Here is my solution selectionObjectTemp = Sketchup.active_model.selection.to_a if selectionObjectTemp.length == 0 selectionTemp = nil else selectionTemp = selectionObjectTemp end if @definitions[definitionAImporter] definition = @definitions[definitionAImporter] else composantPath = File.join(@libPath,"#{definitionAImporter}.skp") if File.exist?(composantPath) definition = @definitions.load composantPath else UI.messagebox "le chemin n'existe pas; #{composantPath}" end end if selectionTemp != nil selectionTemp.each{|entitie| if entitie.is_a? Sketchup;;ComponentInstance entitie.definition = definition end } end

Echoing my response here from the other thread: Not sure about the intellisense. Unsure how Sublime handle that. As for the debugger, I think it should work if you can find a package that let you set up remote debugging.

You have started another thread and I've replied there. I know you do not want to trigger it depending on a selection - I just used that as an example... In the example you show the other buttons are not disabled. When one is active it's shown 'depressed', when another is click that takes the focus and appears depressed. It the other buttons were actually 'disabled', then they would not be clickable and you'd never get out of the first clicked button's state !

If you want an example on how to set up the debugger in RubyMine you can check out this thread: http://forums.sketchup.com/t/please-help-me-to-setup-de-debugger-on-rubymine-for-mac/289/2?u=thomthom

We've checked it out. This is old hat really. We still have to trace off the geometry to form editable Revit families. Here's the solution to the problem of SketchUp to Revit. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQJFxCTey5E

I see this thread is almost ten years old, but has this issue ever actually gotten fixed?

You need an API for UVUnwrapping then... hm... Maybe something WrapR might consider? (pinging Rich)

::sleepily opens one eye:: hmmmmm?... this sounds like someone is dabbling with scary things...

@exmole said: I see this was posted 10 months ago. Did you ever figure it out? I have the same issue. Unfortunetly, not yet. Will try to get someone at Trimble to look at it.

Sorry for the delayed response. It looks fine, thanks again! [image: TtoBovE.png]

Unless you're still using SketchUp 7 or 8, you don't need this; and even if your are, you still probably don't need it. What problem do you wish to solve by running this code?

Unfortunately even with your adjustment, the code does not work yet. When I launch SketchUp, nothing happens. And the "Ruby console" shipments this error message : @unknownuser said: Error: # <TypeError: no implicit conversion of nil into String> Or is the error? See you soon. David

HE SHOOTS HE SCORES! That fixed it - thanks so much!

And Yep with your code that works like a charm! The mystery is why that works for you and Solo for the original and not for me! Have you a secret resizing? [image: BxlF_sdm_measures.jpg]

I have some experience using SketchUp & Unreal, not Unity. It could be some sort of collision setting (use the actual mesh of the stairs for collision instead of its boundingbox - this is what I have to manually do in Unreal for stairs) OR increasing some step setting allowing the user to 'climb'. Simple google search results in: http://forum.unity3d.com/threads/how-to-get-a-rigidbody-player-to-walk-on-any-type-of-stairs.133573/ https://docs.unity3d.com/Manual/class-CharacterController.html

This method only works when format is set to decimal (or engineering which is also decimal) in the model info. If fractional or architectural are used '1.2.to_l.to_s" returns '~ 1 1/4"' without any decimal separator.

@dan rathbun said: I believe this was implemented in a cross-tab of checkboxes by Martin Rinehart. Thanks a lot! I had a feeling that I've seen it somewhere already; apparently I just can't google the desired result .)

Groups are implemented as a special case of Components. They add some convenience methods that expose some aspects of the associated ComponentDefinition, and also a "lazy uniqueness" mechanism. By that I mean that when you copy a Group, it behaves just like a Component does - another instance is added to the ComponentDefinition. Only when you perform some action on that requires it to be unique does SketchUp clone a second ComponentDefinition and wire the Group to it (same thing as the make_unique method does). Any other copies remain associated with the original ComponentDefinition until you also alter them. For Group copies, it is a one-at-a-time thing.

If you are using the Ruby API, Geom::Transformation.translation followed by Geom::Transformation.rotation.

If the DLL does not have Ruby interfaces, then you will need to load and use it via the Ruby Fiddle library. http://ruby-doc.org/stdlib-2.0.0/libdoc/fiddle/rdoc/index.html http://ruby-doc.org/stdlib-2.0.0/libdoc/fiddle/rdoc/Fiddle.html