sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    SketchUp 2015 Wishlist

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved SketchUp Feature Requests
    sketchup
    75 Posts 39 Posters 42.0k Views 39 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • N Offline
      numerobis
      last edited by

      I will quote myself from last year...

      @numerobis said:

      @rich o brien said:

      #1 - importing improvements

      #2 - Quads

      +1!!! ...and sub-D modeling

      #3-10 - as usual... better texturing tools, 64bit, multicore support (yes, this is the way processors evolve now, if you want to hear it or not), high poly support, faster ruby script execution (it's just a joke, that you have to watch a counter when you round some edges, where another app can do this instantly...), faster saving/auto-saving (!), faster explode or copy/paste, disable/configure snapping, ...

      but, wait... why open a new wishlist?!? just rename the old sketchup 9 thread and we're done... or is there any point in it that has been implemented in 2013?

      just change the v9 or 2014 to 2015...

      http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10%26amp;t=52470

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • N Offline
        numerobis
        last edited by

        Sorry for "confusing" you with an "incorrect" quote... i thought it was clear, because the whole text was formatted as quote and there was the link to the other thread too. But now i see this huge mistake. It is corrected now...

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Rich O BrienR Offline
          Rich O Brien Moderator
          last edited by

          @jeff

          Both of us have now corrected the thread so we can go back to living separate lives again

          Download the free D'oh Book for SketchUp πŸ“–

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jeff hammondJ Offline
            jeff hammond
            last edited by

            aww.. i was joking.
            sorry if i upset anybody

            dotdotdot

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • TIGT Offline
              TIG Moderator
              last edited by

              That's called a double-double bluff πŸ˜‰

              TIG

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • jeff hammondJ Offline
                jeff hammond
                last edited by

                @tig said:

                That's called a double-double bluff πŸ˜‰

                ha. yeah, I wasn't sure.. I know rich is double double bluffing (ha!) but not sure about numerobis so I apologized just in case.

                dotdotdot

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Rich O BrienR Offline
                  Rich O Brien Moderator
                  last edited by

                  @jeff hammond said:

                  I know rich is double double bluffing

                  I stand by what i originally wrote here...

                  http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=519532#p519532

                  Download the free D'oh Book for SketchUp πŸ“–

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • N Offline
                    numerobis
                    last edited by

                    πŸ˜†

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • N Offline
                      numerobis
                      last edited by

                      @rich o brien said:

                      I stand by what i originally wrote here...

                      http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=519532#p519532

                      πŸ˜†

                      @jeff hammond said:

                      ha. yeah, I wasn't sure.. I know rich is double double bluffing (ha!) but not sure about numerobis so I apologized just in case.

                      no problem πŸ˜‰

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • halroachH Offline
                        halroach
                        last edited by

                        1. I wish there were a way to see the file sizes of components within the component browser.

                        It happens that you load a component into a model, only too late to remember that it's way too heavy for the specific model you're working on. Or that you need to calculate what the maximum of trees cars and people you can put into a model...

                        1. It would be nice to see a little indication of how many or Mb or k each component is... preferably as part of the 'large thumbnails' view, which I find that I use most often.

                        2. It would be nice to be able to select a bunch of components all at once in the component browser... if for checking how big they are... or for deleting a bunch... you know, as the name infers... it should act as a browser, just like windows explorer where you can select a list with SHIFT or specific components with CTRL...

                        FlexTools - Super Quick Windows, Doors, Slats...

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • A Offline
                          ArtPen
                          last edited by

                          We'll as usual:

                          1. X64
                          2. Mac ui improvements
                          3. Material list view
                          4. Faster viewport on big scenes

                          Cheers

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • TandemT Offline
                            Tandem
                            last edited by

                            Better Color, Material, Components Management on Mac.
                            Better Toolbar Control
                            Better UI on Mac in general especially window management.
                            Better Documentation or Detailed PDF Manual

                            I find the SketchUp / LayOut documentation available in the Knowledge Center lacking both in content and usability and quite unacceptable for a $590 software package.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M Offline
                              mac1
                              last edited by

                              @halroach said:

                              1. I wish there were a way to see the file sizes of components within the component browser.

                              It happens that you load a component into a model, only too late to remember that it's way too heavy for the specific model you're working on. Or that you need to calculate what the maximum of trees cars and people you can put into a model...

                              1. It would be nice to see a little indication of how many or Mb or k each component is... preferably as part of the 'large thumbnails' view, which I find that I use most often.

                              2. It would be nice to be able to select a bunch of components all at once in the component browser... if for checking how big they are... or for deleting a bunch... you know, as the name infers... it should act as a browser, just like windows explorer where you can select a list with SHIFT or specific components with CTRL...

                              FYI: I use save as collection some times to get that info, you can open a particular component, edit( Like edge decimation) it, save, use the outliner to select that in model, then the component browser to replaced selected with the edited component. Just did that to day and reduced mode size by about 35 MB quickly. Got about ten more to go with 100 + MB reduction target=> no redrawing of component model!

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • xiombargX Offline
                                xiombarg
                                last edited by

                                Currently I only have one BIG wish that I've had for awhile: BONES

                                Usually bones systems are used for figures and animations but I just want them for plain old hinges. I would love it if I could open a model door without having to go through the whole rotate routine. Would also be wonderful for multi-hinged objects.

                                Thomthom wrote a nice little plugin that rotates a hinge based upon where you've set your axis within a component, but it sure would be nice to have something more specialized.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • jiminy-billy-bobJ Offline
                                  jiminy-billy-bob
                                  last edited by

                                  @xiombarg said:

                                  I would love it if I could open a model door without having to go through the whole rotate routine

                                  You can do that with dynamic components and the interact tool. See at the bottom of this page : http://help.sketchup.com/fr/article/114621

                                  25% off Skatter for SketchUcation Premium Members

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • xiombargX Offline
                                    xiombarg
                                    last edited by

                                    @jiminy-billy-bob said:

                                    @xiombarg said:

                                    I would love it if I could open a model door without having to go through the whole rotate routine

                                    You can do that with dynamic components and the interact tool. See at the bottom of this page : http://help.sketchup.com/fr/article/114621

                                    Sorry, I should have been more clear. Doors that have more than one hinge axis, like bifold doors, accordion doors, or just any mechanical device that uses more than a single axis such as a string of railroad cars on a train. The dynamic components seem to work great for standard doors, but I've never been able to figure out how to make them work with multiple axis.

                                    Using the train example, bones systems let you reposition a single railroad car yet still keep all the cars connected.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • jiminy-billy-bobJ Offline
                                      jiminy-billy-bob
                                      last edited by

                                      Well, not sure about all you mention, but take a look at this : https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/collection.html?redirect=1%26amp;mid=50f4852e4734070e6bb8d8822a6e5009%26amp;prevstart=0

                                      @xiombarg said:

                                      accordion doors

                                      25% off Skatter for SketchUcation Premium Members

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • dereiD Offline
                                        derei
                                        last edited by

                                        @xiombarg said:

                                        Sorry, I should have been more clear. Doors that have more than one hinge axis, like bifold doors, accordion doors, or just any mechanical device that uses more than a single axis such as a string of railroad cars on a train. The dynamic components seem to work great for standard doors, but I've never been able to figure out how to make them work with multiple axis.

                                        You can do it with dynamic components. It's a bit tricky, because you have to consider both rotation joints, but not too hard to do.
                                        And one more thing: clogging Sketchup with tools that are too specific, could add speed problems and also could limit it. As it is now, it's very flexible and everyone can tailor it for its own needs, using various plugins. Maybe "wished" would be better kept in this area: only "root" sketchup features, that will make sketchup behave better, no adding new features.
                                        Indeed, a more intuitive DC making method could be a plus...but I can't imagine how it would look (interface, principle).

                                        DESIGNER AND ARTIST [DEREI.UK](http://derei.uk/l)

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • jeff hammondJ Offline
                                          jeff hammond
                                          last edited by

                                          @derei said:

                                          Indeed, a more intuitive DC making method could be a plus...but I can't imagine how it would look (interface, principle).

                                          maybe something like this? πŸ˜„

                                          grasshopper for rhino

                                          dotdotdot

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • xiombargX Offline
                                            xiombarg
                                            last edited by

                                            I would think that having a more straightforward and versatile connecting system would be a valid request. All engineering and animation modelling programs have them, and it is an application that is used in almost all areas of 3D modelling and product design.

                                            I've tried using Dynamic Components to create a mechanical arm with multiple points of articulation and I couldn't get it to work correctly. It seems to me that Dynamic Components don't nest together well, especially when an articulation point has to both twist and swing at the same location. Not to say that you can't use dynamic components for different things, but it's limited and awkward for multi-tiered joint system.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 1 / 4
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Buy SketchPlus
                                            Buy SUbD
                                            Buy WrapR
                                            Buy eBook
                                            Buy Modelur
                                            Buy Vertex Tools
                                            Buy SketchCuisine
                                            Buy FormFonts

                                            Advertisement