@daniel said:
I wonder why "real film" and not digital? They are both nothing but a medium, but I would think digital would be so much easier for editing and distribution.
Film [media] is still considered the 'art', and the quality far superior, the major disadvantages are actually the 'shoot' day logistics, matching stock, waiting for rushes and clearances...
the majority of british films I have worked on use both, digital for high speed and super high speed action, film for dialog and majestic images...
digital is catching up...
both are expensive to do well, but digital can be done on the 'cheap'...
I have friends working on this series of films and they say that security is the most extreme they have ever encountered...
I do special physical effects, and a lot of these can be enhanced with digital effects, but not economically replaced... [ yet ]
john