Maybe you could just disable the Tag toolbar (with its dropbox). I can't reproduce it myself, but there might be some interferences, and this is new to SU2026.
Extension Creator
Share, test and sell extensions
Private
Posts
-
RE: Box Stretching - New Dimensions
-
RE: Box Stretching - New Dimensions
@szabo said in Box Stretching - New Dimensions:
@fredo6 Hello, will you update the version to fix the error?
First, I don't know if you are on Windows or Mac; and which problem you have exactly. I can't reproduce it on WIndows.
And if this is an issue with SU2026, I am not sure I can fix it. Did you try with SU2026.1?
-
RE: Sci-Fi Throne Room
Would you be interested in rendering this model with Rayscaper (https://sketchucation.com/plugin/2677-rayscaper)?
I'm trying to build something that appeals to the Twilight userbase. And having your feedback on what works and what doesn't would be awesome.
edit: And of course, a superb render, well done!
-
RE: Medeek Engineering
The other issue I am a bit unclear on is the unbraced length (lu) especially in the case of checking negative moments in multi-span situations (unbraced bottom). I've checked a number of examples in Donald Breyer's book "Design of Wood Structures". Rather than considering the lu as the actual span he is calculating the lu as the distance between the points of zero moment. I could use a bit of clarification on this. Section 3.3.3.4 of the NDS (page 17) only talks about the distance between points of intermediate lateral support.
After giving this some more thought and digging through the NDS a bit more I think the reason that Breyer makes this assumption is that the language in the NDS for computing the Cv (volume factor) does say the distance between points of zero moments. He then seems to extends this idea to computing the CL by using the same logic to determine the unbraced length (on both sides of a support). See example 6.28 in chapter 6.16.
My only problem with this is that it would seem like it would be unconservative in many cases with multi-span beams where you are computing the CL for negative moments (at supports). However by using the full intermediate span length as the unbraced length perhaps it is too conservative. I wish the NDS would give more guidance on this matter, I can only guess at the intent and supposed correct algorithm at this point.
Let's consider the example shown in the image below:
If we consider that there is no lateral bracing at the intermediate support at 84" (bottom of beam) then per Breyer's method the unbraced length is between points of zero moment (x=67" to x=108"), so the unbraced length for the negative bending (neg. moment) is equal to 41". However I would argue that it is the full beam length, both spans, so 144".
If we do consider that the beam is laterally braced (bottom of the beam) at the intermediate support at x = 84" then Breyer considers the worse case of the two conditions 84 - 67 = 17" and 108 - 84 = 24" and he concludes that the unbraced length should be 24". I would look at both spans on each side of the support or max. negative moment and take the larger of the two 84" > 60", so the unbraced length should be 84".
Thoughts? Am I too conservative?
On a slightly different note I would use 41" length to compute my Cv for the negative bending (for both cases given above). This is per the NDS verbage (Sec. 5.3.6).
-
RE: Ändern des Bearbeitungsdatums ?
The SKP file fails to open with a file-type error, but looking into its contents shows a v23 file and not lines of 0s , unlike a lot of files with that error.
Die SKP-Datei lässt sich aufgrund eines Dateitypfehlers nicht öffnen, aber ein Blick in ihren Inhalt zeigt eine v23-Datei und nicht Zeilen voller Nullen, im Gegensatz zu vielen anderen Dateien, bei denen dieser Fehler auftritt.
SketchUp Model૿{23.0.419}So it's FUBAR.
Perhaps someone else has other ideas...Es ist also komplett ruiniert.
Vielleicht hat ja jemand anderes noch andere Ideen … -
RE: Medeek Engineering
Version 0.8.4 - 11.21.2025
- Fixed a bug with partial bearing at end supports.
- Added the bearing area factor (Cb) to the bearing calculations and adjustment factors table.
- Added the "Braced at Supports" option to the top and bottom lateral bracing options.
- Fixed the lateral bracing algorithm for bending so that blocking at supports is enabled (bracing at top and bottom).
- Fixed the algorithm for lateral bracing so that the unbraced length is correctly calculated.
-
RE: SCFLicense: Extension Licensing on Sketchucation
Can you try again please?
-
RE: SCFLicense: Extension Licensing on Sketchucation
Yeah, I can confirm there is a hiccup. Give us a few mins to look into it.
