Professional response? For you, "toxic", after pronouncing our conversation "techno-dropping nonsense"? Now you claim "professionalism" after interjecting yourself in the thread in such a way? Find your own forum, toxic, one better suited to your alias.
I built this back in Atlanta where redwood is a little harder to find. I used pressure treated yellow pine for the beams, redwood for the fascias and railing posts, and cypress on the treads and railings. I didn't model it but my railings were actually two layers of 5/4 x 6. the first layer I screwed to the shoulders of the tenons on the posts, and then the second layer I screwed from underneath so there weren't any visible fasteners.
I appreciate the suggestion on the labels.I should have thought of that.
Reading the title of your post made me think of that article 😛
I wonder how many people actually use any of the features in adobe that arent scrolling and zooming.
It took me hours to figure out how to use Adobe's text tool so I could insert text in a PDF. You would think it would be a noticable and clearly marked icon on the basic toolbar.
I still remember the first time I stumbled across a site selling a guide on how to run your car on water. My first reaction was that it was a total scam, and I was thinking that only someone completely gullible would fall for it.
The truth is, however, water powered cars have been around for a while now, and the underlying technology was proven ages ago. In fact, the first patents for this technology existed (get this) over 90 years ago. They are still easily accessible today if you want to read them.
This is from a nationwide news channel covering this technology. There are dozens of other video’s like this, too.
So we have US patents proving the technology, as well as huge news stations covering it. But that’s not all. Since more people have come aware of this type of technology, many ordinary people just like you have started to do it.
In fact, if you look at some of the top selling guides like Water Car Pro, you will find that many of them have tons of testimonials from people that normally have no technical knowledge, yet have still managed to do this.
And as if THAT were not enough… a simple Google search will reveal tons of sites that are dedicated to stuff like this. Many of them will run AdSense ads or point to guides that teach you how to convert your car to run on water, which will show you even more stuff about this industry. There is simply no way that the whole thing could be fake.
There are several guides out now that teach you how to run your car on water, including Water Car Pro. These will tell you exactly what you need to do, so you can see proof.
In fact, the IRS has already recognized that water fuelled cars are a thing of the future. Therefore, they are willing to give you tax deductions for running your car on water, because it means less pollution and greenhouse gases that cost money to fix.
There is only one smart decision for you to make – and that is to convert your car to run on water NOW. There are tons of benefits.
I looked it up...Friday night distractions. Unfortunately, I'm more likely to be the "evil Kirk" from The Enemy Within, not the "evil Spock" from In a Mirror, Darkly.
Ahhh. Wimbledon. The downs what a great venue for a sporting event. I cannot say that I am in complete agreement with the outcome however.
Secretairiet at 6 furlongs on a muddy track is usually a lock at 6/5 But his penalty kick is weak from the blue line is weak from his left. Not since the super secret winged keel
Has a outcome been more one sided. But my main point is after the 4th chucker wimbledon is not nearly as relevant as NASCAR.
GOD
Pretty damn messy, the one time I used this. Anything out of "line of sight" of the laser emitter was ignored, so you had to rebuild the missing faces using the faces it did sample. I assume that more sophisticated versions of this (or more sophisticated users) would allow you to move the unit around, fixing its position with GPS, and assemble a more complete scan.
And it was slow, too. Another student at my grad school scanned someone dancing, and then milled out a (very abstract) flowing relief sculpture...the mesh was composed of multiple periods in the dance, frozen into one giant mesh about eight feet long.
