Urasik Extensions | Lots of new extensions to check out Learn More

Alkategóriák

  • No decscription available

    20 Témakörök
    462 Hozzászólások
    HornOxxH
    @pilou said: More appetizing in chocolate! Eggs are good as well - but only very fragile when falling down in SketchyPhysics
  • Using add_3d_text

    15
    0 Szavazatok
    15 Hozzászólások
    2k Megtekintések
    G
    Thanks TIG, I'll apply your suggestions and evaluate the results. Greg
  • Components

    6
    0 Szavazatok
    6 Hozzászólások
    981 Megtekintések
    R
    if my hierarchy of components has 3 levels, is it possible to get the hierarchy of all the components (so that one can see of which components one component consists)?
  • Load file

    4
    0 Szavazatok
    4 Hozzászólások
    941 Megtekintések
    R
    is there also a possibility to store components automatically in a folder (as an .skp file)?
  • What is needed to script?

    4
    0 Szavazatok
    4 Hozzászólások
    2k Megtekintések
    Alan FraserA
    Useful link for the more advanced. http://notepad-plus.sourceforge.net/uk/site.htm
  • Extrude lines along path

    11
    0 Szavazatok
    11 Hozzászólások
    5k Megtekintések
    pilouP
    http://www.crai.archi.fr/RubyLibraryDepot/Ruby/EM/ExtrudeAlongPath.rb ? Not exactly but...
  • Array and center point....

    9
    0 Szavazatok
    9 Hozzászólások
    2k Megtekintések
    G
    Working OK at the moment - images attached. Bob [image: p2mR_ScreenHunter_01_resize.jpg] [image: SPjD_ScreenHunter_02_resize.jpg]
  • Clipping When drawing from a Tool

    10
    0 Szavazatok
    10 Hozzászólások
    1k Megtekintések
    T
    The thing with a Bounding Box is - it's virtual. You don't have to have any geometry to create and populate a bounding box.
  • Creating a material from an existing one

    8
    0 Szavazatok
    8 Hozzászólások
    1k Megtekintések
    fredo6F
    @jim said: I agree about needing to read or write on the disk in order to accomplish this; however... if you are going to be reading and writing files, why not copy the .skm, load it, and make the adjustments? Either way, it looks as if the best you are going to do is a clunky work-around. Well, this is to create programmatically a semi-transparent material from an existing material. This is the only way to build a macro that would show part of the model in Xray (as the View mode of Sketchup applies to the whole model). At the moment, I can do it with color of material, but cannot get the textures to be Xray'ed. See discussion thread in the forum at http://www.sketchucation.com/forums/scf/viewtopic.php?f=57&t=6638 and also in the French section (http://www.sketchucation.com/forums/scf/viewtopic.php?f=51&t=6589&start=0) [image: 0DFA_xrayhousepartial.jpg]
  • LanguageHandler question

    3
    0 Szavazatok
    3 Hozzászólások
    617 Megtekintések
    Didier BurD
    Yep, that's it ! @unknownuser said: the reason it fails, it because it is looking for: "=", and this line has: " = " Thanks Al. I was thinking that the strip method didn't care of spaces, and it does in fact. Since components.strings is the stock file that is installed with the french package of GSU: to SU Team
  • Web Dialog Help and Debugging Thread

    19
    0 Szavazatok
    19 Hozzászólások
    4k Megtekintések
    L
    @unknownuser said: because WebDialogs are not using the default browser installed on the user machine, but instead a Internet Explorer shell (the same that you see when viewing .chm files for example) on Windows version. there is no option to use other browser engine for displaying WebDialogs. btw, why do you need another one ? Just another point on this issue since this was the only thread I could find that was related somewhat to my problem. I was using the get models button to access 3d warehouse for the longest time, no prob. Then one day the model images would not appear in the popup browser and I couldn't download them to my sketchup model. I tried restarting SU, rebooting the computer and eating some chicken soup...all to no avail. Since I use FF as my default browser I assumed that SU was using it in some weird form as the get model popup. I now know that it uses IE, and was able to solve the problem by locating my deleted version of IE and purging all the cookies and caches. Too bad we can't choose to have FF used as the default dialog. Would be less confusing in certain instances. cheers...
  • How get the Group object contains the particular entity

    2
    0 Szavazatok
    2 Hozzászólások
    940 Megtekintések
    TIGT
    @wikii said: Hi all,I want to get the Group object that contains the selected objects. such as: > First I select a Group > Sketchup.active_model.selection[0] => <Sketchup;;Group;0xb79eb20> > I open it ,and ,select an edge > Sketchup.active_model.selection[0] => <Sketchup;;Edge;0xb79ea48> > Now I want to get the Group object contains '<Sketchup;;Edge;0xb79ea48>' ,that should be '<Sketchup;;Group;0xb79eb20>'.Using 'parent' methods,it can't work at all. > Sketchup.active_model.selection[0].parent => #<Sketchup;;ComponentDefinition;0xb79e958> > Please help me. So far so good, you have the ComponentDefinintion. Let's say you set it to 'cdef', then cdef.instances[0] will return the group you want - there's only one instance of a group's component-definition - I know it's convoluted !!! NOW you have the parent of the edge... = the group ?
  • Xray ruby component?

    7
    0 Szavazatok
    7 Hozzászólások
    1k Megtekintések
    fredo6F
    Wireframe is even simpler, as you just hide / show the faces The big problem for Xray, is that I don't find any way to create a material from an existing one, or to assign the new one the same texture as the old one, especially with SU v6, as the JPG are now embedded in SKM files. So the macro works without texture at the moment. Does anyone see a solution?
  • Extension .RBS..What?

    3
    0 Szavazatok
    3 Hozzászólások
    751 Megtekintések
    Dave RD
    RBS files work as RB files. They are Secured or Scrambled by the author but SketchUp can still read them. There should be no reason to change the extension. Which plugins did you download? Knowing that will help us get you going with them.
  • How to save a component definition

    6
    0 Szavazatok
    6 Hozzászólások
    2k Megtekintések
    Al HartA
    Yes. @tig said: Or put another way - you want a method something like: ComponentDefinition.export or ComponentDefinition.save_as ...
  • Export with ruby to jpg

    3
    0 Szavazatok
    3 Hozzászólások
    1k Megtekintések
    T
    View.write_image. Todd
  • Make3D - could it be done with ruby

    8
    0 Szavazatok
    8 Hozzászólások
    1k Megtekintések
    N
    Why automate? It can save time, if it works reasonable well. I would not expect that automated mapping can do all what you can do with manual photo match, but I am fairly confident that if make3D would be made as plugin it would find users. Anyhow... code is there.
  • Password protect locked component / group

    11
    0 Szavazatok
    11 Hozzászólások
    4k Megtekintések
    Al HartA
    Also, some "search engines" aggregate content by trying to provide a better way to serach it and find it, and, of course, perhaps adding their own advertising to the search pages instead of the Google Ads which you have to suspect will appear someday.
  • Webdialog: html and rb example

    6
    0 Szavazatok
    6 Hozzászólások
    1k Megtekintések
    T
    Try this search argument: http://groups.google.com/group/Ruby-API/search?group=Ruby-API&q=webdialog&qt_g=Search+this+category Todd
  • Webdialog and active_model

    6
    0 Szavazatok
    6 Hozzászólások
    2k Megtekintések
    C
    Hello Koos, I understand your concern about publishing your code. I'm sure you can help me in my other post. http://www.sketchucation.com/forums/scf/viewtopic.php?f=57&t=6543&p=41849#p41849 Maybe you could have a look there and put me on the rails? I'v solved some of my problems nut still have no idea how to put more text boxes in my form and retrieve each single variable into sketchup. I feel this : dlg.add_action_callback("ValueChanged") {|d,p| $avariable = p } is to short to do so because i can retrieve just one varaiable. Isn't it? Do not hesitate to reply in the other post so that I can end this one. Thank you Koos.
  • BOOKMARK YOUR TOPICS

    3
    0 Szavazatok
    3 Hozzászólások
    894 Megtekintések
    GaieusG
    You are right, Al, the Ruby section has been all transferred for long (credits go mainly to Eric/Boo...)

Advertisement