I'm sorry I have tried that .. but that is not what is in my mind.. I just want the text to follow the line even if I move one point only . . doing this manually is possible.. but not for ruby scripts I think..

Hi John, many thanks for your quick reply. It was really helpful. I am now using the command line of winzip in my Powershell script, as you have proposed. The generated RBZ file is now working on my MAC also. Thanks a lot for your help. Sonja

great - that's what I was looking for anyway

**It works!**Thanks a lot, you saved my weekend!

The code is good. From the console it appears that the first run was ok, and then you ran again the script and the face cannot be created. The problem is that you are trying to create a face object in the same place occupied by the face created before. Clean all your objects first (select all> delete), and try again.

inner = [[211.304795230314, 59.3387335473855, 144.121274015103], [198.016313479612, 93.8459200290483, 144.121274015103], [198.016313479612, 93.8459200290483, 209.586476052542], [211.304795230314, 59.3387335473855, 209.586476052542]] outer_right = [[123.368393800971, 287.689711452616, 222.214015434512], [124.599206984753, 284.49356753989, 222.214015434512], [124.599206984753, 284.49356753989, 7.04087985299685], [123.368393800971, 287.689711452616, 7.04087985299685]] outer_bottom = [[123.368393800971, 287.689711452616, 0.0], [123.368393800971, 287.689711452616, 7.04087985299685], [124.599206984753, 284.49356753989, 7.04087985299685], [278.931403899607, -116.27229864223, 7.04087985299685], [280.16221708339, -119.468442554957, 7.04087985299685], [280.16221708339, -119.468442554957, 0.0]] outer_left = [[278.931403899616, -116.272298642254, 222.214015434512], [280.16221708339, -119.468442554957, 222.214015434512], [280.16221708339, -119.468442554957, 7.04087985299685], [278.931403899607, -116.27229864223, 7.04087985299685]] outer_top = [[121.306929034951, 293.042869957925, 227.414539710024], [201.765305442185, 84.110634448818, 323.731055308166], [282.223681849419, -124.821601060289, 227.414539710024], [282.223681849419, -124.821601060289, 222.214015434512], [280.16221708339, -119.468442554957, 222.214015434512], [278.931403899616, -116.272298642254, 222.214015434512], [278.931403899616, -116.272298642254, 227.414539710024], [201.765305442185, 84.110634448818, 314.768300386351], [124.599206984753, 284.49356753989, 227.414539710024], [124.599206984753, 284.49356753989, 222.214015434512], [123.368393800971, 287.689711452616, 222.214015434512], [121.306929034951, 293.042869957925, 222.214015434512]] # place bounding faces temp_group = Sketchup.active_model.entities.add_group outer_right_face = temp_group.entities.add_face outer_right temp_group.explode temp_group = Sketchup.active_model.entities.add_group outer_bottom_face = temp_group.entities.add_face outer_bottom temp_group.explode temp_group = Sketchup.active_model.entities.add_group outer_left_face = temp_group.entities.add_face outer_left temp_group.explode temp_group = Sketchup.active_model.entities.add_group outer_top_face = temp_group.entities.add_face outer_top edges=temp_group.entities.grep(Sketchup;;Edge) temp_group.explode ### edges.each{|e| e.find_faces if e.valid?} # place a textured inner face temp_group = Sketchup.active_model.entities.add_group inner_face = temp_group.entities.add_face inner temp_group.explode ( material = Sketchup.active_model.materials.add("Red") ) unless material=Sketchup.active_model.materials["Red"] material.color="Red" # make 'red' once only inner_face.material = material ### # inner_face.erase! ### alternative # inner_face has lost it's material puts inner_face.material This works. It adds a face within the overall form too. The 'window' is colored after the explosion. Note how I also only make a 'Red' material once. You could erase the 'window' instead of making it 'Red'... The order of operations and exploding groups affects the result, but knowing that you can avoid it.

On the PC, send_action can process native tool command integer IDs. I pub'd some IDs here (but do not use that file as is. It mods the API.) Just use it for tool ID reference. Somewhere here Thomas also posted a tool ID hash. Ex: Sketchup::send_action( 24201 ) # Union Tool

That's for that revised version!

Your error message pointed to the last line in your code: classify (u, apoint, face1) I suspect it was the space between the method name and parentheses. Especially when you encounter syntax error it's good to go over your code and make sure the code style is consistent. Checking that there are no spaces between parentheses in method calls and making sure you have parentheses around all arguments etc.

Sounds like you need to implement a custom Tool: http://www.sketchup.com/intl/en/developer/docs/ourdoc/tool You can make the tool select entities the user clicks on by using the PickHelper class. Both these classes has examples in the documentation that will get you started.

From a time complexity perspective I think the problem is inherently O(n^2) (which means that your code can't be any simpler), also, if the curves have few segments and you already know enough to throw away half of them, then I would say your code is probably close to optimal. In general, the simplest way to gain speed is to use bounding boxes in various ways like reducing the input to segments in the bounding box intersection between the curves and so on, however, there are constant costs associated with this so it may not be a gain on small inputs.

Ah, yea - there is name and display_name - at least in the Ruby API. name is the unique one that should be used to refer to materials. display_name should be used only to display the material name to the UI. However, it appear that the C API doesn't quite do that. Let me have a chat with the rest of the team.

I can reproduce what you see when I use a larger texture. I also notice that the Console output is odd. lots of empty lines and a strange order of the lines. I'm not sure what it is yet.

did you have a look at http://sketchucation.com/pluginstore?pln=InfinitePanOrbit I did a mac hack to help out with it, is that the kind of thing your after? john

@lersince1991 said: Hi, I am trying to use this but all the textures are out of scale completely (254mm x 254mm) and lose their aspect ratio. Is there any way (I dont know ruby script) that someone could modify this rb script and give it a prompt for material scale and for it to maintain the aspect ratio? Old discussion: http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=180%26amp;t=17857 Original rb download link: http://rhin.crai.archi.fr/rld/plugin_details.php?id=241 Much appreciated! You can specify a size, width and height, but not a scale. If you are interested I can PM you a copy which allows size input for each texture.

hi guys, situation is the same with sketchup 2014? i want to make a toolbar with organises approx. 50 tools (each tool is simply the link to a dynamic component). A drop-down menu in the toolbar would be I think best solution. Just like the one what appear in "Getting Started" toolbar. I dont want to make the equivalent in webdialogs, it is possible but i think it would be a mess. please, any ideas?

@sr20vet said: Yep, I've taken the native threads path. Got the thread running, got even an http server running in that thread. But now, GIL is killing me. Can't call ruby from that second native thread... May I ask what exactly you are trying to do? I think you can call ruby from that second native thread. One important point is that the ruby function needs to be involved in the ruby thread, i.e. the SU thread. So in the c-extension there should be two threads, one is the same SU thread, the other is your second native thread. All ruby codes need to run within the SU thread.

To recap. Component definitions can have attributes. These apply to the definition and are therefore accessible via definition.get_attribute(...) Component definitions can have entities, These entities can have attributes. These apply to the entities with the definition, and are therefore accessible via some_entity.get_attribute(...) Component instances can have attributes. These apply to the instance and are therefore accessible via instance.get_attribute(...) If you have an attribute set for any entity that is within a definition.entities context, then that attribute is accessible all instance.definition.entities - i.e. it is the same attribute, and therefore if you ' .set_...' it, it affects every instance sharing that definition - just as if you had painted a face 'red' inside the definition you should expect every instance to show that subsequently.

nope, I have not copied, create the object there. There are also problems when making copies when it is inside a group or component nonorthogonal... is very strange behavior you describe (google translator)

I have looked further and I can confirm that zero length strings as keys will cause this. Nil values will convert to empty strings. So as a workaround until we fix this bug please validate the key provided to set_attribute.