And a reply email to what I forwarded to them as a suspicious phishing email looks like this: @unknownuser said: reply-to spoof@paypal.com to Csaba Pozsarko date 26 November 2008 10:50 subject RE: - Your recent report to PayPal (KMM106697224V70159L0KM) :kf1 Reply Hello Csaba Pozsarko, Thanks for forwarding that suspicious-looking email. You're right - it was a phishing attempt, and we're working on stopping the fraud. By reporting the problem, you've made a difference! Identity thieves try to trick you into revealing your password or other personal information through phishing emails and fake websites. To learn more about online safety, click "Security Center" on any PayPal webpage. Every email counts. When you forward suspicious-looking emails to spoof@paypal.com, you help keep yourself and others safe from identity theft. Your account security is very important to us, so we appreciate your extra effort. Thanks, PayPal This email is sent to you by the contracting entity to your User Agreement, either PayPal Ince, PayPal Pte. Ltd or PayPal (Europe) S.à r.l. & Cie, S.C.A. Société en Commandite par Actions, Registered Office: 5th Floor 22-24 Boulevard Royal L-2449, Luxembourg RCS Luxembourg B 118 349.

and who said that crime does not pay??? well I guess it does for a while until you get caught.

Hi Guys, I found one that does the job for me and thought I'd mention it in case anyone else has the need to exactly resize an app window, its Zooom/2, http://www.coderage-software.com/zooom/index.html It's not free (€12.51) but does have a 30 day trial. Mike

Woops, well i hope you had a happy birthday

yes I thought it was creepy. but teenage creepy it was really amateurish and at 43 I felt like the old man sitting in the rocking chair at a family reunion.

@johnsenior1973 said: You are kidding, right? There's a list of upgrades that people have requested on this forum that have been completely and utterly ignored by Google. You think they are going to rush the release of SU7 because of this thread while completely ignoring what they want? Slightly Bitter John?

@paul j said: %(#4000BF)[Heard today at work that they might be considering getting CATIA. I will do a Google search in a moment - just wondering if anyone on this forum uses it and can answer the following *** Is it a hard package to learn ? (I guess I am worried about a steep learning curve) ** Are there many similarities to Sketchup ? ** Does anyone have a link to a demo that can be downloaded ?*] I have used SolidWorks, which is a little cousin to Catia. My responses to your questions: It is significantly more complex than SketchUP but more in an enterprise way than a modeling way. Restating that, the modeler in Catia will have some similarities to SketchUP. But Catia's power is not it's modeler, it is the ability to have multiple (and I mean many) operators working on the same design simultaneously without stepping on each others toes. The other major strength of Catia, where SketchUp has no functionality whatsoever, is it's tie in to sophisticated data management systems. This allows the parts that are designed to be machined, purchased, whatever by a complete different team than the original modelers. SketchUp's modeler is very easy to use, but it has no history. You start with a shape and add things to it or subtract things from it. Catia, SolidWorks, Pro/E are parametric modelers where all your operations are kept in a tree and you can go back and change values. Inserted a hole in step three that was 5 mm in diameter, you can click on it and change the hole to 3 mm and it will correctly change it. Now saying this, Siemens and PTC are releasing history-less modelers which as far as I can tell act a lot like SketchUP. My experience is both have advantages which is why SolidEdge and Pro/E are being released with both capabilities. I'm certain SolidWorks and Catia will eventually get these features. It's a competitive market. You aren't going to find a demo to download. The distribution of all professional 3D MCAD is VERY tightly controlled via vendor networks. SolidWorks is, Catia even more so. These are high end products aimed at industrial audiences and they don't want anybody pirating this stuff if they can avoid it. Hopefully your employer is signing on for significant training. While you can effectively learn SketchUp (and SolidWorks) on your own, that just simply isn't possible in Catia. The training budget for the first year should be in the ballpark of your software outlay costs or your implementation is going to be a financial failure. I guarantee it. I'm not kidding. The second year it can be less, etc, etc, etc. The other gotcha to Catia is maintenance costs. All professional 3D MCAD has an annual subscription cost of approximately 25% of the original price per year. So if your seat of Catia cost $20,000 (which wouldn't surprise me as I paid $25,000 a seat for Pro/E in 1996) your company will be faced with a $5,000 bill very year to maintain that seat of software. To the commenter that suggested SpaceClaim, it's a good modeler that is not history based. The CEO of SpaceClaim was the original developer of both Pro/E and SolidWorks. But SpaceClaim is not Catia and won't be for a long. It's the enterprise functionality. Good luck and let us know what your thought are when you see Catia.

Redneck Gingerbread House: [image: XxE9_rngingerbread.jpg]

..... and don't forget to have ANOTHER look at Layout, now Layout2! http://sketchup.google.com/product/layout.html I think Layout has now grown up and will be adopted by many professionals with a need to communicate their design ideas to clients.

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/28151

I think it will be more along these lines: See George run. Run, George, run.

@petercharles said: @autarchos said: Huh, what's happened???? Someone must have moderated it. Anyway, it's there so have a look.

@unknownuser said: If only I knew what's going on there!

Well I hope they give every Vista user a free license for Windows 7 if it actually is better.

Ah, a retread of a Clinton joke. Not unexpected. Hopefully, it will be reworked again in 4 years...

Thought I would give it a try before bed. NEVERMIND how late I stayed awake without knowing. I was VERY pleased with myself when I realized the only way to beat the falling ball was to build a trebuchet. Also it took me a while to figure out there were solutions not using the wheels at all. Failed at getting the several balls across a pit. I'm staying away from it nevetheless.

@bellwells said: @sorgesu said: Ah I bet the stock has split several times since 46, not a fair comparison Ahha Susan, I failed to consider this so I did a little research. According to Yahoo, GM did a 2:1 split in March of 1989. If this is accurate, then today's stock price is only twice what it was in 1946. GM Stock Split History lists all the splits since the 1950s

Hi Todd, hi folks. Better late than never. Happy birthday

I thought I saw it yesterday just off the M1 motorway near worksop.