@mitcorb said: Hi, zun kian: If you are in a hurry, perhaps create a large rectangular plane group bigger than the foot print of your model. Position the plane at the vertical elevation at which you wish to cut. Intersect plane with model. Delete all above plane. Of course, some of this model may be components, and this would be another level of complexity to deal with. I would probably save the model as a new version and work on that one. Thanks mitcorb will try that if that's the only way it would help! zunkian

lo puoi scaricare da qui http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?f=323&t=31906&hilit=ribbon#p281416 you can download it from here http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?f=323&t=31906&hilit=ribbon#p281416

TIG Thank you for the reply. For some reason yesterday, I couldn't get back on this site. Ken

I wondered this a few years back when SU got 3d Text, if it can do fonts why not shapes, imagine a shatter or asteroid (like in the 70's game asteroids)shape font.

I think this might do what you want ? http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?p=360335#p360335

I want sun right inside my house at moon. How about that. COuld you also position sun in a room as light source?

The plugin created in response to this request has been posted. http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?f=323&t=40627

Thomthom has also posted a set of free tools to clean up CAD imports and there's a paid tool or two on Smustard.com...

and for select all segments with a length given By Chris Fullmer

great !

Just to add to the list, LightUp (http://light-up.co.uk) performs realtime Solar analysis all from inside SketchUp (in the same Window). Here's a realtime capture of it in use comparing Summer and Winter insolation. [flash=640,480:3897kuqs]http://www.youtube.com/v/jxPyMvI_EqI[/flash:3897kuqs]

Ten steps to get your data points of a true spline curve Download Bezierspline by Fredo6 Complete set of polylines and splines curves commands: create, modify, convert. Cubic Bezier spline curve2, Uniform B-Spline, Polylines, modification of precision, add/delete control points, support of loop closing, conversion of any curve to spline curves, language translation support (French, German, English, Hungarian, Portugese). Doc included. Download Silhouette to Plan. by TIG Flattens (projects) the selected geometry onto the selected workplane. edges are inspected and only those that are needed to form a fully faced 'silhouette' WITHOUT cut-outs are retained. Use tip 1 runing more than one sketchup. http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?f=79&t=40254 Run 2 copy of sketchup - two click of the shortcut. Make your shapes or objects with Bezierspline and Silhouette (per #1 sketchup). Select curve (per #1 sketchup). Paste in place to empty page GUI (per #2 sketchup). Sketchup a) Export file.dae (per #2 sketchup). b) Meshlab.exe convert dae to wrl. or SketchupPro Export file.wrl (per #2 sketchup). Open file.wrl - Notepad. Read your data points.

You can only use entities.add_instance() of a definition, BUT there's no built in group.definition method , BUT all components, groups and images are all just types of instances of a definition. To find a group's definition you have to find its entities' parent which is the definition - so defn = group.entities.parent ComponentDefinition just as the much snappier method defn = instance.definition does for a component-instance ! The second argument of the entities.add_instance(defn, **tr**) is the transformation used to place/manipulate the new instance...

You can buy me dinner

Thanks! I knew I wasn't crazy....

JointPushPull by Fredo. Read the accompanying manual under the Tools menu.

Great, thanks guys those are great plugins!

first one is xformclone.rb second: I don't know (i didn't find it in my database)

Well, these aren't really panels. It's stucco/eifs with joints so the subs don't care if there are 3 sizes or 30 because the joints are located on site. It's not like a cement panel where a form needs to be made and they need to be modular. Regardless, I have no influence on this. The fact is there is very little constancy. What you're describing seems to be the best method without a ruby. Once some simple modeling is done, a ruby is unnecessary true, however it's quite a lot of simple and repetitive modeling, which is what ruby's tend to excel at. If you had the option would you do it your way? Or would you bring in the CAD drawings, run Make Faces on it and then run a Make Bevels script on it and be done? -Brodie

Method 1 is similar to how I would've done it, except that I would rather make a vertical row(column) first, because that would make it easier to select (unless it is a very tall building).