Rayscaper New Releases
-
@ntxdave - In your test file, it had a ton of geometry generated in the model. If I tried to re-create your scene again, step-by-step I got this:

Can you try to just generate the grass on the plane, a first step and see if that works?
As a sanity check, you are using Rayscaper 0.9.72?
-
Great!
-
@pixelcruncher said in Rayscaper New Releases:
As a sanity check, you are using Rayscaper 0.9.72?
Yes, I have updated to Rayscaper 0.9.72. I am having ongoing problems. I will let you know more when I can. I will try to create a very basic file and show what I am see both if I generate in model and with render only.
It is probably going to be much later though. I want to get to the bottom of the problem(s) I am seeing.
-
@ntxdave Sounds good!
-
Rayscaper 0.9.71 renders / Photoshop / Nano Banana for the characters / Magnific Upscale


-
Compared to D5 Render Plus and D5 Render AI Enhancement, it's much better
D5 is faster, but its path tracing is a sham
https://jskup.fr/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/scene-6.FB_.jpg -
Compared to D5 Render Plus and D5 Render AI Enhancement, it's very mediocre!
What exactly is mediocre, or what are you missing? That helps me improve the software. Now I can only guess at what's mediocre compared to D5 render.
Cheers,
Thomas -
Sorry Pixelcruncher, that's my faulty translation... I really want to highlight Rayscaper! I love the photorealistic quality of RS's path tracing. I meant the opposite in my post and I've corrected it.
-
Sorry Pixelcruncher, that's my faulty translation... I really want to highlight Rayscaper! I love the photorealistic quality of RS's path tracing. I meant the opposite in my post and I've corrected it.
Phew
I'm happy you like it! -
I made a blunder, but my post has been corrected.
Advertisement