Pete, there is lots of material in the Star Wars fiction that continues the story after ROTJ, so Disney won't be hurting for ideas. There's also lots of material that predates the movies.

Does this mean Disney is analogous to the Dark Side?

I'm looking forward to it; I've enjoyed the movies, and the animated "Clone Wars" series.

wow. they look incredible.

It's a photo!

Another job well done, John.

Nice. The cornice bracket on the red brick building onthe right is wonky - shouldn't be able to see the left side of it from this viewpoint. Also, the floor inside the shop looks like it is running uphill, compared to the sidewalk.

Beautiful modeling. Thanks for the tutorial.

Congrats on your first two commissions. Nice images.

@tadema said:

Daniel , see I told you the small details make a difference.
Oli, thanks.

John

Yes, but the only people who probably notice the details are the people who do this, either for a living or as a hobby

Lovely.
But, I'm worried about that crack up the side of the building - has anyone told the homeowners about it?
That, and the supernatural fence posts that appear not to cast shadows.

Nice rendering/model, sketchy.
It seems, to me, that the lighting in the background is overkill, everything in the back of the kitchen is washed out.

Thanks Sergio. I'm almost through with the front elevation, but I've put it on hold temporarily while I work on something a tad bit easier; the IP has been frustrating to model at times.

Nice design and render, Oliver. You might want to adjust your shadows - the step up in the stone paving around the glass walls doesn't read too well. How/what would that roof be constructed (to get such a thin profile)?

Fantastic work, John.

That timbering! It's like looking into a kaleidoscope!

Nice one, John.

your model, images look great, Iulian. Effective use of sketchy style.

@mitraniulian said:

ok no problem dude , what you think about this work that i posted?

I think in sunglass-wearing frog speak, = bloody awsome = fantastic

Love the view point; shows botht he facades and the landscaping.

YOUR WEATHERED STUCCO LOOKS GREAT

No, I don't understand what your point is. Why are you using the pythagorean theorem in the beginning of your argument if it doesn't have anything to do with it? What exactly is your argument? The step lines are not always two units long - in your example, where the original triangle was 1meter x 1meter (and the unit being a meter), when you divided it with 2 "steps" the step sides where 1/2 meter, not 2 meters. And when you divided THAT again by half (4 "steps"), the step sides where 1/4 meter. Also, your argument wouldn't work for a right triangle of unegual legs; for a 3-4-5 right triangle, no mater how you divide it, the sides will always have 3 to 4 proportions.

Tig, your argument has two errors: one, you start with one unit of measurement (meters), and then switch to an ambiguous "unit"; second, the equation you use in the second and subsequent examples (1/2 x 4 = 2) is not the pythagorean theorem.

If using the theorem, and units, consistently, it holds true: