Thank you: multiplied by a thousand, it's perfect!

Actually, it works better; I tested it elsewhere and the rectangle isolated the face well.

I enlarged it by a factor of 100, but it doesn't work.

yes you are right! I forgot to scale the object... But at the end, I did it manualy

no this zone is not selectable as it should

yes, i need to paint high poly surfaces, hard edges painting, but no way

ce serait tellement bien si ça pouvait marcher un jour....

hello, I have a model with many polylines and the line tool doesn't work... is there a trick?I have a model with many polygons, and the line tool isn't working... is there a trick?
It can't isolate these faces; I've also tried showing the hidden geometry. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.

ok, I will send you the scene. Regarding the issue of geometry not displaying when enclosed in groups and subgroups, if I find an earlier version where I haven't broken everything down inside. As for exposure, there may be aspects I don't fully understand, but generally I have this problem: like in photography, if you take an interior shot focused on objects, your window will be white, with saturated light. If you focus on the window, the outside landscape, a digital camera will make the interior extremely dark so you can see the trees and the garden. Just like the human eye. Except our eyes are very fast and correct in microseconds, which allows us to see both the exterior and the interior so clearly. That's light sensitivity. If there's a way...

On this page I show a comparison slider between the original rendering and the changes that Magnific Upscale adds

https://jskup.fr/comparatif-rayscaper-magnific-upscale/

Of course, we then have to go back through Photoshop to correct the errors that the upscaling process generates.

Thomas, you asked me why I apply an upscale layer after a ray-scaping render. For scenes with windows, I have to do two renders, like a photographer: a light one for the room's exposure and a dark one to replace the "blown-out," overexposed parts of the window. D5 Render doesn't have this problem because its renders aren't truly photographic; they're a kind of pseudo-pathtracing.

I finally understand how to use the denoiser. You might initially think that a low-resolution render will be calculated faster... But actually, when the denoiser is applied during rendering, especially when the render resolution is high, the denoising is very clean.
It might seem obvious to you, but it took me a while to figure it out. So I leave the denoiser at full power and immediately set the render size to 2k or higher.

Hi,
anyway, it's fixed, the latest version installed correctly.

As for objects on hidden tags, it's still the same; objects on hidden tags in the SU viewport are displayed in the Rayscaper render.

Hi,
when I display a SketchUp scene in RS, the hidden tags within that scene are still visible.

And there's still this problem with certain groups containing other groups and components that don't display unless everything inside is exploded. And I can't always explode everything, as I have variations to make in subsequent steps.
And i no graphic card

Twilight render was great, but Rayscaper is marvelous compared to it.
I can give you the last version of Twilight

are you both talking about Twilight render ?

However, I had installed it correctly without any problems before.

No, I did get a window indicating a problem loading the Rayscaper extension, but it hasn't reappeared.

I had to uninstall the extension store and I got an error message from Rayscaper.
And now I'm having the same problem again after reinstalling Rayscaper 9.77.

thanks, great !