@roger said:
Pichuenke, I feel very uncomfortable correcting someone who is Spanish and lives in Spain and has a degree in architecture (?) but the watercolor I uploaded shows a palace whose grandeur had been defaced by time and public disinterest. The original elegant columns had been simply bricked up to turn an elegant and princely building into a homeless shelter. The columns, as they stand today, are more or less correct. I did have XIX century drawings which are very close to today's reconstruction but just differed in some minor detail but both show monolithic stone columns, but just with minor differences in stylistic detail. Also, not all of the columns are identical, but I decided to forego that in the interest of keeping a lower polygon count.
I have been arguing with my wife about moving to Spain. I am for it. She is against. But we have agreed to visit Cordoba on our next trip.
I knew I had read it somewhere, I have found another reference to the wrong restoration here (Torre de las Damas, also known as El Partal):
http://books.google.es/books?id=z6a4q6rdaA0C&lpg=PA5&pg=PA273#v=onepage&q&f=false
The sentence says in english: "A wrong restauration made in 1965, has replaced those original pillars by the actual columns". I don't want to say that I am right and you are wrong. But I know that there is "something" about those columns.
Another monument of Spain with an excesive reconstruction, with some mistakes, is the roman theatre of Merida, but few people know that. Not good for tourism
Regarding Spain, I live "inside the forest" and my point of view may differ from yours, as you live outside the forest and you can see some things I am not able I believe that the coast may be a good place to live in your retirement, if you have money. But at this moment there is not work, and I am very lucky. I am engineer, not architect. If you want to know more about me, send me a private message.