@bentleykfrog said:

@mitcorb said:

I am gonna hazard a guess that it is "Proper Animation"? Search this
hope this helps.....
-niall

Thanks, your posts are very useful

Now you"ve done all. and you've made the flightpath. And then we have a little problem.
How can we flip the animation.

I.ve made a few lines, I welded it, And it's not a close line.
it need to go from right to left but is goes from left to right. How Can I fix this?

@srx said:

I like it. Good modeling and details. ..

Thanks SRX, you're right.
It's got more feeling this way. nice job

@daniel said:

Jeremy, they look great. The one constructive criticism I have is ...

Hey Daniel, thanks for the criticism. I I will take it with me in the next drawing.

Hello People,

It's been a long time. I was very busy, creating some designs.
Picture 1 is an restyle of ooldeveste, a dutch street.
It's made with sketchup and kerkythea.

Every single house is 1 skp. file with each 4 layers.
Totaly I combined 4 skp. files; 3 houses and 1 street with surrounding.
Of every layer I exported it to kerkythea and made it a kzx. file.
At last I merged every kzx. in kerkythea and this is the result.

Picture 2 is an house in Wijnandsrade (NL). A house extension with a extra roof.

I hope you like my style.

Hello people,

I have a project where people want to see the inside of a house. My problem is animating the camera along a path.
Is there a plugin for this? If yes wich plugin. Please help me out.

Jeremy

guys,

How can I export an animation path to kerkythea?
I use the plugin, but when I open the exported file in kerkythea it will not open.
Or I see no file in it.

please tell me how to use the exported file
and how I can import a .kst in kerkythea

Jeremy

Hi People,

this is what I made of it. Rendered in Kerkythea and the finishing touches with photoshop.

Whow , this is looking good very good.

@unknownuser said:

must say though.... it doesn't look very Dutch!

What does it look like?

@solo said:

Jeremy, it is close but lacks the vibrance of the original, maybe it's a little too saturated and sharpened.

Pete & Dale,

Thanks for the comment. I'll give it another go. maybe more plants and vases.

Hi guys,

This is a second render from another view. It's hard to create the same style. but I'm very close to it, hopefully.

@joppermann said:

I absolutely love it as well. Fantastic illustration style! The composition is sooo good that you don't even notice until you look for it. This style is an absolute winner...I would love to see other work you do with the same style.

Thank you for sharing this...this is easily at the top of my list of favorite work I've seen here.

Whow Jopperman, James, Dylan, Imabzeous, Rickgraham ,

these are the best compliments I 've ever had.
And I can give you the beginning of this picture but the finishing touch,
I'll rather keep it for myself .

And Chris,

thanx, pugz 1983 is the beste friend, we have explored a lot of su techniques, almost every day we are sitting next to each other. for creating a nice workflow. In a big project is it necessary to have the same style in modeling textures and photoshop.

jeremy

![this is the SU file with textures, The textures you'll have to edit in photoshop.

In SU 7.1 there is an option to edit your texture directly in to photoshop, if you save the tex (not save as) your edited tex will appear in to your SU model. How do we get there? first thing we go to windows in SU and open the preferences, choose the applications, and link photoshop.

second thing is to open the material window in SU. Click on a colour, holding crtl and click on the material you want to edit This tex will appear in de material window, go to edit in the Material window and click on the box with a orange arrow. and there it is in photoshop.](/uploads/imported_attachments/sdFM_downinghuis.jpg "this is the SU file with textures, The textures you'll have to edit in photoshop.

In SU 7.1 there is an option to edit your texture directly in to photoshop, if you save the tex (not save as) your edited tex will appear in to your SU model. How do we get there? first thing we go to windows in SU and open the preferences, choose the applications, and link photoshop.

second thing is to open the material window in SU. Click on a colour, holding crtl and click on the material you want to edit This tex will appear in de material window, go to edit in the Material window and click on the box with a orange arrow. and there it is in photoshop.")

Whow thanks Solo ,

I'm very happy you like the styl. it's playing with highlights, saturation, smudging, you know the procedure layer on layer on layer.... . And if you played with it for a couple of hours,
you must say "no further than this" otherweise you'll lose yourself in it.

hi people,

A friend (pugz1983) has given me a book with modern architecture last saterday.
And my eye felt on the downing house. A very nice architecture but
the surrounding is a bit boring, so I restyled it. Hopefully you like it.

Jeremy

@olishea said:

from the cigarette rendering challenge a while back:

lets smoke some grass!

very cool oli

whow kerel, looking good
really nice light

whow very nice scene. love de displacements.

jeremy

@mrmar975 said:

I would like to contribute to the neon cube render challenge. I tried to quickly get something together but rendering Self Luminescence seems to be confusing and difficult to myself. I put together this you-tube video of my Neon Cube.

Wohw it's looking good , only why are you distroying it

jeremy

@pugz1983 said:

Hi everybody,

Here's a bedroom I've been working on. Model made in SU and render done with Indigo. First venture into discplacement . Love some feedback on the scene and render. maybe some tips regarding discplacement mapping. I just made discplacement maps with pix plant 2 and loaded them as external maps indigo. I understand that the input is in m so 0.01 wil be a displacement of 1 cm? the other options in Indigo regarding mesh subdivision I dont understand so I left the as they were.

Greetz Twan

"kerel ziet er goed uit ma dat wist je natuurlijk al. Vind het alleen jammer dat je de noise niet eruit heb gehaald ma daar zal je heust wel een reden voor hebben". en ik begrijp de muren niet waarom je dat boven ingeduwd heb net alsof je een lijst heb. Heeft niet echt toegevoegde waarde het roept alleen vragen op.

Dude, it's looking good, but you already knew. Only thing is, why haven't you despekkle your render.

@mitcorb said:

Sort of like an inspection reticule or loupe?
Now, that would be neat.
And, be able to do editing right in the loupe.

Whow that's even better.