@unknownuser said:
@unknownuser said:
Adding the ability to run scripts as well is high on our priority list, and this will be added in the future.
Now they are talking!
You B3D/ formZ folk, don't overlook Russian based Ledas' Parametric plugin and engine either! Parametric ability would be something really great, you would have beaten SpaceClaim (although I highly suspect that SC is a bit of a formZ clone), to a Mac version of the software.
You're not alone. I found Doublecad rather slow too. Apart from the very ACAD like interface, I didn't really know what all the fuss was about. You may like to have a look at Ribbonsoft's Qcad. It's basic, but everything is in there that you need plus it is very cheap to buy. After playing with Doublecad for a while, I quickly returned to QCad, because I know it can be very fast to work with, once you know where and what all the tools do and where they are located. QCad also has a very easy to learn command line data input field- two characters are all that is needed to call up the different commands. I'd love to also recommend ilkesoft HighDesign, and PowerCADD 8, but they only work on the Mac.
You may like to navigate yourself to the Siemens website. I don't know if the offer still stands, but Siemens/UGS were once giving away copies of Solid Edge 2D too.
@chrisjk said:
Somehow I prefer the Queen as Head of State to President Brown...
Why?
I'm not a big fan of any current politician, but why replace them with that old dragon? 
Personally I would rather see the British Monarch disposed of, got rid of. They are a massive expense, and waste of British tax-payers money (and at the moment, the average British tax payer is screwed). As for that prince charles bloke, he should be stripped from his authority immediately. Several important building and architectural proposals across Britain have been scrapped because of charles, with his backward and highly conservative opinions, being allowed air.
I know some of you Americans have rosy views of britain's monarchy, but they just aren't as 'romantic', or awe-inspiring, as you make them out to be.
This is a classic example of why I don't get on that well with Mac Rhino. There is no history (yet). Once you've made, say a fillet like the one above, it's impossible to correct later on, without redrafting the whole corner again. Does FormZ have a history? What about Bonzai3D? (I've been paying too much attention to importing SAT files to notice 
)
Stickies, which originally and still does, come free with Mac OS, was another free app that all schools should have on their PC's. I mentioned it to the IT crew at Wolves. They just looked back at me as if I was trying to do their job better than they could! This freeware PC version is brilliant- highly recommended!
If you were designing a building where perhaps it was windy every late summer (Rome? Rome gets pretty windy in the late summer!), this could be really useful if you wanted to direct the air current away from an area that you needed to sit out in, and enjoy the late sun. Just an idea. In sustainable technology, CAE really comes in handy for finding exactly how much you need for strength but how little you would need to make something cost effective. For example, using certain types of costly metals. You could also discover where a model would need extra strength etc etc. Mind warping stuff, but great if you like a bit of maths now and then! 
@unknownuser said:
I do agree to use whatever works. They all have pluses and minuses. More Acad users so more support (if you need it) and more jobs out there as well at times. PowerCADD makes great looking drawings, HighDesign can as well. To each there own.
Yes, sorry missed that part too!
You are absolutely right. I can use ACAD, so if I have to work at a workstation, for someone else, I have no choice, after all, it's the money right? But as an individual, I will always use an alternative. I'm really against cracked software (that would be the other argument), so I buy what I can afford. Highdesign is superb, but PC8 is up there with ACAD architectural desktop imo- a total bargain.
@unknownuser said:
- Apple 24" Display = $899
please, don't make me laugh!!!!!
Who in their right mind buys an Apple 24" display??? Not to mention an Apple keyboard (actually they're quite good 
) and an apple mouse (yuck - buy a logitech trackball marble- I love these mice! )
My monitor is an NEC 2070NX which cost me £60. My trackball, £10. I have a (luxury) bluetooth Apple keyboard that cost £50, but I also use a PC-line keyboard from PC world that cost £5.
PowerCADD 8, Sorry I meant HighDesign- whoops. 
(But I still want PC8!)
So what's that...
£420 +
£60 +
£10 +
£50 +
£5 +
£349
= £894
Still cheaper than a seat of AutoCAD LT.
PS On sugar high this evening. Pancake tuesday! 
@unknownuser said:
You seem to like to twist words a little. I was and am not bashing Apple products...please read my posts carefully.
I have owned my own company since 1990. So I think comparing me to a "cash converter or pawn shop clerk " is a little off base.
Oh come on. Where is your sense of humour? There I was giving it the emoticons on every line- relax!
What period did you own an Apple computer? An Apple IIe running mapplesoft basic? Mac's have really come on since the days of Mac OS 9 and early OSX. Even software for Macintosh is cheaper than the Windows equivalents! (It did used to be the other way round).
@unknownuser said:
Your introduction of drawing standards BS 1192 has nothing to do with anything I said. Drawing Standards and .dwg is a standard drawing format in the architectural industry, are 2 different subjects.
Yes I know. That post was merely pointing out that one does not have to follow industrial software standards to achieve drawing standards. My point is, and I know it is also your point too, is that it doesn't really matter what you use, as long as another party understands it. If you want to keep everything electronic, then dwg is the way to go. But why always choose AutoCAD? Why not Revit for e.g.? Autodesk have a very powerful marketing department. The way they work, isn't unlike that of Dassault Systemes either, who want everyone to believe that CATIA and Solidworks are the future for product design. It's endemic in British universities and it's mainly all marketing nonsense. Solidworks are really good at locking you into a system, their system. There is NO dwg export facility. Importing a DWG file into Solidworks, is very basic and, (Solidworks and Autodesk do not like each other very much it seems) discards the ACIS data, so you have to more or less start from scratch. Autodesk are trying to do the same- oddly Autodesk even lock out their own products- like Revit versus AutoCAD for eg! There should be one standard that all parties can read, but Autodesk are very good at playing silly buggers with the dwg format, and this is wrong.
As a designer (and photographer I may add), I work part time, because I also have young children. I'd probably be able to afford a nanny if I had RIBA status, but I don't, I'm only a 'technician'. But I am self employed, and I don't have enough income to buy a seat of AutoCAD, so I use alternatives where possible, even pencils and freeware.
@unknownuser said:
as far as PC vs Mac as the platform to go with...call or talk to any architectural firm in your area and take a poll of what platform they use and what software they use.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not a PC versus Mac person- I use both, but I like to have a choice- it's democratic. I've already done a survey of different architectural firms as part of my degree, of what software they use, and I have to admit that you are quite right, many, do use AutoCAD LT (many also use SketchUp, Vectorworks and Archicad too- only one used Architectural Desktop), but only because they were either given the software (LT), or had received it as a free giveaway on the front of a magazine. Many were still on R12!
@unknownuser said:
I owned an Apple computer....used it for 6 months....sold it....simple. Did not love it...did not hate it. It simply was not for me. No bashing or twisting comments. I just said I liked their sense of design....never commented on any lack of functionality.
I apologise . I am just used to (tired of) people who find Mac's, feminine in appearance, and 'not for the boys'. At university I was disallowed to comment on a comment made by one of the lecturers (who was a 'Dr', and not a very good one at that either), who said Mac's were better suited to graphic design than engineering- utter crap of course. Therefore I sometimes get a little over protective, of what I consider a very powerful computer!
@unknownuser said:
As far as asking the question about "do I really like using the command line?" It doesn't bother me. I rarely us it. Use shortcuts mostly....and getting used to the "ribbon".
Yes the "ribbon". I find it a right pain in the a**e. I want everything neatly in order, from drop down boxes (like the Mac), in one place, in front of me- not a ribbon I have to keep scrolling back and forth to get at. I really hate the ribbon!
@unknownuser said:
Do you use AutoCad....
Yes, I have used AutoCAD. As a matter of fact, I was trained on ACAD Architectural Desktop as well as Solidworks. When you get out into the real world, people aren't using these packages generally, because they are too expensive. But they use LT because it is cheap- but my point is, because of this (I suppose like why Microsoft Windows is the world's most used OS too), designers don't change, they just stick to what they have got- this is a real shame.
@unknownuser said:
(please take no offense at my question....just wondering) If not ....what do you use for your architectural projects?
Please don't laugh, but I use Ribbonsoft's QCad (which I am also very ashamed to say, is an almost carbon copy of R12! ). But again, QCad works on all platforms. QCad is very inexpensive. It is also portable, so it can be used on any PC/ Mac or Linux based workstation. It's identical across the board so I can work anywhere on whatever computer- and have no problems with translations. Developers such as McNeel Associates are writing proper software, how both Microsoft and Apple would have wanted it (.NET and Cocoa), and the great thing is that both apps talk with one another- although the Apple version is still in alpha/beta. Autodesk' AutoCAD is Windows only. I hate that, because if forces you to use a specific format, and that format only. AND they do the same with their dwg file format. It's very wrong to keep changing the goal posts! 
I am seriously considering purchasing PowerCADD 8, because it is mind-blowingly great for a 2D application, and it IMHO, offers better tools that those in AutoCAD. The full version costing one quarter that of ACAD arch desktop (and no costly service pack updates). In my experience, 2D is still king.
Then again, I could just go for a pencil and paper? Mike (who I work with from time to time) works with Birmingham City Council, and they don't seem to mind the old pencil versions to the dwg's
I also use and love SketchUp!
@unknownuser said:
Read the post carefully....where did I say that "software does the designing"?...please just discuss or argue with points made in the actual post....and as a matter of fact....I do shoot with a Nikon SLR (F3 & F4) and a Nikon DSLR (D200) and Sinar 4x5 ( F series and P series)...but thats a different discussion
I used to own a Leica M6 and an M2 with 21 and 35mm lenses. I now have a Lumix G1 and an LX3, and a Nagaoka (Tachihara) 5x4 field camera too. My favourite was the old Yashica FX-3, which I still have, and working too) my mum gave me back in 1982.
@unknownuser said:
I merely stated that AutoCad or any clone producing the .dwg format would be a good choice for the poster. Several other people here seem to agree. The poster even said that his clients used AutoCad.
Yes I agree- until someone comes up with a better alternative. There was a couple of years ago indications that the pdf was going to be the new standard- with the Adobe 3D pdf and all that. But where has that disappeared to now?
@unknownuser said:
take a pill and chill out....but more importantly read the posts and be open to different points of view other than your own...
all opinions should be welcome....right?
Okay. I'll just stay off the extra morning coffee!
@unknownuser said:
Using Caedium add-ons you can create any 2D or 3D geometry or import your geometry from another CAD package. Then simulate how a gas (e.g. air) or liquid (e.g. water) will flow over and through your geometry
WOW!
More reading here;
@bocomofo said:
If you want to be seen as professional, produce good looking work, well thought out and speak confidently about your schemes. How you get there shouldn't matter.
I think this quote should be part of everyone's SCF signatures. Well said!
News from late last year, but about time, and still worth a read, if you are in Britain!
@mike lucey said:
Why does AutoCad have to be the 'standard'?
Indeed!
It should also be pointed out, and I apologise, as I don't know what the equivalent standard is in the USA or other parts of the world, but the British Drawing Standard on this is covered under BS 8888:2004 (product design) or BS 1192:2007 (architectural draughting). It is up to the individual to provide drawings to these standards, preferably also in 3rd Angle for product design, and a mixture of 1st and 3rd for architectural draughting, but how they arrive at producing drawings to these standards has nothing to do with using AutoCAD as a standard!
For example, a child could draw a number of lines in ACAD, and although the lines, probably a 'house with the sun setting and pretty flowers growing in the foreground' would be aesthetically pleasing to one's eyes, ACAD would not object to this! In fact any vector based application (including felt tip pens and crayons) could draw to BS 8888:2004 & BS 1192:2007!
I think I've made my point clear?
@martinrinehart said:
I've looked harder and seen that there is NO Mac issue. It's a Windows-only problem.
That's heartening to hear! The amount of times I've heard windows developers moan that there is a fault, and it is Apple's fault!
@utiler said:
Exactly, Pete. It looks way too easy.
And self healing geometry when inserting components??????
My wish for SU4, and SU5, and 6, and 7, and.....
Google, are you listening? There's anew kid in town. Are you gonna let those boots walk right over you? 
@cadward said:
Hey tfdesign
Hey cadward.
@cadward said:
I have had experience with Mac platform....
Have you now?
@cadward said:
I found it interesting...
a-huh... and..
@cadward said:
but not as friendly as Mac supporters have claimed....
Right. Not friendly? Okay. That's usually the answer I hear from people who work in pawn shops like 'cash converters', people who have never actually used a Mac. So, in what way? How do you mean? Isn't windows a 'pale copy' of Mac OS anyway? (or Apple's GUI, a copy of Xerox Parc, as some like to say?)
@cadward said:
I love their sense of product design....
So a Mac is about 'looks' like rather than 'function'?
@cadward said:
did not like their pricing structure....way to expensive...
Expensive? Sorry, but that's another popular Mac myth. A top of the range Macbook Pro is cheaper than a top of the range Dell laptop! And better built! You can also buy a very well specified Mac Mini for £420. What about the price of AutoCAD? Do you consider ACAD cheap? I could buy both say PC8 and a Mac Mini for the price of a seat of ACAD LT! 
@cadward said:
I took the approach of choosing the software that I needed to start my company.
Yes. Likewise! 
@cadward said:
If you are into architectural design...PC is the platform to go with.
Nonsense. Utter nonsense. Next you'll be arguing that is because there is more software available for PC's (more software, more training and, and I fear, more learning costs, less productivity etc)
@cadward said:
That being said...I really do wish PC's were more concerned with product design....but when you come down to it...the look or shape of your computer really doesn't matter...
Ah! So you do think that Mac users choose Mac's because they prefer their looks?
@cadward said:
Unless you have a designer office that you wish to show off....
There you go! You reckon it's all about the 'pose factor'? I'd be a millionaire by now if every person who said that, each gave me a fiver!
@cadward said:
it's the software you use that matters...
Yes, but not always. One of my colleagues, Mike, still prefers to use a pencil and a photocopier! I don't think Mike's pencil has ever even had an OS update, not to mention half a dozen of those security updates that occur each week. And as for the yearly service pack update, the 'update' costs about 30p.
@cadward said:
I personally do not like AutoDesk's pricing structure....
No I don't think many people do (and it is exactly one of the reasons that I don't support Autodesk!). But what makes this reasoning any different from those so called "high Apple prices"?
@cadward said:
But they do offer a very good product that is one of the architectural industry standard...
"one of the" ….."standards"…..a huh
@cadward said:
if you can find a good AutoCad clone...go for it...
Why would you necessarily want yet another clone of AutoCAD? What a shame that not a lot, in the world of 2D, because of such "industry standard" dinosaurs, such as ACAD, have ever bettered the genius of Ivan Sutherland's SketchPad at MIT, in the 1950's (<---click on link!)
@cadward said:
I personally have been using AutoCad since 1990....
Yes. It shows! Do you really like that command line?
[quote="cadward":2qcoemgz]
and my business has benefitted from my decision....[/quote:2qcoemgz]
So what you are saying is that software does the designing, instead of a good designer with an 'ounce of talent'? Hmm that kind of logic, is like saying, "purchase a Nikon, because it will make you take better pictures"?! Nonsense!
[quote="cadward":2qcoemgz]
but if you can find a software that offers more...go for it...[/quote:2qcoemgz]
It's not really about more in a software, it is about productivity, and using a Mac at that!
[quote="cadward":2qcoemgz]
Just remember to buy one that offers good product support.[/quote:2qcoemgz]
Pah! No comment! FWIW, Apple's support is rated among the best in the world. Try getting good support from Autodesk and while attempting to avoid a remortgage of your home and possessions!
[quote="cadward":2qcoemgz]
The bottom line is to choose the best software for your business,,,then buy the computer that supports it.[/quote:2qcoemgz]
Of course! So, what was the point of this last post 
Patience Gai, patience!
Students do have the chance to download SketchUp at home too you know? It is free! Matt could always demonstrate SU from a laptop and projector if absolutely necessary, until SU has been installed on the PC's (which I imagine are all clone workstations?) There.
The bureaucratic IT manager speaking within me!
Never mind what the future may have looked like, how about what it sounded like (or at least what it was going to sound like- to some)? Some excellent weekend, or after pub viewing to be had here- and check out the designs used on EMS front panels- ala 2001 A Space Odyssey? 
The EMS Synthi was England's answer to the American Moog synthesiser. Much of the Dr Who series was created using this technology. What's even crazier is that one guy called Robin Wood, still builds them out of his garden shed in the capital of Cornwall, Truro!
[flash=425,344:2oowgnjc]http://www.youtube.com/v/YtktHPCoYgw&hl=en_GB&fs=1&&[/flash:2oowgnjc]
[flash=425,344:2oowgnjc]http://www.youtube.com/v/msK7wL3Vr3s&hl=en_GB&fs=1&[/flash:2oowgnjc]
[flash=425,344:2oowgnjc]http://www.youtube.com/v/IlHtp3Nw9Mo&hl=en_GB&fs=1&[/flash:2oowgnjc]
@cadward said:
The Dwg format is by far the most requested format for information transfer with a client or contractor.
That's absolutely true, and I cannot deny that one bit, BUT, AutoCAD LT does not run on a Mac, without Windows installed!
But why again, are we having even more suggestions from people who haven't had any experience of other platforms apart from PC's, even though the original demand was for that of a Mac based system?
Right. Okay. Here goes. The hard sell.
It is rather unfortunate that developers such as Engineered Software's PowerCADD 8, which is also fully compliant with the DWG/DXF format, and built 100% for OSX only, is pushed out of existence for the likes of Autodesk et al. Read the testimonials, try the demo, try Wildtools set, which make sketching in 2D fun!
I've experience of self inflicted alopecia, trying to get AutoCAD Architectural Desktop (LT's bigger brother) to sketch a simple helix. Further adding insult to injury to then taper that same helix, I threw in the towel. Wildtools within PowerCadd are an extremely powerful set of tools (I know, as I used PC7 before I did my degree) that allows you to do just that, amongst many other things of course, with ease.
Here is a list of many of the other functions available within PC8 while using WildTools;
Here's a list of what other architects and engineers have to say;
And lastly, I suppose that's almost it. Ultimately of course Lene, it is up to you. I too run my own business, and I have chosen to use Mac exclusively. Admittedly I do also own two PC's, but I am constantly frustrated at how developers for Windows don't always stick to standards, and when updates come, you then spend the best part of a day working out why a commonly used function has either been moved or called something else. As for that nasty "ribbon", now present within many a Vista and windows 7 application? Give me a break!
I've ditched Autodesk and Windows because despite what people say, there are alternatives out there, to the so called " de facto standard", and here I offer another real world DWG alternative that runs on Mac.
