@redinhawaii said: I asked the question, if I have "on every page" set as visible and active, can I modify it (in this case the title block) unique to THAT page, i.e. have a distinct number? Yes and lock it for That page on each page or is it just "global" all the time? No,It can be local (per sheet) and what would be the difference / application for having a template (in this case a title block) vs having the title block "on every page" what I found with the template was that when I clicked "additional page" within my title block template, I got the right sized paper but my title block did not carry over. What am I doing wrong here? You need to add a "duplicate page" not just another (blank) page........please ref attached image. red Red, Open any of the default LO title block templates and experiment with the add duplicate page (inside page) and see if these get you closer to where you want to be. Best, Charlie ![LO PC Screengrab of "add duplicate page"](/uploads/imported_attachments/5tRW_SP04.jpg "LO PC Screengrab of "add duplicate page"")

I've found it easiest to create multiple styles and control them in the various scenes, even turning them on and off in a window in LayOut looking at my embedded model. Styles can have sections on / off and the planes active or hidden. When you update your scenes it may ask you to 'save a new style'. I do this, then name is something that defines what it is / how it works. Once these are set - you can apply them to ANY window in LayOut - regardless of what scene / setting you originally set the model up in... I have 2 color styles with sections on / off and 2 BW hidden line styles with sections on / off. I can quickly (relative here in LayOut!) change the entire drawing from color to BW line art...

@jhauswirth said: I think the problem might be the same as the z-fighting issue. The dashed lines consistently render while in hidden line mode so I don't think it is Z-fight related. Are the lines on the same plane as the faces they are drawn on? Yes (in test file) Can you pull the lines up off the ground/faces by a very small amount and see how it looks then? I tried this (+ 1/8") and it did not resolve the missing line segmnets Thanks for you help on this, Best, C

Well, you could draw a scale in SketchUp, send to LayOut and make it Ortho with a scale (I chose 1" = 1', but this can be changed), vector render the model, add text labels in LayOut, and save as a Scrapbook called Scales.layout. That's what I did. Of course, you can create a prettier scale drawing, pick a better font, etc.. b [image: ScaleSBimage.png] Scale.layout

OK, I got it. It seems to work in relation to the handle that was just dragged. So if you pull a handle on an edge, you can only enter one value, for either the width or height. In order to enter horizontal and vertical dimensions, you have to drag from the corner first. Not obvious, but it does make sense. Thanks EJE for the fast reply.... EJE

Hi, I'm wondering if anyone has more plan view trees and shrubs for Layout they'd be willing to share with me. thanks, Keea

@unknownuser said: Hi Eric Am I right to say that if you modify the dimension of an element in SU, the related dimension created in Layout will not be updated? That's correct Bert, you have to go back and manually edit your dimensions. I think this is actually a smart way to dimension. There are a lot of "free form" CAD softwares out there that feature "automatic" dimensioning. They are not foolproof though. Typically, when I use those features, I get mixed results, and I end up switching them all to manual. If I can't trust the program to automatically edit my dimensions, I have to go check them all anyway... If you want to check out my blog entry, go to the first post in this email. That blog entry was also featured in the Google Sketchup blog a few months ago as well.

@jhauswirth said: [image: http://www.ombwatch.org/files/info/images/outlook.jpg] that´s very promising

Tim - in the file I just fixed, you couldn't get to the page with the offending view because it'd crash, because it appeared that the links to the model did a somewhat halfway update (or it updated raster views and not vector/hybrid views). We go in and look at the XML to see what doesn't make sense, but it appears to be all related to changing the model (adding geometry, having "Fix Problems" run on the SketchUp model - which is changing geometry, etc...) but then on TOP of that having some condition in LayOut that causes a failure to pick up the updates completely. Please submit files you get that are horked up, and we'll fix 'em for you. We're getting closer to a solution. Fortunately, this is fairly rare. In the mean time, save regularly (model and .layout). b

Hi Karen. I generate timber frame shop drawings with Layout quite extensively. What follows is my work flow; which I have developed with a bunch of trial and error. The key move is to make a separate SU file for each part of your system; great room, Master Bedroom, etc. I use this new file for my Layout work. I isolate each part of the frame that I want to dimension and I move them around in model space until I can dimension them and place them in Layout without seeing any extraneous members. I do all of my dimensioning in SU, particularly with timber frames because you have so many instances where faces aren't flush and you have to rotate the model to get the point you need, which is a royal pain in Layout. Once I have my new SU file, with everything dimensioned, then I can insert it into Layout and then navigate, in each viewport, to the view I want. I don't use scenes in SU, though this would make things easier, becaue I experience a weird and annoying glitch with SU where, when I hit my middle mouse button to navigate, it jumps to a scene. This makes it impossible for me to "work" a model with scenes, so I have figured out work arounds. So, the new SU file, when complete, is a mess of dimensions, and pieces all over the place, but everything far enough apart from each other to not interfere with my views in Layout. In your particular case, I would isolate the bent and dimension (at scale), I would isolate each timber in the bent, and give dimensions (not to scale as I display timbers isometrically), and I would have a scale plan view, with necessary walls, etc. Hope this helps.

OK, I think I can answer that: yes. Create your own template, and insert a dummy model (nothing in it but Sang), set to Ortho and set the scale in the SketchUp Model inspector (set the view you want, too). File->Save as Template. Now create a new SketchUp model, send to LayOut, and your model should have the correct view and scale that you want. It plays off of the blog post I wrote - http://sketchupdate.blogspot.com/2010/01/connecting-sketchup-scenes-to-layout.html b

Hi Orch, thanks for staying on this topic--you have succeeded in verifying for me what it is that I was doing (wrong) every once in a while, (like yesterday!) namely, losing track of the active section plane, especially in models containing a lot of them. And Gai-good tip to check their status before updating, mystery solved. ...And btw, I'm probably the last person standing to have finally found the "Hide in other scenes" plugin. (if there's a better one, I'd love to hear about it...)

There IS dimension constraint in SU! Here's an image to show drafting assistant helping me select the plane in which my dimension exists. [image: sample1.png] I wouldn't be expecting to find it in LO if it weren't in SU. I can see from your pictures that you didn't pull the dimension away from the geometry being dimensioned. IRL you never put dimensions right on the line being measured; it's illegible in the field. I'm not looking for this to be used in perspective, although the behavior should be consistent across the whole SU platform, regardless of what view you're in. Please do add this as a feature request. There are a lot of people trying to use SUPro to make construction documentation, including me. It's almost never useful to reference the hypotenuse of anything.

No, but that's an interesting request. I could see having a "use model drawing scale in measurements box" checkbox, but what if you have multiple models per page? You'll have to use the inference and then move lines - e.g. trace a line over a model, inferencing it's endpoints and then moving or rotating the drawn line if necessary. There are a lot of LayOut users that do this to trace over models in this way to put emphasis on lines. b

Being able to set the import dpi would probably be best. However, if Layout is expecting a certain resolution number consistently, I could adjust the output from AutoCAD as necessary. PNG images of black and white line work aren't very big so increasing the resolution would be OK for me.

File menu > New from template...

For now, the best you can do is to nudge one model with the arrow tools and then align just by eyeballing it. b

Can you explain how you think that's backwards? Once you know about layers, it seems right to me that the topmost layer takes precedence, and then items within each layer determine the drawing order. How would you do it? Thanks for any feedback. b

You can actually edit your SU lines if you turn vector or hybrid rendering on (the default is raster)* then explode the SU drawing in LO - then the model will act like deeply nested groups in SU so you need to double click to edit until you can select the individual set of edges. [image: http://lh6.ggpht.com/_zcvsIuYiVbo/S2pCbqJ1J2I/AAAAAAAADZg/5W9pPSpMj7E/LOShapeStyle.jpg] Note that this (exploding) is a destructive and irreversible operation which will ultimately beak the linkage between that particular SU viewport in LO and the embedded skp file so only do this when you know you are ready with the modelling phase. Of course, you can always delete just that exploded viewport and insert the skp file again - the model itself won't be affected this way. if you explode it while raster rendering is on, it will become an image that you can open/edit in an external application and it will instantly reload upon saving.

thanks gaieus that's exactly what i want, strangely I think I have used that in the past so feel a bit silly. Anyway thanks for your help much appreciated.