sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    [Plugin] Solid Inspector

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Plugins
    303 Posts 99 Posters 260.2k Views 98 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • thomthomT Offline
      thomthom
      last edited by

      Because while it's easy for us humans to see the correct solution, it's much harder to code a solution. One can code a solution for this specific situation - but that wouldn't apply to other situations. Generic solution for repairing geometry is difficult.

      Thomas Thomassen β€” SketchUp Monkey & Coding addict
      List of my plugins and link to the CookieWare fund

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • TIGT Offline
        TIG Moderator
        last edited by

        The way my SolidSolver deals with that particular case is that it finds faces for the unfaced and single-faced edges on that corner, it then removes the newly added inner triangular partition-face, whilst leaving the three new triangular facets on the outer shell.
        At that point it's a solid.
        It finally prompts you to remove the three coplanar edges.
        If you want the cube actually to have an angled triangular corner facet you need to edit it and delete the unfaced edges before attempting to make it a solid - then the one triangular corner facet is added if it's still missing...

        TIG

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • pilouP Offline
          pilou
          last edited by

          THX for the infos! πŸ‘

          Frenchy Pilou
          Is beautiful that please without concept!
          My Little site :)

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jgbJ Offline
            jgb
            last edited by

            While I really appreciate TT's SI2's ability to fix problems, (for me it works well about 90%++ of the time) it would be better if it could simply highlight an "unfixable" problem, now indicated as "info" and maintain that highlight when exiting the tool, so I can find it fast and fix it manually.

            Perhaps, by creating a group on its own temporary layer that traces/duplicates the unfixable errors and renders them in red lines/faces, as is done now to identify those errors. That way I can see and fix any problem outside SI2, then simply delete the highlight layer/group.

            Just a thought.....


            jgb

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • jgbJ Offline
              jgb
              last edited by

              I just noticed something; whenever I import an SU-8 model into SU-2015 and make edits to some faces (in what was a perfect solid in SU-8 or SU-15) I often end up with multiple faces off single lines that SI-2 does not see, and SU says it is no longer solid.

              It has happened in 3 models so far, and I quite often get 3 faces on a single lined perimeter. When I delete just the extraneous faces, it regains solidity.

              It does not happen when the solid originates in SU-15.

              Betchya nobody else sees this. πŸ‘Ώ


              jgb

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • N Offline
                NeloNath
                last edited by

                Your plugin saved my life, thank you πŸ˜„

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • N Offline
                  nataliablanco87
                  last edited by

                  Hi ThomThom, I've been using SI2 for a couple of weeks and is awesome. I totally loved it, but right now I'm checking on a component and it says everything is fine, but still doesn't appear to be a solid component. Dunno what else to do πŸ˜•

                  Thanks


                  Imagen2.jpg

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • thomthomT Offline
                    thomthom
                    last edited by

                    Are you able to share the model?

                    Thomas Thomassen β€” SketchUp Monkey & Coding addict
                    List of my plugins and link to the CookieWare fund

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • K Offline
                      kiwi15
                      last edited by

                      This is not a post about the (excellent) Solid Solver in particular, but it applies to it as well so that is why I am using it as an example.

                      I have problems with eye strains and feel quite uncomfortable looking at many of the low-resolution extension icons that are piling up inside my SU workspace. It looks like they are all out of focus on my Mac retina display, so I found a simple way to upgrade many of them using this simple method. See attached image.

                      I hope someone else out there find this information helpful as well.


                      Icon_resolution_upgrade_tutorial(1600).png

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • thomthomT Offline
                        thomthom
                        last edited by

                        I just updated this extension to 2.4.4 in order to add some extra debug code for a particular persistent bug I'm getting reports of - which I've been unable to reproduce.

                        Please update to the latest version in order to ensure you can submit error reports with better info back to me.

                        Also, if you run into issues, if you can, please post the model in this thread. (Try to undo whatever Solid Inspector might have tried to fix and submit the model as it where before fixing.)

                        Thomas Thomassen β€” SketchUp Monkey & Coding addict
                        List of my plugins and link to the CookieWare fund

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • tuna1957T Offline
                          tuna1957
                          last edited by

                          Have a strange issue with Solid Inspector2. Posting screenshot of an example. Modeled the cube at correct size for a casino dice. Made a component. Scaled up 1000x. Drew the "pips" in the scaled up copy, 24 sided circle. Ran Roundcorner on the edges. SU shows it as solid but if I run Solid Inspector I get "short edges" for basically every intersection. No line segment in the scaled up copy is shorter than 2.5". I see this behavior in a lot of different models.
                          Where the problem comes in I will get a "fix model" prompt when closing SU and if you let it fix the model it will destroy some of your geometry. In this models case it's at the corners of the dice. I'm sure it's something I'm doing but like I said I see this a lot in small objects that I do modifications on in a scaled up copy.

                          Edit - forgot to mention.... SU2015Pro on Mac osx 10.10.5


                          short edges.jpg

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • J Offline
                            jvcompiani Newcomers
                            last edited by Dave R

                            You're the boss! This extension solve all my problems!!!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • G Offline
                              gnusardni Newcomers
                              last edited by

                              Hello Thom and Forum.
                              Maybe it is too late, but I never succeed installing solid inspector in my SU 8 pro.
                              My laptop is the old one windows 7 64 bit with 2 GB RAM, and it was enough for my daily works.
                              The oldest version found at github is v1.2.0
                              I read somewhere that v1.1.0 could be work ?
                              an what is the TT_lib version for that.
                              But where is it, can not find that file.
                              Please help
                              Many Thanks !

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • 1
                              • 2
                              • 7
                              • 8
                              • 9
                              • 10
                              • 11
                              • 15
                              • 16
                              • 9 / 16
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              Buy SketchPlus
                              Buy SUbD
                              Buy WrapR
                              Buy eBook
                              Buy Modelur
                              Buy Vertex Tools
                              Buy SketchCuisine
                              Buy FormFonts

                              Advertisement