I was playing with amslib and msphysics plugin for an week and I have successfully compiled ams_l8b.so and msp_lib.so compatible to the SketchUp 2026 and fixed many warnings and errors.. it is now working good, but still I have to test all functions, if someone of you want to help me out to text all these so it will be easy and take less time, here is my [REDACTED WHATSAPP]
I will send you a copy of working amslib and msphysics.
Best posts made by tayyab2224
-
RE: MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)
Latest posts made by tayyab2224
-
RE: MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)
I was playing with amslib and msphysics plugin for an week and I have successfully compiled ams_l8b.so and msp_lib.so compatible to the SketchUp 2026 and fixed many warnings and errors.. it is now working good, but still I have to test all functions, if someone of you want to help me out to text all these so it will be easy and take less time, here is my [REDACTED WHATSAPP]
I will send you a copy of working amslib and msphysics. -
RE: MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)
@mauroa6 said:
Good morning
I installed MSPhysic 1.0.3 and related AMS 3.6.0h libraries, but when opening SketchUp I get this error ...
ThanksErrore di caricamento del file C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main_entry.rb
Error: #<IOError: The required, staged c extension file, "C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/libraries/stage/win64/2.5/msp_lib.so", is missing!>
C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:204:inblock in require_all' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:201:ineach'
C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:201:inrequire_all' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main.rb:70:in<top (required)>'
C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/RubyStdLib/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:59:inrequire' C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/RubyStdLib/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:59:inrequire'
C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main_entry.rb:15:in<top (required)>' C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/extensions.rb:197:inrequire'
C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/extensions.rb:197:inload' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:21:inregister_extension'
C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:21:in<module:MSPhysics>' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:5:in<top (required)>'MsP NOT WORKS IN 2017-2020.
-
RE: MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)
@anton_s said:
@jumpjack said:
Does it exist a library of mechanisms for MSP? I can find only a dozen models on warehouse.
As mentioned earlier, MSPhysics 1 has weak joints, in which case creating mechanical interconnections between rods, suspension, robotic arms, and what not, makes the resulting structure weak and loose, unless all interconnected groups have an identical mass. MSPhysics 2 should be able to address this issue. I haven't yet tested that, and I am a little behind with my promises on the development of the project, but as mentioned earlier, I am very exited to utilize the newer NewtonDynamics version for this, which showed promising results with the stable and robust interlinked joint behavior.
I hope we will enjoy MSP2 this summer۔۔۔
-
RE: MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)
As far as i know , it is not possible in this version, anton_s might be busy anywhere else .
-
RE: MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)
It's been so long when started using Ms physics tool and I have learned so many things from developers but the thing is found on YouTube or over here , is flying an object like helicopter and air plane,
J have downloaded a model of an air plane, the plane can fly yeah, sketchyphysics is used in that model, the I want to ask is, how can do that in Ms physics?