports in LayOut because they are a raster thing and Raster line work is not displayed in with Vector or Hybrid rendering. You can leave the viewport set to Raster render and see the back edges. A better way to show them or to show hidden features in LayOut with Vector rendering is to use a suitable style and select a dash style for the tag. With Stacked viewports this is dead simple and gives you better control over what hidden lines are shown and which are not. You have no control over that with the Back Edges face style. Example: [image: Screenshot - 10_17_2026 , 5_52_31 PM.png] [image: Screenshot - 10_17_2026 , 5_52_47 PM.png]
• Rendering & Subdivision

  No decsciption available

  • V-Ray
  • SUbD
  • Animator Beta
  • FlexTools
  2k Topics

  20k Posts

  F

  There is nothing like a generic batch rendering and video generatiion. Anyway, on a single computer, they would have to queue the jobs because there is one processor and graphic card. I don't know which rendering software you use. If it is VRay, there is now an option to generate the rendered video on Vray cloud, as well as a Batch option. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wy5DT1jKddc