I wish you were SU product manager it'd be entirely different world.

Superb!

@jbacus said:

@rv1974 said:

"No one will need more than 637 kb of memory for a personal computer." -Bill Gates, 1981
"64-bit processing will have no benefit" -John Bacus. 2010(sic!)

Be polite. I'm making a more complex point than you're giving me credit for making.

john
.

=======
'I don't think ordinary users will see any benefit from a 64-bit SketchUp'-
http://www.deelip.com/?p=2643
Being responsible for your sayings\deeds (or lack of deeds)- that's what I'd call to be 'polite'

@jbacus said:

@rv1974 said:

"No one will need more than 637 kb of memory for a personal computer." -Bill Gates, 1981
"64-bit processing will have no benefit" -John Bacus. 2010(sic!)

Be polite. I'm making a more complex point than you're giving me credit for making.

john
.

=======
'I don't think ordinary users will see any benefit from a 64-bit SketchUp'-
http://www.deelip.com/?p=2643
Being responsible for your sayings\deeds (or lack of deeds)- that's what I'd call to be 'polite'

You decide (though I see a bunch of rubies that do insert here and there cpoints without too much''people"
protest). The main thing for me that cpoint at pivot would be a part of given component.

@rv1974 said:

2.Wouldn't it be smarter not split into 2 commands?

It'd not be between center or bottom center, it's be between any corner, and center of each of the bounding box sides. So it'd be a lot more options than just two.[/quote]

I'm afraid I don't unerstand you. Anyhow what I mean is moving pivot to bottom center + placing cpoint
to the same bottom center within one ruby (command) would be better.

"No one will need more than 637 kb of memory for a personal computer." -Bill Gates, 1981
"64-bit processing will have no benefit" -John Bacus. 2010(sic!)

1.Fine but could bottom center be default value? Or at least make script to remember last preference.
2.Wouldn't it be smarter not split into 2 commands?
P.S. Not concerned to the topic:
You made some nice ruby 'groups to components'. But After the procedure it deselects the new born component. Could it keep the selection on?

Hi Thom!
Could your make your genious tool even more genious?:

1. Axes to the component's bottomcenter;
2. Add CPoint at pivot (there's no snap to pivot in SU unfortunatly)

Mr. Bacus answers remind me the interviews the north korean coach gave on the last Mondial.
The last 3+ years of SU development look exactly like 0:7 'Massacre of the Innocents' from Portugal.

It smells like we should expect a great rebrending in the nearest future:
11_selection_toys, 11_cc, 11_lib..

@thomthom said:

You're missing a file Win31API.so?

Thanks! 32 to be exact.
For those with the same problem:
http://supodiumforum.websitetoolbox.com/post?id=3137635
(post #4)

Error Loading File Organizer.rb
no such file to load -- Win32API

Any suggestions please!?

North tools, solids, fixed shadow\toolbar bug, better fbx export, no X64 :

• Good pont release .

IMHO To become a useful script it must have some 'snap to the bottom center of selection' ability

A bug: with no object selected it acts like undo command

Thanks God I'm not epileptic

http://www.sxc.hu/browse.phtml?f=search&txt=man+bike&w=1&x=0&y=0

It's clear that Zbrush lays in the completly diffrent niche
I'm talking about being innovative. The last time Skechup amazed me was many years ago.
Except an amateurs plugins the programm development is in adeep stagnation IMO

http://www.zbrushcentral.com/showthread.php?t=090818
Could any of the future basecampers show this to the SU team?