SU upgrade to 8.0.4811 (Maintenance 1)
-
@spence said:
I don't believe I'm able to change what codec because I'm not using the Pro version.
There's absolutely no difference between the free and pro versions in this case (since version 6, they can export animation exactly the same way).
If it does not work, there must be something else. To check if it does work, set the codec to something else than Cinepack. Export something (just a couple of frames) and open the export options again. If it did not change back to Cinepack, it works.
(I still like to export as image sequence better. I generally export at a double size then I batch resize them with some better antialiasing than what SU has and make the movie of the images - more control, more options, nicer output - but double/triple as much time to accomplish)
-
@gaieus said:
I still like to export as image sequence better. I generally export at a double size then I batch resize them with some better antialiasing than what SU has and make the movie of the images - more control, more options, nicer output - but double/triple as much time to accomplish
Plus, if anything goes wrong, like a crash, with images you can just continue where you left of while for a movie export you'd have to start from the beginning.
-
Yes, exactly. And although not an excellent movie, this technique also allows me to use some special effects between the different parts like below.
Phases of an excavation
[flash=450,380:4adfvfw1]http://www.youtube.com/v/bKsEpF1Neh0?fs=1&hl=en_US[/flash:4adfvfw1] -
@honoluludesktop said:
Doesn't DivX require a DivX player? Will it work with the WinMedia Player?
for all your video playback needs - http://www.videolan.org/ small, powerful, free, plays just about anything.
-
Yes VLC Player is great, but what if you want to send a movie to a client?
Then you must use something that can be viewed on any computer. -
@pixero said:
Yes VLC Player is great, but what if you want to send a movie to a client?
Then you must use something that can be viewed on any computer.then all bets are out the window. you can't even guarentee they have the same codec's you do anyway.
at that point, your better off boiling your work down to DVD format. that can be played on more than just a computer then...
-
I'm still using 7 (free). Is there any compelling reason to go to 8 (free)?
I'm seem to vaguely recall that someone mentioned some features had been removed from 8?
Can anyone fill me in?
-
DWG/DXF import was removed from 7.0 and substituted with a plugin in the free version. AFAIK it does not work in SU 8 (free) but I am not sure.
However you can always keep your old version 7 (I have 6, and
and can even run them together at the same time. If nothing else, the shadow bug fix is worth upgrading to v.8 M1. -
Thanks Gaieus.
I didn't know about the shadow bug. What is that all about?
-
When during an animation where shadows are on, the camera is travelling into/out of the shadow, it used to flicker. Just try it out.
Now it's fixed.
-
I checked out V-ray for SU8. There is possibility to use HDRI 360 panoramas as a background and source of natural light in scene, but this is very difficult to positionning this panoramas in accordance to real sun position.My proposition is to enlarge options in styles settings and let set 360 HDRI or raster panorama as a background instead of color sky and ground.
-
[This is probably getting off-topic]
When 360 HDRIs were "invented" the idea was to stitch together actual photographs to create Panoramic images. But no provision was made in the HDRi format to specify where the sun happened to be when the image was taken, (and what time, date, and location was used for the image). It it were, then we could attempt to rotate the image (automatically) to have the sun direction match the SketchUp sun direction. But, of course, we could not change the date, time or location of the original HDRi image to match the SketchUp sun time. (Since the HDRi image has already been taken)
These backgrounds provide great illumination and reflections. But I, (after admitting to by prejudice in this matter), think that SketchUp should leave the interface and rendering of HDRi backgrounds to the add-on renderers.
HDRI rendering
Original SketchUp Model
@rhplus said:
I checked out V-ray for SU8. There is possibility to use HDRI 360 panoramas as a background and source of natural light in scene, but this is very difficult to positionning this panoramas in accordance to real sun position.My proposition is to enlarge options in styles settings and let set 360 HDRI or raster panorama as a background instead of color sky and ground.
Al Hart
IRender nXt from Render Plus -
@al hart said:
...I [...] think that SketchUp should leave the interface and rendering of HDRi backgrounds to the add-on renderers.
SU has nothing to do with 3rd party renderers and even if it had - which one then? (Why V-ray for instance?) -
@gaieus said:
@al hart said:
...I [...] think that SketchUp should leave the interface and rendering of HDRi backgrounds to the add-on renderers.
SU has nothing to do with 3rd party renderers and even if it had - which one then? (Why V-ray for instance?)But it would be cool to use environment maps in SketchUp...
-
I'd like this too -- and not just for rendering engine use but also I think it could be very powerful as part of styles... I'm thinking of starry skies or city backdrops as being very nice touches that could be put to great use in both Sketchup and Layout.
Best,
Jason. -
You can use watermarks to add foreground and background images to your model.
Won't this do what you are looking for?
We have a lot of trouble with users first starting with 360 degrees HDRI backgrounds. One problem is that the part of the background you see in the image above is about 30 degrees or 1/12 or the whole 360 degrees - so to get good resolution - say 1280 pixels for the background - you need 12 * 1280, or 15,000 pixels in your HDRI image. And a 15,360 x 15,360 pixel image (remember that the HDRI goes 360 degrees in both directions), you need a very large image, just to grab a little of it for the background.
This is necessary if you are using the image for reflections and illumination. But a lot of extra work if you are just using it for a background.
Al Hart
IRender nXt from Render Plus -
@al hart said:
Won't this do what you are looking for?
It would be good to have background that rotate with the model when you orbit the camera, instead of just the static background.
-
Of course, but it does not allow for orbiting freely to get the composition you might prefer (a major strength of 3D).
There is a difference between bit-depth and resolution -- for rendering you need high bit-depth (High Dynamic Range) which results in huge files, but for on-screen styles a simple 8-bit jpeg representation will work fine and would allow for much smaller images (file size).
I don't think anybody is pretending you would use these while modelling -- this would be a presentation/render (layout or otherwise) only feature.
Best,
Jason. -
@thomthom said:
@al hart said:
Won't this do what you are looking for?
It would be good to have background that rotate with the model when you orbit the camera, instead of just the static background.
I seem to recall that someone did some work of placing a panoramic image on the inside of a sphere which could then be placed outside of the model.
Al Hart
IRender nXt from Render Plus -
Let me explain my earlier suggestion on this examples:
I decided to make a real image showing interior of this building. This is snapshot from SU8:
My idea was not to use electric lamps, only natural sketchup default sun light and additional enviroment light together with sun.
Here are my trials:
at the end is snap from HDRI panorama.
There are many settings in V-ray and I tried all uf them, but the most important is to make ideal accordance of sun position and panorama.And another examples:
and panorama:
Every reflections are natural from sun and environment.
That's what for I want to have a real background in sketchup scene.
Advertisement