• Login
sketchucation logo sketchucation
  • Login
ℹ️ GoFundMe | Our friend Gus Robatto needs some help in a challenging time Learn More

MSPhysics 1.0.3 (16 October 2017)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Plugins
920 Posts 170 Posters 882.8k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    mauroa6
    last edited by 7 May 2020, 07:09

    Good morning
    I installed MSPhysic 1.0.3 and related AMS 3.6.0h libraries, but when opening SketchUp I get this error ...
    Thanks

    Errore di caricamento del file C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main_entry.rb
    Error: #<IOError: The required, staged c extension file, "C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/libraries/stage/win64/2.5/msp_lib.so", is missing!>
    C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:204:in block in require_all' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:201:in each'
    C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:201:in require_all' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main.rb:70:in <top (required)>'
    C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/RubyStdLib/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:59:in require' C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/RubyStdLib/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:59:in require'
    C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main_entry.rb:15:in <top (required)>' C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/extensions.rb:197:in require'
    C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/extensions.rb:197:in load' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:21:in register_extension'
    C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:21:in <module:MSPhysics>' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:5:in <top (required)>'

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • T Offline
      tayyab2224
      last edited by 7 May 2020, 13:37

      @mauroa6 said:

      Good morning
      I installed MSPhysic 1.0.3 and related AMS 3.6.0h libraries, but when opening SketchUp I get this error ...
      Thanks

      Errore di caricamento del file C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main_entry.rb
      Error: #<IOError: The required, staged c extension file, "C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/libraries/stage/win64/2.5/msp_lib.so", is missing!>
      C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:204:in block in require_all' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:201:in each'
      C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/ams_Lib/extension_manager.rb:201:in require_all' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main.rb:70:in <top (required)>'
      C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/RubyStdLib/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:59:in require' C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/RubyStdLib/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:59:in require'
      C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics/main_entry.rb:15:in <top (required)>' C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/extensions.rb:197:in require'
      C:/SketchUp 2019/Tools/extensions.rb:197:in load' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:21:in register_extension'
      C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:21:in <module:MSPhysics>' C:/Users/Mauro/AppData/Roaming/SketchUp/SketchUp 2019/SketchUp/Plugins/MSPhysics.rb:5:in <top (required)>'

      MsP NOT WORKS IN 2017-2020.

      M. Tayyab

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • O Offline
        Oxer
        last edited by 7 May 2020, 13:46

        MSPhysic doesn't work in SketchUp > 2017 but in SU2017 works fine.

        "The result is the end what is important is the process" by Oxer
        [http://www.oxervision.blogspot.com/(http://www.oxervision.blogspot.com/)]

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S Offline
          skeeterkalamazoo
          last edited by 7 May 2020, 15:14

          Hello,
          I saw a way to use this to create a walkthrough exactly like I used to be able to do it in an old architect software I had. I can't get it this, or the AMS library to work, just gets a list of errors. I have SketchUp 2020 on a Windows 10 Machine, I'm guessing it is a compatibility issue with either of those. Any ideas? If it requires an update to the plugins, do you have any plans to do that?

          It will be a real bummer if I have to figure out a different way to do this. I have a lot of difficulty having animations turn out right just using the built in ability with scenes.
          Thanks,
          Skeeter

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A Offline
            Anton_S
            last edited by 7 May 2020, 17:27

            Hello, Skeeter. I mentioned this earlier, but MSPhysics is not compatible with 2019+. I am working on 2.0, from scratch. This is one of the reasons it takes too long to release. I hope to have a working version in June or July. Thanks!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • N Offline
              nisel
              last edited by 23 May 2020, 14:12

              Is it possible to create an animation like that; Disappear or appear an object after 5 seconds?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • U Offline
                utsav1110
                last edited by 6 Jun 2020, 08:46

                Can anyone help me with this simulation of multiple plastic bottles over a conveyor?
                I need to know the flow of bottles over the conveyor. Whenever i run the simulation, it crashes.
                Don't know the reason.

                Also, if possible how can i model a simple flat belt that runs instead of this chain type belt. I have attached the file which i modelled in sketchup pro 2017.


                segmented conveyor.skp

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C Offline
                  cristyan
                  last edited by 22 Jun 2020, 21:05

                  Hello ! utsav1110 here is an conveyor chain. You can use it if can help you.


                  conveyor_chain.skp

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J Offline
                    Jorgensen
                    last edited by 16 Jul 2020, 16:13

                    @anton_s said:

                    .......is one of the reasons it takes too long to release. I hope to have a working version in June or July. Thanks!

                    Hi Anton

                    Is there some newsletter - or like, we can subscript to, to be informed when you release the next version? 😄

                    Jorgensen

                    sketchup pro 2016 16.1.1449 64 bit | windows 10 pro | i7-3770k @3.5 GHz | 16gb ram | gtx 780 ti / gtx 980 ti | nvidia driver 368.39

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A Offline
                      Anton_S
                      last edited by 19 Jul 2020, 18:28

                      @jorgensen said:

                      @anton_s said:

                      .......is one of the reasons it takes too long to release. I hope to have a working version in June or July. Thanks!

                      Hi Anton

                      Is there some newsletter - or like, we can subscript to, to be informed when you release the next version? 😄

                      Jorgensen

                      Hi Jorgensen,

                      There isn't any newsletters. Looks like I am falling behind on schedule with this one. Will do my best.

                      Thanks,
                      Anton

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • pilouP Offline
                        pilou
                        last edited by 21 Jul 2020, 12:35

                        For your tests 😄
                        Put your links as you want...
                        25.jpg

                        Wanted 2 curves...

                        2curves.jpg


                        25.skp

                        Frenchy Pilou
                        Is beautiful that please without concept!
                        My Little site :)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • pilouP Offline
                          pilou
                          last edited by 21 Jul 2020, 12:37

                          As it's very easy to make this, ☀ it's a nightmare to make a simple grid with the same "Prismatic" module! 😮 (2 curvatures in the same time)

                          After tones of traying no success! I must miss something!
                          Have you some lights about that ?

                          GIF_4-5.gif


                          scorpion_v6.skp

                          Frenchy Pilou
                          Is beautiful that please without concept!
                          My Little site :)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • pilouP Offline
                            pilou
                            last edited by 25 Jul 2020, 22:06

                            Sorry bad hypothesis ! 😳

                            That can't work with these prisms!
                            There are overlapings!
                            Works for 2 perpendicular "lines" but not for a checkerboard! 😛

                            Here with a pyramid with 5° basis

                            Tronque.jpg

                            Frenchy Pilou
                            Is beautiful that please without concept!
                            My Little site :)

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • pilouP Offline
                              pilou
                              last edited by 31 Jul 2020, 07:09

                              I found my error and won half of joints! 😉
                              No so evident to find the good angles following sizes! 🤓

                              GIF_mieux.gifGIF_mieux2.gif

                              Frenchy Pilou
                              Is beautiful that please without concept!
                              My Little site :)

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • A Offline
                                azizxpx
                                last edited by 4 Sept 2020, 12:38

                                Hello Anton_S
                                We thank you very much for this effort
                                I was hoping the work would Export in mdl format
                                Is there a way for that?

                                Thanks ..

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • C Offline
                                  cristyan
                                  last edited by 14 Sept 2020, 12:01

                                  Hello ! How can i connect these sliders ( or can be a piston joint )in a way that if I move one the other will move in the opposite direction or to affect its position (without connecting them directly). Thank you!


                                  connected slider.skp

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • M Offline
                                    mkurmanalinova
                                    last edited by 28 Sept 2020, 06:22

                                    Hello, could you help me?

                                    1. I need a command, a function that allows to find out the position of the pusher at any time by using the keys, for example. At the moment the position of the pusher is bound to the sensor. The box crosses the sensor, the sensor issues a task for the movement of the puher. Also, when we touch the sensor, we display the coordinates of the pusher. The command “puts” didn’t help, it show the text, but we need the changing value.

                                    2. I need a command that is triggered by the condition: "sensor 2" = 1, "sensor 3" = 1, moreover, when the box leaves the sensor's range, "sensor 2" = 0. The pusher moves to a value of -70 when there are 2 boxes on the conveyor in the range of sensors 2 and 3.
                                      The problem is as follows: the pusher is triggered by the condition if laser2 && laser3> 0, fly = -70, written in the script of sensor 3.
                                      But when the box crosses the sensor 3, only one condition is triggered (laser3> 0), the boxes do not accumulate.
                                      Is there a function (onTouch, onUpdate, etc.) where you can write a condition via an if for two sensors?


                                    для моделирования11.skp

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • E Offline
                                      eosmontana
                                      last edited by 17 Nov 2020, 22:14

                                      Does anyone know of a work around to install on a mac in SKU2019?

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • Dave RD Offline
                                        Dave R
                                        last edited by 20 Nov 2020, 23:15

                                        @eosmontana said:

                                        Does anyone know of a work around to install on a mac in SKU2019?

                                        As per earlier posts in this thread, the extension doesn't work in versions later than 2018 so there's no point installing it for SketchUp 2019. The author is working on a new version and it'll be released as soon as it is ready.

                                        Etaoin Shrdlu

                                        %

                                        (THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE)

                                        G28 X0.0 Y0.0 Z0.0

                                        M30

                                        %

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • A Offline
                                          ak-sam
                                          last edited by 17 Feb 2021, 21:32

                                          Hello are there any updates on when this could be compatible with SU2020 & 2021?

                                          Thanks!

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 42
                                          • 43
                                          • 44
                                          • 45
                                          • 46
                                          • 44 / 46
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          Buy SketchPlus
                                          Buy SUbD
                                          Buy WrapR
                                          Buy eBook
                                          Buy Modelur
                                          Buy Vertex Tools
                                          Buy SketchCuisine
                                          Buy FormFonts

                                          Advertisement