Simple Artisan examples collection
-
Can you do something about the marked areas? Looks a bit strange to me having those stray edges, even though it does form a quad. The large triangles could possibly be avoided too, don't have time to look though.
-
I was simply copying one of the provided examples, but I'll see if there is a better way of doing it.
-
-
@olishea said:
Try using circles with 6 edges instead of 8. When you intersect a 6 sided circle in half with a line you get two halves of quads, if that makes sense.
Good point....that's a great tip
-
@olishea said:
Can you do something about the marked areas?
Is this any better? It generates much neater topology but the poly count goes up.
-
Or how about this? Here I've rebuilt the form using 6-sided openings...much more economical!
-
Two versions of a simple cylinder with a bevelled edge. The second version (bottom) is for situations where you can't get away with a 6-sided shape.
-
Too many poles. 3 and 5 sided converging quads.
-
Last one for today: joining two pipes of the same diameter.
This one is significantly different to the reference as I couldn't figure out how to join the pipes without distorting the bottom pipe and making it non-cylindrical (see circled area).
-
@rich o brien said:
Too many poles. 3 and 5 sided converging quads.
Presumably that makes it difficult for UV mapping?
Edit: I was obviously over-thinking things again...
-
Yeah you nailed it with CylinderWithHoles-V3. Sometimes you think there is no other possible way of doing it....then you come back to the model and think Ohhhhhh! Great examples and thanks for posting here!
Your pipe is better than the example. The area you circled is an N-gon.
I guess the reason they did that was to reduce the "pinch" of the pole that you have in your model. They should have used another loop though. I love subdivision modelling; so many different outcomes from very subtle changes. 
Would be cool if we had a "circularize" plugin for sketchup, you could click on specific rectangles and convert them into squares. Or maybe create an offset square face within the rectangle. Would be nice to be able to specify how many edges so you could even offset a triangle, square, pentagon etc etc....
This would help creating circular holes in peculiar shapes. I use this tool in Wings 3D quite often, maybe I'll ask TIG about it....maybe call it Offset Circle where you can choose the amount of edges the offset circle has.
-
@olishea said:
Yeah you nailed it with CylinderWithHoles-V3. Sometimes you think there is no other possible way of doing it....then you come back to the model and think Ohhhhhh! Great examples and thanks for posting here!
Thanks
@olishea said:
Would be cool if we had a "circularize" plugin for sketchup, you could click on specific rectangles and convert them into squares. Or maybe create an offset square face within the rectangle. Would be nice to be able to specify how many edges so you could even offset a triangle, square, pentagon etc etc....
This would help creating circular holes in peculiar shapes. I use this tool in Wings 3D quite often, maybe I'll ask TIG about it....maybe call it Offset Circle where you can choose the amount of edges the offset circle has.
+1 Definitely sounds like something that would come in handy.
-
David and Oli, fascinating as this is, I think you might be going a bit off-topic, as in "Simple Artisan examples".
If this were to be hived off to a separate thread, you would find many lurkers and contributors I reckon, but I find it a bit complicated for my poor brain.What about a new thread called... "Extremely bloody complicated Artisan examples with lots of esoteric technical terms"
Sorry
-
@hieru said:
Presumably that makes it difficult for UV mapping?
It can when you try to relax the UVs around poles because the quads are unable to form square shapes.
-
@baz said:
David and Oli, fascinating as this is, I think you might be going a bit off-topic, as in "Simple Artisan examples".
How can you get more simple than cylinders and pipes?
Unfortunately you have to use some jargon. I hate it too.
-
Should I delete "Simple" in the topic headline?
-
@olishea said:
@baz said:
David and Oli, fascinating as this is, I think you might be going a bit off-topic, as in "Simple Artisan examples".
How can you get more simple than cylinders and pipes?
Unfortunately you have to use some jargon. I hate it too.
Point taken, perhaps a link or info on some jargon busting, Geometry for Artison 101?.
For example 'N-gons'??? -
polygon or tri-gon = triangle
quad = 4 sided polygon
n-gon = more than 4 sided polygon (replace n with the numbers of sides) -
Into to subdivision modelling and associated jargon:
-
@cotty said:
Should I delete "Simple" in the topic headline?
No, because these are still relatively simple. I think it was just the jargon that was getting out of control.
Advertisement