1. yes
2. yes
3. stats
   UI:Command objects: 337 of 1000 (33.70%)

Hi Thom!
Unfortunatly those toys grey out my right click menu (or in more ballanced words deleting of all toys
files\folders solve this problem). Could you take a closer look at the issue?
I need them badly
Thank in advance.
P.S. I'm talking about the last version of the toys + lib.

The frog, HDRIs and the site itself are superb!
Thank you Rich!

And meanwhile in Japan:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjHUmH601Gg&feature=player_embedded

@schorradt said:

No feedback?! I am looking forward to your opinions

Well sorry if I upset you but this manager is rather useless IMHO. Why?
Because your model is itself a manager of your 3d elements. And if you'd turn on "show the hidden geometry" mode you can easily select\unhide\view it's properties without any additional tables.

@thomthom said:

@rv1974 said:

This tool is essential for those who send files with repetitive components to 3ds max.
Unfortunatly only after removing this tool I solved the "grey out menus" problem. Is there any chance to update it?

Have you updated your FredoLib files? I think most the issues lied within that library, not in the individual plugins. (with an odd exception)

Yes I used latest lib pack (not 100% sure). Today I'll try it once more

Hi fredo!
Please take a look at this:
http://www.scriptspot.com/3ds-max/scripts/ant-stitcher-fast-and-easy-way-to-connect-two-meshes-in-3ds-max
If only you could add a similar feature it'd become a mega hit!

This tool is essential for those who send files with repetitive components to 3ds max.
Unfortunatly only after removing this tool I solved the "grey out menus" problem. Is there any chance to update it?

1.extrude line
2.extrude along path
3.mirror

http://www.stellarium.org/
enter your location and then place it as background into SU

How could I kill this new marvellous feature? I have 2 PC and on one of them this process is starting by default every time I open an existing file.

Hi! I have hard times trying to copy or simply select the punched components. Could you improve it?
P.S. A science fiction request: Could it punch on multiple feces or at least corner windows (2 faces)?

punch.skp

Hi Tig!
Coud you take a look at attachment. The script actually ungluesthe windows

nopunch.skp

Is there some way to separate shadows pass?

http://greegw.deviantart.com/gallery/

After this Photosketcher fever look at raffinated and close to perfect watercolor skill.
Too bad he makes them from photos (Camera distortion and motion blur seen on some works) but still impressive!

Hi!
Would it be possible you implement some 'putting to order' utilities disscussed here: http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?f=323&t=26013&hilit=material+replacer
(the 3rd post from the page end)? Though I wouldn't mind to get it with standard mateditor
I waited something like this with '8' but among many others gaps totalmente nada

@thomthom said:

Though, it could be made to also rotate the axis to match the current model axis.

That's exactly what I meant

One more thing:
Could this script stick to the current model axes not absolute world?

@johnsenior1973 said:

@jpac said:

If you are unhappy with SU free, buy Pro. If you are making money off this program, buy Pro. We vote with our money. THAT is an effective way to keep SU going, not complaining.

I'm underwhelmed by the release of SU8 Free. I've played around with it for a little bit, and I do think the introduction of colour imagery from GE is a good thing and the process will be made easier, but I don't think there's very much to be excited by.

But tbh the suggestion that people unhappy with SU8 Free should then go on buy the even more underwhelming SU8 Pro is utterly ridiculous. I'm disappointed by SU8 Free and wish it could have been better, but there's no way on earth that I'd toss Google $500 in the hope that the extra sales will spur them to make improvements. I don't think the world works like that. I think if Google knows they'll get enough sales with minor improvements then that's all they'll do. The best way to "vote with our money" is to not buy the pro version because then the message will be driven home that it doesn't offer enough for $500/$100 update fee/

But the problem is Brad Schell baby went out too good. Good enough to cover the thumbs twiddling of 70 people for 4 year period