sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Plugins
    926 Posts 171 Posters 883.2k Views 172 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A Offline
      Anton_S
      last edited by

      @jumpjack said:

      Does it exist a library of mechanisms for MSP? I can find only a dozen models on warehouse.

      As mentioned earlier, MSPhysics 1 has weak joints, in which case creating mechanical interconnections between rods, suspension, robotic arms, and what not, makes the resulting structure weak and loose, unless all interconnected groups have an identical mass. MSPhysics 2 should be able to address this issue. I haven't yet tested that, and I am a little behind with my promises on the development of the project, but as mentioned earlier, I am very exited to utilize the newer NewtonDynamics version for this, which showed promising results with the stable and robust interlinked joint behavior.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T Offline
        tayyab2224
        last edited by

        @anton_s said:

        @jumpjack said:

        Does it exist a library of mechanisms for MSP? I can find only a dozen models on warehouse.

        As mentioned earlier, MSPhysics 1 has weak joints, in which case creating mechanical interconnections between rods, suspension, robotic arms, and what not, makes the resulting structure weak and loose, unless all interconnected groups have an identical mass. MSPhysics 2 should be able to address this issue. I haven't yet tested that, and I am a little behind with my promises on the development of the project, but as mentioned earlier, I am very exited to utilize the newer NewtonDynamics version for this, which showed promising results with the stable and robust interlinked joint behavior.

        I hope we will enjoy MSP2 this summer۔۔۔

        M. Tayyab

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • D Offline
          daniabreu1
          last edited by

          Looking forward to see the new version of this plugin that it will work on new versions of SU. Keep updating us! Thank you! 😄

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • T Offline
            tayyab2224
            last edited by

            What if flying simulation in msp2 ?

            M. Tayyab

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A Offline
              Anton_S
              last edited by

              @tayyab2224 said:

              What if flying simulation in msp2 ?
              You mean aerodynamics? I am planning to implement Newtonian drag (already developed in ClothWorks for simulating flags and parachute effects). Newtonian drag alone does not provide accurate results, as it does not involve turbulence and additional actors, but should yield useful results for simulating wings.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S Offline
                sheadacus
                last edited by

                Hello is there anyway to combine a slider and servo motor. Similar to the corkscrew but I need it to move apart automatically in twisting and sliding a certain distance and angle. Whenever I do a slider I cant move the servo and vice versa.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A Offline
                  Anton_S
                  last edited by

                  @sheadacus said:

                  Hello is there anyway to combine a slider and servo motor. Similar to the corkscrew but I need it to move apart automatically in twisting and sliding a certain distance and angle. Whenever I do a slider I cant move the servo and vice versa.

                  Hi! Yes, there is. To do this, you need two groups. One way to do this is by having slider as a top level joint and servo as an inner level joint:

                  1. Create two box groups positioned next to each other.
                  2. Create a slider joint at the top level, next to group A.
                  3. Create a servo joint, one level inside group A.
                  4. Using the joint connection tool, connect servo to group B.
                  5. Then, connect slider to group A.
                    In this scenario, group A will be constrained to the slider and group B will be constrained to a servo, with respect to group A.
                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M Offline
                    mauroa6
                    last edited by

                    Good morning
                    I installed MSPhysic 1.0.3 and related AMS 3.6.0h libraries, but when opening SketchUp I get this error ...
                    Thanks

                    Errore di caricamento del file C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main_entry.rb
                    Error: #<IOError: The required, staged c extension file, "C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/libraries/stage/win64/2.5/msp_lib.so", is missing!>
                    C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:204:in block in require_all' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:201:in each'
                    C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:201:in require_all' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main.rb:70:in <top (required)>'
                    C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/RubyStdLib/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:59:in require' C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/RubyStdLib/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:59:in require'
                    C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main_entry.rb:15:in <top (required)>' C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/extensions.rb:197:in require'
                    C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/extensions.rb:197:in load' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:21:in register_extension'
                    C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:21:in <module:MSPhysics>' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:5:in <top (required)>'

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • T Offline
                      tayyab2224
                      last edited by

                      @mauroa6 said:

                      Good morning
                      I installed MSPhysic 1.0.3 and related AMS 3.6.0h libraries, but when opening SketchUp I get this error ...
                      Thanks

                      Errore di caricamento del file C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main_entry.rb
                      Error: #<IOError: The required, staged c extension file, "C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/libraries/stage/win64/2.5/msp_lib.so", is missing!>
                      C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:204:in block in require_all' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:201:in each'
                      C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:201:in require_all' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main.rb:70:in <top (required)>'
                      C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/RubyStdLib/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:59:in require' C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/RubyStdLib/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:59:in require'
                      C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main_entry.rb:15:in <top (required)>' C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/extensions.rb:197:in require'
                      C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/extensions.rb:197:in load' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:21:in register_extension'
                      C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:21:in <module:MSPhysics>' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:5:in <top (required)>'

                      MsP NOT WORKS IN 2017-2020.

                      M. Tayyab

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • OxerO Offline
                        Oxer
                        last edited by

                        MSPhysic doesn't work in SketchUp > 2017 but in SU2017 works fine.

                        "The result is the end what is important is the process" by Oxer
                        [http://www.oxervision.blogspot.com/(http://www.oxervision.blogspot.com/)]

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • S Offline
                          skeeterkalamazoo
                          last edited by

                          Hello,
                          I saw a way to use this to create a walkthrough exactly like I used to be able to do it in an old architect software I had. I can't get it this, or the AMS library to work, just gets a list of errors. I have SketchUp 2020 on a Windows 10 Machine, I'm guessing it is a compatibility issue with either of those. Any ideas? If it requires an update to the plugins, do you have any plans to do that?

                          It will be a real bummer if I have to figure out a different way to do this. I have a lot of difficulty having animations turn out right just using the built in ability with scenes.
                          Thanks,
                          Skeeter

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • A Offline
                            Anton_S
                            last edited by

                            Hello, Skeeter. I mentioned this earlier, but MSPhysics is not compatible with 2019+. I am working on 2.0, from scratch. This is one of the reasons it takes too long to release. I hope to have a working version in June or July. Thanks!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • N Offline
                              nisel
                              last edited by

                              Is it possible to create an animation like that; Disappear or appear an object after 5 seconds?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • U Offline
                                utsav1110
                                last edited by

                                Can anyone help me with this simulation of multiple plastic bottles over a conveyor?
                                I need to know the flow of bottles over the conveyor. Whenever i run the simulation, it crashes.
                                Don't know the reason.

                                Also, if possible how can i model a simple flat belt that runs instead of this chain type belt. I have attached the file which i modelled in sketchup pro 2017.


                                segmented conveyor.skp

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • C Offline
                                  cristyan
                                  last edited by

                                  Hello ! utsav1110 here is an conveyor chain. You can use it if can help you.


                                  conveyor_chain.skp

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • J Offline
                                    Jorgensen
                                    last edited by

                                    @anton_s said:

                                    .......is one of the reasons it takes too long to release. I hope to have a working version in June or July. Thanks!

                                    Hi Anton

                                    Is there some newsletter - or like, we can subscript to, to be informed when you release the next version? 😄

                                    Jorgensen

                                    sketchup pro 2016 16.1.1449 64 bit | windows 10 pro | i7-3770k @3.5 GHz | 16gb ram | gtx 780 ti / gtx 980 ti | nvidia driver 368.39

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • A Offline
                                      Anton_S
                                      last edited by

                                      @jorgensen said:

                                      @anton_s said:

                                      .......is one of the reasons it takes too long to release. I hope to have a working version in June or July. Thanks!

                                      Hi Anton

                                      Is there some newsletter - or like, we can subscript to, to be informed when you release the next version? 😄

                                      Jorgensen

                                      Hi Jorgensen,

                                      There isn't any newsletters. Looks like I am falling behind on schedule with this one. Will do my best.

                                      Thanks,
                                      Anton

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • pilouP Offline
                                        pilou
                                        last edited by

                                        For your tests 😄
                                        Put your links as you want...
                                        25.jpg

                                        Wanted 2 curves...

                                        2curves.jpg


                                        25.skp

                                        Frenchy Pilou
                                        Is beautiful that please without concept!
                                        My Little site :)

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • pilouP Offline
                                          pilou
                                          last edited by

                                          As it's very easy to make this, ☀ it's a nightmare to make a simple grid with the same "Prismatic" module! 😮 (2 curvatures in the same time)

                                          After tones of traying no success! I must miss something!
                                          Have you some lights about that ?

                                          GIF_4-5.gif


                                          scorpion_v6.skp

                                          Frenchy Pilou
                                          Is beautiful that please without concept!
                                          My Little site :)

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • pilouP Offline
                                            pilou
                                            last edited by

                                            Sorry bad hypothesis ! 😳

                                            That can't work with these prisms!
                                            There are overlapings!
                                            Works for 2 perpendicular "lines" but not for a checkerboard! 😛

                                            Here with a pyramid with 5° basis

                                            Tronque.jpg

                                            Frenchy Pilou
                                            Is beautiful that please without concept!
                                            My Little site :)

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 8
                                            • 9
                                            • 10
                                            • 11
                                            • 12
                                            • 46
                                            • 47
                                            • 10 / 47
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Buy SketchPlus
                                            Buy SUbD
                                            Buy WrapR
                                            Buy eBook
                                            Buy Modelur
                                            Buy Vertex Tools
                                            Buy SketchCuisine
                                            Buy FormFonts

                                            Advertisement