sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login

    MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    Plugins
    170
    919
    882.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • F
      faust07
      last edited by

      Thanks for the information on the further development of MSPhysics. That sounds great. Will the old models be compatible with the new version?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • A
        Anton_S
        last edited by

        @faust07 said:

        Thanks for the information on the further development of MSPhysics. That sounds great. Will the old models be compatible with the new version?

        Unfortunately MSPhysics 2 won't be compatible with current models. This time, any object intended for simulation will have to be marked explicitly, rather than excluding unwanted with the Ignore option. Scripting docs is going to be different as well. My intention is to focus on usability and tutorials with this one.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H
          Hza
          last edited by

          Hello Anton, thanks for the great extension! Please, when we can expect release of the MSPhysics 2?
          thanks again!
          Hza

          @anton_s said:

          @faust07 said:

          Thanks for the information on the further development of MSPhysics. That sounds great. Will the old models be compatible with the new version?

          Unfortunately MSPhysics 2 won't be compatible with current models. This time, any object intended for simulation will have to be marked explicitly, rather than excluding unwanted with the Ignore option. Scripting docs is going to be different as well. My intention is to focus on usability and tutorials with this one.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A
            Anton_S
            last edited by

            @hza said:

            Hello Anton, thanks for the great extension! Please, when we can expect release of the MSPhysics 2?
            thanks again!
            Hza

            The first beta version should be ready in a few months.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J
              jumpjack
              last edited by

              Does it exist a library of mechanisms for MSP? I can find only a dozen models on warehouse.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • K
                kaoru_komine
                last edited by

                I am commenting for the first time.
                Thanks to the author for the great plugin.
                I'm looking forward to the new version of "MSPhysics".

                Now, I have a question about "MSPhysics2".
                I use Ruby scripts that can be input from the UI to control the 3D model in the current "MSPhysics".Is it possible to do the same thing with "MSPhysics2"?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A
                  Anton_S
                  last edited by

                  @kaoru_komine said:

                  I use Ruby scripts that can be input from the UI to control the 3D model in the current "MSPhysics".Is it possible to do the same thing with "MSPhysics2"?

                  Yes, scripting will still be available with MSPhysics2. The scripting API will be different, however.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A
                    Anton_S
                    last edited by

                    @jumpjack said:

                    Does it exist a library of mechanisms for MSP? I can find only a dozen models on warehouse.

                    As mentioned earlier, MSPhysics 1 has weak joints, in which case creating mechanical interconnections between rods, suspension, robotic arms, and what not, makes the resulting structure weak and loose, unless all interconnected groups have an identical mass. MSPhysics 2 should be able to address this issue. I haven't yet tested that, and I am a little behind with my promises on the development of the project, but as mentioned earlier, I am very exited to utilize the newer NewtonDynamics version for this, which showed promising results with the stable and robust interlinked joint behavior.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • T
                      tayyab2224
                      last edited by

                      @anton_s said:

                      @jumpjack said:

                      Does it exist a library of mechanisms for MSP? I can find only a dozen models on warehouse.

                      As mentioned earlier, MSPhysics 1 has weak joints, in which case creating mechanical interconnections between rods, suspension, robotic arms, and what not, makes the resulting structure weak and loose, unless all interconnected groups have an identical mass. MSPhysics 2 should be able to address this issue. I haven't yet tested that, and I am a little behind with my promises on the development of the project, but as mentioned earlier, I am very exited to utilize the newer NewtonDynamics version for this, which showed promising results with the stable and robust interlinked joint behavior.

                      I hope we will enjoy MSP2 this summer۔۔۔

                      M. Tayyab

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • D
                        daniabreu1
                        last edited by

                        Looking forward to see the new version of this plugin that it will work on new versions of SU. Keep updating us! Thank you! 😄

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • T
                          tayyab2224
                          last edited by

                          What if flying simulation in msp2 ?

                          M. Tayyab

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • A
                            Anton_S
                            last edited by

                            @tayyab2224 said:

                            What if flying simulation in msp2 ?
                            You mean aerodynamics? I am planning to implement Newtonian drag (already developed in ClothWorks for simulating flags and parachute effects). Newtonian drag alone does not provide accurate results, as it does not involve turbulence and additional actors, but should yield useful results for simulating wings.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              sheadacus
                              last edited by

                              Hello is there anyway to combine a slider and servo motor. Similar to the corkscrew but I need it to move apart automatically in twisting and sliding a certain distance and angle. Whenever I do a slider I cant move the servo and vice versa.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • A
                                Anton_S
                                last edited by

                                @sheadacus said:

                                Hello is there anyway to combine a slider and servo motor. Similar to the corkscrew but I need it to move apart automatically in twisting and sliding a certain distance and angle. Whenever I do a slider I cant move the servo and vice versa.

                                Hi! Yes, there is. To do this, you need two groups. One way to do this is by having slider as a top level joint and servo as an inner level joint:

                                1. Create two box groups positioned next to each other.
                                2. Create a slider joint at the top level, next to group A.
                                3. Create a servo joint, one level inside group A.
                                4. Using the joint connection tool, connect servo to group B.
                                5. Then, connect slider to group A.
                                  In this scenario, group A will be constrained to the slider and group B will be constrained to a servo, with respect to group A.
                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • M
                                  mauroa6
                                  last edited by

                                  Good morning
                                  I installed MSPhysic 1.0.3 and related AMS 3.6.0h libraries, but when opening SketchUp I get this error ...
                                  Thanks

                                  Errore di caricamento del file C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main_entry.rb
                                  Error: #<IOError: The required, staged c extension file, "C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/libraries/stage/win64/2.5/msp_lib.so", is missing!>
                                  C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:204:in block in require_all' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:201:in each'
                                  C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:201:in require_all' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main.rb:70:in <top (required)>'
                                  C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/RubyStdLib/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:59:in require' C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/RubyStdLib/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:59:in require'
                                  C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main_entry.rb:15:in <top (required)>' C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/extensions.rb:197:in require'
                                  C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/extensions.rb:197:in load' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:21:in register_extension'
                                  C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:21:in <module:MSPhysics>' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:5:in <top (required)>'

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • T
                                    tayyab2224
                                    last edited by

                                    @mauroa6 said:

                                    Good morning
                                    I installed MSPhysic 1.0.3 and related AMS 3.6.0h libraries, but when opening SketchUp I get this error ...
                                    Thanks

                                    Errore di caricamento del file C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main_entry.rb
                                    Error: #<IOError: The required, staged c extension file, "C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/libraries/stage/win64/2.5/msp_lib.so", is missing!>
                                    C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:204:in block in require_all' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:201:in each'
                                    C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:201:in require_all' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main.rb:70:in <top (required)>'
                                    C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/RubyStdLib/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:59:in require' C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/RubyStdLib/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:59:in require'
                                    C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main_entry.rb:15:in <top (required)>' C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/extensions.rb:197:in require'
                                    C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/extensions.rb:197:in load' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:21:in register_extension'
                                    C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:21:in <module:MSPhysics>' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:5:in <top (required)>'

                                    MsP NOT WORKS IN 2017-2020.

                                    M. Tayyab

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • OxerO
                                      Oxer
                                      last edited by

                                      MSPhysic doesn't work in SketchUp > 2017 but in SU2017 works fine.

                                      "The result is the end what is important is the process" by Oxer
                                      [http://www.oxervision.blogspot.com/(http://www.oxervision.blogspot.com/)]

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • S
                                        skeeterkalamazoo
                                        last edited by

                                        Hello,
                                        I saw a way to use this to create a walkthrough exactly like I used to be able to do it in an old architect software I had. I can't get it this, or the AMS library to work, just gets a list of errors. I have SketchUp 2020 on a Windows 10 Machine, I'm guessing it is a compatibility issue with either of those. Any ideas? If it requires an update to the plugins, do you have any plans to do that?

                                        It will be a real bummer if I have to figure out a different way to do this. I have a lot of difficulty having animations turn out right just using the built in ability with scenes.
                                        Thanks,
                                        Skeeter

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • A
                                          Anton_S
                                          last edited by

                                          Hello, Skeeter. I mentioned this earlier, but MSPhysics is not compatible with 2019+. I am working on 2.0, from scratch. This is one of the reasons it takes too long to release. I hope to have a working version in June or July. Thanks!

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • N
                                            nisel
                                            last edited by

                                            Is it possible to create an animation like that; Disappear or appear an object after 5 seconds?

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 41
                                            • 42
                                            • 43
                                            • 44
                                            • 45
                                            • 46
                                            • 43 / 46
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Buy SketchPlus
                                            Buy SUbD
                                            Buy WrapR
                                            Buy eBook
                                            Buy Modelur
                                            Buy Vertex Tools
                                            Buy SketchCuisine
                                            Buy FormFonts

                                            Advertisement