• Login
sketchucation logo sketchucation
  • Login
ℹ️ GoFundMe | Our friend Gus Robatto needs some help in a challenging time Learn More

MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Plugins
920 Posts 170 Posters 882.8k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • W Offline
    WronskiKamil
    last edited by 30 Oct 2019, 22:37

    Hi,
    Will it be possible to export the animation to vray in the future? Maybe in the next version;)?

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • J Offline
      jeep906
      last edited by 8 Jan 2020, 10:15

      Dear author! I apologize for my English, I translate Google translator.
      Is it possible to save the properties of individual objects defined in the MSPhysics UI tool when combining these objects into a common group?
      if there is no such possibility in this plugin, I am ready to pay for writing a new one, where there is such an opportunity. Please help me!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T Offline
        tayyab2224
        last edited by 10 Jan 2020, 15:03

        As far as i know , it is not possible in this version, anton_s might be busy anywhere else .

        M. Tayyab

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A Offline
          Anton_S
          last edited by 11 Jan 2020, 01:55

          @jeep906 said:

          Dear author! I apologize for my English, I translate Google translator.
          Is it possible to save the properties of individual objects defined in the MSPhysics UI tool when combining these objects into a common group?
          if there is no such possibility in this plugin, I am ready to pay for writing a new one, where there is such an opportunity. Please help me!

          With the current version, it is not possible to assign properties to internal groups. The new version, that I am developing, will support this functionality.

          @tayyab2224 said:

          As far as i know , it is not possible in this version, anton_s might be busy anywhere else .

          I am honestly working on the project, just not as actively. I have been focused on other things. NewtonDynamics, the physics engine used by MSPhysics, has become much more stable and robust with joints than before. We will no longer experience the weird behavior of those flexible and wandering joints and have much better experience with developing robotics. I am driven to develop the new version. Thanks for your interest in the project!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • F Offline
            faust07
            last edited by 11 Jan 2020, 13:53

            Thanks for the information on the further development of MSPhysics. That sounds great. Will the old models be compatible with the new version?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • A Offline
              Anton_S
              last edited by 12 Jan 2020, 01:05

              @faust07 said:

              Thanks for the information on the further development of MSPhysics. That sounds great. Will the old models be compatible with the new version?

              Unfortunately MSPhysics 2 won't be compatible with current models. This time, any object intended for simulation will have to be marked explicitly, rather than excluding unwanted with the Ignore option. Scripting docs is going to be different as well. My intention is to focus on usability and tutorials with this one.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • H Offline
                Hza
                last edited by 12 Jan 2020, 01:37

                Hello Anton, thanks for the great extension! Please, when we can expect release of the MSPhysics 2?
                thanks again!
                Hza

                @anton_s said:

                @faust07 said:

                Thanks for the information on the further development of MSPhysics. That sounds great. Will the old models be compatible with the new version?

                Unfortunately MSPhysics 2 won't be compatible with current models. This time, any object intended for simulation will have to be marked explicitly, rather than excluding unwanted with the Ignore option. Scripting docs is going to be different as well. My intention is to focus on usability and tutorials with this one.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A Offline
                  Anton_S
                  last edited by 13 Jan 2020, 23:21

                  @hza said:

                  Hello Anton, thanks for the great extension! Please, when we can expect release of the MSPhysics 2?
                  thanks again!
                  Hza

                  The first beta version should be ready in a few months.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J Offline
                    jumpjack
                    last edited by 31 Jan 2020, 18:33

                    Does it exist a library of mechanisms for MSP? I can find only a dozen models on warehouse.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • K Offline
                      kaoru_komine
                      last edited by 29 Mar 2020, 02:13

                      I am commenting for the first time.
                      Thanks to the author for the great plugin.
                      I'm looking forward to the new version of "MSPhysics".

                      Now, I have a question about "MSPhysics2".
                      I use Ruby scripts that can be input from the UI to control the 3D model in the current "MSPhysics".Is it possible to do the same thing with "MSPhysics2"?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • A Offline
                        Anton_S
                        last edited by 1 Apr 2020, 23:00

                        @kaoru_komine said:

                        I use Ruby scripts that can be input from the UI to control the 3D model in the current "MSPhysics".Is it possible to do the same thing with "MSPhysics2"?

                        Yes, scripting will still be available with MSPhysics2. The scripting API will be different, however.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • A Offline
                          Anton_S
                          last edited by 1 Apr 2020, 23:14

                          @jumpjack said:

                          Does it exist a library of mechanisms for MSP? I can find only a dozen models on warehouse.

                          As mentioned earlier, MSPhysics 1 has weak joints, in which case creating mechanical interconnections between rods, suspension, robotic arms, and what not, makes the resulting structure weak and loose, unless all interconnected groups have an identical mass. MSPhysics 2 should be able to address this issue. I haven't yet tested that, and I am a little behind with my promises on the development of the project, but as mentioned earlier, I am very exited to utilize the newer NewtonDynamics version for this, which showed promising results with the stable and robust interlinked joint behavior.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • T Offline
                            tayyab2224
                            last edited by 2 Apr 2020, 08:54

                            @anton_s said:

                            @jumpjack said:

                            Does it exist a library of mechanisms for MSP? I can find only a dozen models on warehouse.

                            As mentioned earlier, MSPhysics 1 has weak joints, in which case creating mechanical interconnections between rods, suspension, robotic arms, and what not, makes the resulting structure weak and loose, unless all interconnected groups have an identical mass. MSPhysics 2 should be able to address this issue. I haven't yet tested that, and I am a little behind with my promises on the development of the project, but as mentioned earlier, I am very exited to utilize the newer NewtonDynamics version for this, which showed promising results with the stable and robust interlinked joint behavior.

                            I hope we will enjoy MSP2 this summer۔۔۔

                            M. Tayyab

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • D Offline
                              daniabreu1
                              last edited by 3 Apr 2020, 19:04

                              Looking forward to see the new version of this plugin that it will work on new versions of SU. Keep updating us! Thank you! 😄

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • T Offline
                                tayyab2224
                                last edited by 6 Apr 2020, 16:53

                                What if flying simulation in msp2 ?

                                M. Tayyab

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • A Offline
                                  Anton_S
                                  last edited by 7 Apr 2020, 06:52

                                  @tayyab2224 said:

                                  What if flying simulation in msp2 ?
                                  You mean aerodynamics? I am planning to implement Newtonian drag (already developed in ClothWorks for simulating flags and parachute effects). Newtonian drag alone does not provide accurate results, as it does not involve turbulence and additional actors, but should yield useful results for simulating wings.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • S Offline
                                    sheadacus
                                    last edited by 17 Apr 2020, 01:03

                                    Hello is there anyway to combine a slider and servo motor. Similar to the corkscrew but I need it to move apart automatically in twisting and sliding a certain distance and angle. Whenever I do a slider I cant move the servo and vice versa.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • A Offline
                                      Anton_S
                                      last edited by 20 Apr 2020, 06:30

                                      @sheadacus said:

                                      Hello is there anyway to combine a slider and servo motor. Similar to the corkscrew but I need it to move apart automatically in twisting and sliding a certain distance and angle. Whenever I do a slider I cant move the servo and vice versa.

                                      Hi! Yes, there is. To do this, you need two groups. One way to do this is by having slider as a top level joint and servo as an inner level joint:

                                      1. Create two box groups positioned next to each other.
                                      2. Create a slider joint at the top level, next to group A.
                                      3. Create a servo joint, one level inside group A.
                                      4. Using the joint connection tool, connect servo to group B.
                                      5. Then, connect slider to group A.
                                        In this scenario, group A will be constrained to the slider and group B will be constrained to a servo, with respect to group A.
                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • M Offline
                                        mauroa6
                                        last edited by 7 May 2020, 07:09

                                        Good morning
                                        I installed MSPhysic 1.0.3 and related AMS 3.6.0h libraries, but when opening SketchUp I get this error ...
                                        Thanks

                                        Errore di caricamento del file C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main_entry.rb
                                        Error: #<IOError: The required, staged c extension file, "C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/libraries/stage/win64/2.5/msp_lib.so", is missing!>
                                        C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:204:in block in require_all' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:201:in each'
                                        C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:201:in require_all' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main.rb:70:in <top (required)>'
                                        C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/RubyStdLib/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:59:in require' C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/RubyStdLib/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:59:in require'
                                        C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main_entry.rb:15:in <top (required)>' C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/extensions.rb:197:in require'
                                        C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/extensions.rb:197:in load' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:21:in register_extension'
                                        C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:21:in <module:MSPhysics>' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:5:in <top (required)>'

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • T Offline
                                          tayyab2224
                                          last edited by 7 May 2020, 13:37

                                          @mauroa6 said:

                                          Good morning
                                          I installed MSPhysic 1.0.3 and related AMS 3.6.0h libraries, but when opening SketchUp I get this error ...
                                          Thanks

                                          Errore di caricamento del file C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main_entry.rb
                                          Error: #<IOError: The required, staged c extension file, "C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/libraries/stage/win64/2.5/msp_lib.so", is missing!>
                                          C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:204:in block in require_all' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:201:in each'
                                          C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:201:in require_all' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main.rb:70:in <top (required)>'
                                          C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/RubyStdLib/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:59:in require' C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/RubyStdLib/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:59:in require'
                                          C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main_entry.rb:15:in <top (required)>' C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/extensions.rb:197:in require'
                                          C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/extensions.rb:197:in load' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:21:in register_extension'
                                          C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:21:in <module:MSPhysics>' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:5:in <top (required)>'

                                          MsP NOT WORKS IN 2017-2020.

                                          M. Tayyab

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 41
                                          • 42
                                          • 43
                                          • 44
                                          • 45
                                          • 46
                                          • 43 / 46
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          Buy SketchPlus
                                          Buy SUbD
                                          Buy WrapR
                                          Buy eBook
                                          Buy Modelur
                                          Buy Vertex Tools
                                          Buy SketchCuisine
                                          Buy FormFonts

                                          Advertisement