One of my earliest SU models for the museum project I was on. Went back in to it an re-rendered it. Swapped native SU materials for better textures I've amassed over time. Brought in some better Form Font trees.
Structure design is in keeping with the overall theme of this area of the project. It's main purpose was to hide a mass of aquarium plumbing, electrical and HVAC stuff that ran down the wall. Small metal structure attached is a place marker for a proposed songbird aviary. It got "value engineered" down to the size of a garden shed !
[image: 9D5T_birdhouse_final_small.jpg]
Thanks HornOxx. You are right about knowing when to stop adding the small stuff into a model. I'm use to doing images that are pretty "over the top". , had to keep reminding myself not to do too much on this. Doubt I'll be revisiting this it was pretty much a "one and done" deal.
Maersk Line Orbital freighter in Neptune orbit. Powered by eight VASIMR plasma driven engines (variable specific impulse magnetoplasma rocket), the freighter moves bulk cargo from low orbit to high orbit where it’s transferred to larger interplanetary freighters.
The VASIMR engine is highly efficient compared to a traditional chemical engine able to move 34 metric tons of cargo to a higher orbit for only 8 tons of expended fuel. However the trade off is that it’s incredibly slow taking months to achieve this rather than days.
Therefore crews in the haulage business will typically sign up for a 12 month round trip tour. Although this type of work does not pay very well compared to the 10+ year interstellar tours, the trade off is that you always get a good view and are no more than eight hours from a conversation with home.
[image: css2cvi57y201.jpg]
@pilou said:
In how many time have you paint the Van Gogh that I see on the right?
Not sure what you mean pilou, but that was the first image that was on 3D warehouse. If I had the time, Whisteler, Homer or Belows would have been a better choice
Brilliant images, they put a smile on my face too. All of those artists make a positive contribution to the happiness level of those who see them and in my book that puts them on the top shelf of humanity.
@chedda said:
Thanks for the comments guys i should have added it was completed in 1959 i'm quite amazed how these structures are timeless and modern regardless of era. The dome shell itself tapers from its feet in thickness from 60cm to 10cm at the crown. I believe it presented an engineering challenge at the time.
Architects and investors caring good design has always been rare.
I think the old cliche about photographs rather than renders is redundant but man, those are brilliant I really did think they were too good to be renders.