Interesting, I did it manually with no problems. Perhaps this is yet again coming back to SU tolerance issues? Chris

@daiku said: Clearly I was overthinking it! Thanks, Thomas. Something none of us have ever been guilty of before Chris

@daiku said: I guess Martin's way is fine. It won't create a second face, will it? Yes, I'm creating it on an exisiting face. Looping through the geometry was straightforward - it's not that large a component. In that case you should only need to check the faces collection of one of the returned edges.

You can open the Sketchup.rb to see what is included in it. Chris

Very happy to hear that it's still in the works as well as your commitment to continue making awesome plug-ins. And please remember I'm natural lab rat so if any beta testing is required just let me know.

Let me know ifyou need beta testers.

As a temporary work-around, added a prompt: [image: OI60_068.png] This will allow you to leave the unfold tool and resume when re-activated - but moving the geometry (including using Undo) will invalidate the history and the re-fold will fail. Download from http://bitbucket.org/jimfoltz/sketchup-unfold-tool/get/tip.zip

thank you all... I wish someone would compile a thread with all (or most) plugins ever created, with small animations of what they do, just like the Must Have Rubys Visual Index, but BIGGER

@thomthom said: @martinrinehart said: The w3c insists that you put the <script>...</script> above the </body>. Please join in my subversive campaign against the w3c: http://www.MartinRinehart.com/articles/xhtml-strict-not.html No no no. You should read up some more about separating content from layout in regards to web development. There are very good reasons why all best-practices articles discourages tag-soup. You did not address the content of my article. Is your web the exclusive property of web professionals? Are we drifting way off topic?

Hi Gaieus Sort of an odd ball deal but IMO more script focused but move as you see fit. The 3d PDF that I used built a much larger file than Al Hart's offering for SU but had better images in all render modes. The PDF tools are just killer. Cheers dtr

Maybe, but I don't understand it myself. Rather than returning from the proc, the proc itself evaluates, and that is what is returned.

Or just recreate the dialog every time... def create_dialog @dlg = UI;;WebDialog.new( ... ) @dlg.show { } end

@cjthompson said: The reason I was asking was in regards to this post: http://forums.sketchucation.com/viewtopic.php?f=180&t=22567 Is it possible that the bounding box's initialize was interfering with the web dialog's? I don't think so because I have seen invalid dialogs aldo, and I'm fairly certain I have not redefined initialize at the top-level. I see invalid dialogs through variables that reference a dialog that has been closed. I've added some example code here.

@jim said: Hey! thanks remus. I have made this sticky - for a few weeks, at least. Nothing major - but being able to screen-shot a WebDialog from Ruby is interesting. I misinterpreted the word Screen shot, I'm hoping for pictures to be added to the code examples for the entire ruby api, where ever possible. It would help get more potential ruby scriptwriters on board.

I had a look at it. But I get an Access Denied message when I try to call back to Ruby. Turns out IE's XMLHttpRequest only works with files on the net - not local files and other stuff. http://www.webdeveloper.com/forum/showpost.php?s=d7e6a32ad41106e35a2d51afbce8f374&p=749574&postcount=10

I think the most important criteria: which ones will let the .execute_script be synchronous?

On OSX - the window is actually just hidden. The embedded WebBrowser object is created as you add the HTML to the WebDialog object - as oppose on PX, where it's rebuilt on evvery .show....

Thanks Jeff, that's it and that was very quick.

Not at once, but stack them up. I think. I've not used the feature. Maybe the tools have to implement the suspend and resume methods...

@kwistenbiebel said: Wuaaah...wouldn't that create a temporal anomaly in the subspace field ? It depends on how much dilithium crystals we put into it...