๐Ÿ’ก LightUp 7.1 | SketchUp's only real-time renderer that uses object-based rendering Download Trial
  • Getting the file of a component

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    647 Views
    TIGT

    @rubine said:

    do you see a chance to rebuild the "create component" with ruby?
    i.e. writing your own "create component" method (creating a ComponentDefinition)

    You can easily make and place components with ruby methods, such as.

    Definitionlist.add("componentdefinitionname")

    ComponentDefinition.entities

    Group.entities

    Group.to_component

    entities have lots of 'add' methods: http://download.sketchup.com/sketchuphelp/gsu6_ruby/Docs/Ruby-Entities.html#add_instance

    You can't 'save_as' components in current Ruby - but you can do it manually.

    I've discovered that in the SDK there's a kind of ...Group.SaveAs() method that would allow us to write something like a dll or a socket that could then access that function. In a script you'd have to say something like:
    require 'GroupExporter.so'
    ...
    GroupExporter.new(group,filepath)
    ...
    This would then save a specified group to a .skp file at a specified name/location. These kinds of variables can be got/set in earlier bits of Ruby coding...
    To get it to export a Component all we'd need to do is make a temporary group, that's then named after the component-definition and even with a copy of its description if any (that way the final exporter component matches the original in the model...). Then to that group's entities we add an instance of the component (and explode it inside the group?). We then use GroupExporter.new(group,filepath) and finally erase the group to tidy up. If we want it done 'silently' we can specify the filepath - say as the model's folder_path/group_name.skp - or we could prompt for a component name and/or location...

    All I need now is someone who can make this dll/so with the SDK - my C++ is too poor to do it...

  • Trouble With Ruby

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    963 Views
    Dave RD

    Thank you. That worked.

    Cheers,

    Dave

  • Looking for onscreen time & date script

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    579 Views
    J

    Thanks Dave, that's the one! I've just bought it! Thanks to TBD as well! ๐Ÿ‘

  • Using add_3d_text

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    2k Views
    G

    Thanks TIG,

    I'll apply your suggestions and evaluate the results.

    Greg

  • Components

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    793 Views
    R

    if my hierarchy of components has 3 levels, is it possible to get the hierarchy of all the components (so that one can see of which components one component consists)?

  • Load file

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    790 Views
    R

    is there also a possibility to store components automatically in a folder (as an .skp file)?

  • What is needed to script?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    Alan FraserA

    Useful link for the more advanced.
    http://notepad-plus.sourceforge.net/uk/site.htm

  • Extrude lines along path

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    5k Views
  • Array and center point....

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    G

    Working OK at the moment - images attached.

    Bob

    ScreenHunter_01_resize.jpg

    ScreenHunter_02_resize.jpg

  • Clipping When drawing from a Tool

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    942 Views
    T

    The thing with a Bounding Box is - it's virtual. You don't have to have any geometry to create and populate a bounding box.

  • Creating a material from an existing one

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    fredo6F

    @jim said:

    I agree about needing to read or write on the disk in order to accomplish this; however... if you are going to be reading and writing files, why not copy the .skm, load it, and make the adjustments? Either way, it looks as if the best you are going to do is a clunky work-around.

    Well, this is to create programmatically a semi-transparent material from an existing material. This is the only way to build a macro that would show part of the model in Xray (as the View mode of Sketchup applies to the whole model). At the moment, I can do it with color of material, but cannot get the textures to be Xray'ed.

    See discussion thread in the forum at http://www.sketchucation.com/forums/scf/viewtopic.php?f=57&t=6638
    and also in the French section (http://www.sketchucation.com/forums/scf/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=6589&start=0)

    model from Claire

  • LanguageHandler question

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    528 Views
    Didier BurD

    Yep, that's it !

    @unknownuser said:

    the reason it fails, it because it is looking for: "=", and this line has: " = "

    Thanks Al. I was thinking that the strip method didn't care of spaces, and it does in fact.

    Since components.strings is the stock file that is installed with the french package of GSU: ๐Ÿ‘Ž to SU Team ๐Ÿ˜‰

  • Web Dialog Help and Debugging Thread

    19
    0 Votes
    19 Posts
    3k Views
    L

    @unknownuser said:

    because WebDialogs are not using the default browser installed on the user machine, but instead a Internet Explorer shell (the same that you see when viewing .chm files for example) on Windows version.

    there is no option to use other browser engine for displaying WebDialogs.

    btw, why do you need another one ?

    Just another point on this issue since this was the only thread I could find that was related somewhat to my problem. I was using the get models button to access 3d warehouse for the longest time, no prob. Then one day the model images would not appear in the popup browser and I couldn't download them to my sketchup model. I tried restarting SU, rebooting the computer and eating some chicken soup...all to no avail.

    Since I use FF as my default browser I assumed that SU was using it in some weird form as the get model popup. I now know that it uses IE, and was able to solve the problem by locating my deleted version of IE and purging all the cookies and caches. Too bad we can't choose to have FF used as the default dialog. Would be less confusing in certain instances.

    cheers...

  • How get the Group object contains the particular entity

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    874 Views
    TIGT

    @wikii said:

    Hi all,I want to get the Group object that contains the selected objects.
    such as:

    > First I select a Group > Sketchup.active_model.selection[0] => <Sketchup;;Group;0xb79eb20> > I open it ,and ,select an edge > Sketchup.active_model.selection[0] => <Sketchup;;Edge;0xb79ea48> > Now I want to get the Group object contains '<Sketchup;;Edge;0xb79ea48>' ,that should be '<Sketchup;;Group;0xb79eb20>'.Using 'parent' methods๏ผŒit can't work at all. > Sketchup.active_model.selection[0].parent => #<Sketchup;;ComponentDefinition;0xb79e958> >

    Please help me.

    So far so good, you have the ComponentDefinintion. Let's say you set it to 'cdef', then
    cdef.instances[0] will return the group you want - there's only one instance of a group's component-definition - I know it's convoluted !!!

    NOW you have the parent of the edge... = the group ?

  • Xray ruby component?

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    fredo6F

    Wireframe is even simpler, as you just hide / show the faces

    The big problem for Xray, is that I don't find any way to create a material from an existing one, or to assign the new one the same texture as the old one, especially with SU v6, as the JPG are now embedded in SKM files. So the macro works without texture at the moment.

    Does anyone see a solution?

  • Extension .RBS..What?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    670 Views
    Dave RD

    RBS files work as RB files. They are Secured or Scrambled by the author but SketchUp can still read them. There should be no reason to change the extension. Which plugins did you download? Knowing that will help us get you going with them.

  • How to save a component definition

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    Al HartA

    Yes.

    @tig said:

    Or put another way - you want a method something like:

    ComponentDefinition.export

    or

    ComponentDefinition.save_as

    ...

  • Export with ruby to jpg

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    T

    View.write_image.

    Todd

  • Make3D - could it be done with ruby

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    N

    Why automate? It can save time, if it works reasonable well. I would not expect that automated mapping can do all what you can do with manual photo match, but I am fairly confident that if make3D would be made as plugin it would find users. Anyhow... code is there.

  • Password protect locked component / group

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    3k Views
    Al HartA

    Also, some "search engines" aggregate content by trying to provide a better way to serach it and find it, and, of course, perhaps adding their own advertising to the search pages instead of the Google Ads which you have to suspect will appear someday.

Advertisement