Looks great, Hector.

Looks good, Majid, but you have the architrave beyond the abacus of the Corinthian capital, which is incorrect - and just looks weird, IMHO. In the classical orders, the architrave should line up with the neck of the column below.

Kudos, though, in that your columns themselves appear better proportioned than those in the actual space.

Impressive modeling, sir.

Great job, Jason. The little girl in the 5th image appears to have a bit of a halo around her.

@jiminy-billy-bob said:

@tobobo said:

Fox News

Omg, what a load of crap. Are these "journalists" really that ignorant, or are they just trying to scare the american people?

Both.

Those are some big-ass rabbits.

You appear to have the rendering part down, but need to work some more on the composition.

I remember years ago, with another less than optimal computer, I increased the virtual memory just to increase the size and quality of exported images from very large models; other than that, I don't remember it improving the speed of SU.

Do you have groups and components? You might check to see what layers your individual model elements are in (including elements within groups and components). You may have inadvertently moved them to, or modeled them in, the wrong layer.

Well, I guess your not perfect after all - that's way too clean and organized for a student. And where are the empty beer bottles? If it weren't for those glaring mistakes, it'd look great.

A commercial that's just a wee bit suggestive.

edited: Solo

It's excruciatingly perfect. I hate you. ( )

I was always under the impression the Farnsworth House used glazing for the exterior walls.

It's obvious you're using the same plant components again and again - the same orientation and size. Try randomly rotating and rescaling them to give the appearance of variety.

Its hard to offer informed criticism of your design without understanding it fully, as in seeing the plans as well.

The tricky part would be the last leg and the rings on either side of it. but it could probably be done by a dexterous person with practice. Hell, there is probably a machine that can do it.

@jeff hammond said:

@hellnbak said:

Very nice work!

One question - how do you get all those rings thru the legs?

i think it's actually do-able.

the rings would be split at one point around the circumference.
bend them open a bit..
slide all the legs on the rings.
put the horizontal piece in the leg slots..
spin the legs around the circle into position..
the ring seam is hidden inside one of the legs.

looks good @carsten.. really liking the osb texturing

Or, the holes in the legs do not go all the way through, and the rings are actually individual curved rods between the legs. Given how thick the legs are, and how tight the holes are, it might be hard to slide the legs around the rings.

Nice model and rendering, Cotty. I think your design looks better than the original.

I can see where that would appear misleading, since it refers to the previous order which already had a discount, and resuming that order. However, it doesn't say an "additional" 30% off.

Frederik, was there a place in the email to click on that took you to their website, or did you just go to their website and then apply the discount code? I frequently get such emails - usually if you click on the banner in the email or a specified link, it takes you to a dedicated page on their website that explains the particulars of the discount.

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission rules state that contingent conditions and obligations of an offer must be set forth clearly and conspicuously at the outset of the offer. A lot of companies use "fine print" to do this, but technically that does not meet the FTC's rules.

Looks great, good use of the sketchy style. I'd get rid of the red SU logo - it kinda draws attention.

Looking great, Hector.
(and still working on your project)