I almost thought so...
But fixing the clipping error is also an improvement for my work.
Especially for perspective exterior views in narrow lanes or interior views in models with large extension and activated shadows.
Thanks for addressing the issue.

If I switch to perspective view an back to parallel projection SketchUp zooms to the extents of the visible geometry.
I then have to manually adjust the original framing of the view for each scene.
There are no problems with perspective exterior or interior views, only with parallel projections.

Currently trying to switch from SketchUp 2021 to SketchUp 2022.
In most architectural and city models are scenes with orthogonal representations (site plans, floor plans, elevations, isometrics).
After opening SUp2021 models in SUp2022, the models in these scenes are either completely invisible or cut away in the background.
See the scene pictures below.
This is probably related to the changes made to avoid the "clipping" problem.
The only way I can fix this so far is to switch to perspective projection, back to parallel projection, and zoom to approximately the previous section for each scene.
In models with many scenes, this is very time-consuming, not very creative, not productive and the effort is difficult to explain to my boss...
Is there an easier or faster way to solve this problem?

Architects and urban planners will be happy to have a quick and easy tool to model existing buildings and interiors. Hopefully it will also be cheaper than 3D laser scanners.

It works for me.
See attached model.

Model SketchUp 2017 Make

I use VirtualDub by Avery Lee to create avi files from jpg or png images.
For mp4 films I use shotcut.
Both are free.
FFmpeg is integrated in shotcut.

Looks like it's going backwards ...

Incredible, crazy. With a little more engine power and if it could swim it would be a fancy motorhome ...
And of course a great modeling job from you.

Absolutely outstanding work.
Great simulation with no showmanship.
How many man-years are in it?

Here are some test results for new water and wave effects with SketchUp 2017 Make and MSPhysics.
Just for fun, entertainment, and a reminder of old skills.
Also to test the limits of the program and the great plugin and to expand them a little ...
I had some time due to a positive C19 test result - despite 2 vaccinations.
Had to stay at home for 1.5 weeks ... But the day after tomorrow I survived the infection and I can stroll out of the house to work again.

Thank you very much. Worked. But that is an unusual approach. Does this mean that inaction while using SketchUp is punished?

SketchUp Pro 2021 can be opened, but Layout Pro 2021 cannot.
A window pops up with the question: "Ready to start your free 30-day trial period?"
But I'm registered and my subscription runs until March 18, 2023.
Does anyone have similar problems or even better - a solution?

That sounds great!

Scary mood ... fresh minced beef for my cat ...
Is a blender animation planned or in progress?

These examples remind me of experiments with MSPhysics from 2017.
Here I had the sail aninated by means of randomly switched on and off subgroups.
The individual phases of the sail were previously modeled as a group.
A dream would be an integration of ClothWorks in MSPhysics.
A little bit of wind would of course not be bad ...

Since my problem seems to be an isolated case, I decided to manually reassign the scenes to the paper windows correctly.
Fortunately, all of the other layout settings such as scale, styles, etc. were still there.
Nevertheless, thanks for the hints.

It would be helpful to see the LayOut file.:
Unfortunately the model has 130 MB and the LO file 250 MB ...
With smaller layout files, the manual reassignment of the scenes to the viewports is also easier than with files with 60 viewports.

Did you make changes in the file back in 2016 that resulted in the scenes being shown as modified?:
No, Scenes are not shown as changed when opening the 2016 model.

If you open the 2016 version of the file in 2021, does the Camera section or other sections of the SketchUp Model panel show with a dark gray background?:
Yes, on some pages the Camera, Effects and Style sections are shown with a gray background, but the assigned scene is correct.
By clicking the "Back" button, I can cancel the deposit.

As I said, with the model from 2016, Layout 2021 works flawlessly.
I converted this model from 2016 into a 2021 model with my new SU2021 one-to-one.
The converted model from SU2021 does not work in Layout 2021.
The model scenes are apparently randomly assigned to the layout windows.

Problems with the adoption of SketchUp 2016 layout files in SketchUp 2021:

1. Opening a LO 2016 file in LO 2021 with the link to the old SU 2016 model works.
2. Opening the SU 2016 model in SU 2021 and saving it as an SU 2021 model with unchanged scenes (is no problem).
3. Linking the LO 2021 file with the new SU 2021 model leads to the following errors: The model display windows are assigned completely incorrect scenes.
   This means that you must manually reassign every corresponding scene individually.
   What am I doing wrong?
   Thanks in advance for help.

Hello Anton,
I hope you are fine and as a programming and physics genius you have a lot to do ...
My questions:
Is it feasible to make the existing (ingenious) MSPhysics compatible with SketchUp 2021 and what effort would that require?
SketchUp and Ruby API have changed a few times in the meantime.
Could outsiders with more or less programming knowledge help you? Possibly also financially.
You're working on a new version. Can someone help you with testing?
Otherwise, porting the last version v1.0.3 to SUp2021 would be very helpful, as you already have to keep 3 SketchUp versions:
SUp2016 32bit for Sketchy Physics, SUp2017Make for MSPhysics and the current SUp version for daily work.
I hope the users' interest in exercises and simulations on a physical basis for SketchUp does not wane.
Since SketchUp is only available in paid versions anyway and since more and more professional plugins are chargeable, this would also be conceivable for MSPhysics.
Well, moaned enough.
Best regards, Andreas

It works now. Thank you TIG.