Medeek Wall Plugin

gullfo

one option might be to have the handrails independent of the riser sections. you could create a stair assembly from whatever your stair setup is (like a component with unified stair metadata inside it), then add the handrails over the entire structure - which could be a continuous rail or segmented, etc. might be easier to code it this way by reading the overall stair assembly metadata and use that to generate the handrails.

medeek

Version 3.7.9 - 12.26.2024

Added the inverted T-Shape landing.
Enabled straight and curved flared staircases.
Added 37 handrail fittings into the built-in handrail fittings library.
Updated the handrail module with additional parameters for over-the-post handrail systems.
Enabled additional handrail sub-menus for multi-landing stair assemblies.

medeek

Tutorial 57 - Over-the-Post Handrails and Fittings (18.42 min.)

medeek

Version 3.8.0 - 12.30.2024

Enabled open tread staircases.
Added sub-menus for multiple stair runs for open treads.
Added the following starter steps: square, full round and half round.
Added a return parameter for square cut starter steps.
Enabled flared handrails (over-the-post) for straight and curved flared staircases.

medeek

Tutorial 58 - Open Treads and Starter Steps (7:35 min.)

TIG

Is there a way to increase the size of the top-landing or intermediate-landings so that the nosings are one tread dim offset ?
That way the handrail turns properly - smoothly without a vertical drop.
Some localities' codes require the landings to be a tread or 300mm bigger than the stair's width.
Also extending the handrail a similar amount at the top and bottom is required...

Separately... the FollowMe twisting of the profile along complex paths is longstanding.
Extensions like Upright Extruder sidestep this; so you need to emulate those...