@sorgesu said:
I have to agree with Mike's comment about the surrounding trees. They are too bright a colour and contrasty and steel from the focus of the building.
Yes, I agree... I should have made those darker. Thanks for reminding me of that, both of you π
@sorgesu said:
I also agree about tree in front of the doorway. It does obscure. Being semi-transparent really doesn't change that and I have a personal problem with semi-transparent trees anyway. I know it is done in architecture, but I really don't think it is necessary and frankly, its a weird convention. If the tree is really going to obscure something important, use a skimpier tree. Otherwise, if it is just more brick, we get the idea and there is no reason to go transparent.
In this one the tree actually obscures the doorway and 90 percent of the time the focuse of these renderings should be the doorway. Inviting one in so to speak. Therefore the greatest area of contrast should always be arranged to be at the door. This door is a little too dark and obscured. In fact the window to the left is more contrasty.
I totally agree, in this case it was specified by the client that these trees were there and the he would not agree to a change in angle, so..... darn clients π
@sorgesu said:
But that was just pushing an academic critique. The overall execution is masterful, the moode delightful the technque wonderful.
Thank you Susan, you know how much I appreciate your input. It is always so valuable!
And thank you to everyone else as well!!