• Login
sketchucation logo sketchucation
  • Login
πŸ€‘ 30% Off | Artisan 2 on sale until April 30th Buy Now

[Plugin] Solid Inspector

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Plugins
302 Posts 98 Posters 260.0k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    Dave R
    last edited by 26 May 2015, 15:01

    It showed up white when I opened the SKP file and appeared to flicker as I orbited indicating z-fighting. It wasn't difficult at all to locate.

    Etaoin Shrdlu

    %

    (THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE)

    G28 X0.0 Y0.0 Z0.0

    M30

    %

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • B Offline
      Box
      last edited by 26 May 2015, 15:04

      Use Tab to cycle through.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • T Offline
        thomthom
        last edited by 26 May 2015, 15:31

        SketchUp perform a very naive manifold test - if all edges have exactly 2 faces connected.
        However - there are edge cases where this fails, like with this model:
        2015-05-26_17h35_43.png

        Solid Inspector use a different method to detect solids. However, in this case with the overlapping face (which shouldn't happen) it fails to detect this anomaly.

        Thomas Thomassen β€” SketchUp Monkey & Coding addict
        List of my plugins and link to the CookieWare fund

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J Offline
          jgb
          last edited by 26 May 2015, 19:43

          Now that I knew where to look, I copied the comp to 1 side and saw the white face.
          Gone in 5 seconds and fixed! Thanks again Dave. πŸ‘ πŸ‘

          In its original location those gear teeth in that area were visually covered by another gear (comp) so I could not see it. It was also the same area that SI2 found numerous non-fixable errors, and in my manual search and cleanup, missed that one. I never looked at the isolated comp I sent to this thread.

          ThomThom: Is this sort of error findable or fixable in SI2?
          I don't recall having this sort of error undetected in earlier SU-8 versions of SI.


          jgb

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • T Offline
            thomthom
            last edited by 26 May 2015, 20:10

            I ran it in CleanUp - which actually does look for these kind of things (but off by default because it's a very slow thing to do) but even that seemed to fail to detect it.
            Not sure what's going on with that model...

            Thomas Thomassen β€” SketchUp Monkey & Coding addict
            List of my plugins and link to the CookieWare fund

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J Offline
              jgb
              last edited by 13 Jun 2015, 21:36

              Another "shiny" but flawed non-solid. Multiple errors not detected; open faces, multiple faces (the bottom has 3 faces).

              I was adding corner cubes and did an interim solid check

              There were other errors it fixed, but somehow not these.

              SI2 reports "shiny" but it is not.


              jgb

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • T Offline
                thomthom
                last edited by 13 Jun 2015, 22:13

                hm.. yea - another model where some faces have overlapping faces and invalid edge loops. Skrews up the algorithm. Have to look into catching that. Do a validity check before the manifold check.

                Thomas Thomassen β€” SketchUp Monkey & Coding addict
                List of my plugins and link to the CookieWare fund

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • J Offline
                  jgb
                  last edited by 13 Jun 2015, 22:55

                  I found it impossible to fix. The bottom face was 3 faces bounded by a single line rectangle. I could not delete a face, it kept coming back if I tried to fix something on an adjoining face. Then when I thought it was almost OK, I did another SI which found many problems. So I said let SI fix it. Ended up with about 8 valid lines and faces. SI "fixed" it by blowing most of it away.
                  I blew the rest away, started fresh, and that turned out OK.

                  So, anybody, I don't need it fixed. I posted it for ThomThom to ferret out the why.


                  jgb

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T Offline
                    thomthom
                    last edited by 15 Jun 2015, 10:28

                    @jgb said:

                    I could not delete a face, it kept coming back if I tried to fix something on an adjoining face.

                    Ackh! One of them models - where faces start appearing all over the place. I've never found a good solution for that. I saw a good number of them in my previous job - usually ended up recreating the geometry because it was quicker. Never really figured out the cause - but I suspect it was often due to some precision issues which can often creep in from imported geometry.

                    Thomas Thomassen β€” SketchUp Monkey & Coding addict
                    List of my plugins and link to the CookieWare fund

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • P Offline
                      pilou
                      last edited by 15 Jun 2015, 10:31

                      Why this must be made by Hand ? (Close the solid) it detects 2 possibilities?

                      inspector.gif

                      Frenchy Pilou
                      Is beautiful that please without concept!
                      My Little site :)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • T Offline
                        thomthom
                        last edited by 15 Jun 2015, 10:37

                        Because while it's easy for us humans to see the correct solution, it's much harder to code a solution. One can code a solution for this specific situation - but that wouldn't apply to other situations. Generic solution for repairing geometry is difficult.

                        Thomas Thomassen β€” SketchUp Monkey & Coding addict
                        List of my plugins and link to the CookieWare fund

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • TIGT Offline
                          TIG Moderator
                          last edited by 15 Jun 2015, 11:03

                          The way my SolidSolver deals with that particular case is that it finds faces for the unfaced and single-faced edges on that corner, it then removes the newly added inner triangular partition-face, whilst leaving the three new triangular facets on the outer shell.
                          At that point it's a solid.
                          It finally prompts you to remove the three coplanar edges.
                          If you want the cube actually to have an angled triangular corner facet you need to edit it and delete the unfaced edges before attempting to make it a solid - then the one triangular corner facet is added if it's still missing...

                          TIG

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • P Offline
                            pilou
                            last edited by 15 Jun 2015, 11:59

                            THX for the infos! πŸ‘

                            Frenchy Pilou
                            Is beautiful that please without concept!
                            My Little site :)

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • J Offline
                              jgb
                              last edited by 15 Jun 2015, 18:55

                              While I really appreciate TT's SI2's ability to fix problems, (for me it works well about 90%++ of the time) it would be better if it could simply highlight an "unfixable" problem, now indicated as "info" and maintain that highlight when exiting the tool, so I can find it fast and fix it manually.

                              Perhaps, by creating a group on its own temporary layer that traces/duplicates the unfixable errors and renders them in red lines/faces, as is done now to identify those errors. That way I can see and fix any problem outside SI2, then simply delete the highlight layer/group.

                              Just a thought.....


                              jgb

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • J Offline
                                jgb
                                last edited by 17 Jun 2015, 20:07

                                I just noticed something; whenever I import an SU-8 model into SU-2015 and make edits to some faces (in what was a perfect solid in SU-8 or SU-15) I often end up with multiple faces off single lines that SI-2 does not see, and SU says it is no longer solid.

                                It has happened in 3 models so far, and I quite often get 3 faces on a single lined perimeter. When I delete just the extraneous faces, it regains solidity.

                                It does not happen when the solid originates in SU-15.

                                Betchya nobody else sees this. πŸ‘Ώ


                                jgb

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • N Offline
                                  NeloNath
                                  last edited by 28 Jul 2015, 21:42

                                  Your plugin saved my life, thank you πŸ˜„

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • N Offline
                                    nataliablanco87
                                    last edited by 27 Oct 2015, 15:11

                                    Hi ThomThom, I've been using SI2 for a couple of weeks and is awesome. I totally loved it, but right now I'm checking on a component and it says everything is fine, but still doesn't appear to be a solid component. Dunno what else to do πŸ˜•

                                    Thanks


                                    Imagen2.jpg

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • T Offline
                                      thomthom
                                      last edited by 15 Dec 2015, 16:08

                                      Are you able to share the model?

                                      Thomas Thomassen β€” SketchUp Monkey & Coding addict
                                      List of my plugins and link to the CookieWare fund

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • K Offline
                                        kiwi15
                                        last edited by 26 May 2016, 12:40

                                        This is not a post about the (excellent) Solid Solver in particular, but it applies to it as well so that is why I am using it as an example.

                                        I have problems with eye strains and feel quite uncomfortable looking at many of the low-resolution extension icons that are piling up inside my SU workspace. It looks like they are all out of focus on my Mac retina display, so I found a simple way to upgrade many of them using this simple method. See attached image.

                                        I hope someone else out there find this information helpful as well.


                                        Icon_resolution_upgrade_tutorial(1600).png

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • T Offline
                                          thomthom
                                          last edited by 27 Jul 2016, 20:35

                                          I just updated this extension to 2.4.4 in order to add some extra debug code for a particular persistent bug I'm getting reports of - which I've been unable to reproduce.

                                          Please update to the latest version in order to ensure you can submit error reports with better info back to me.

                                          Also, if you run into issues, if you can, please post the model in this thread. (Try to undo whatever Solid Inspector might have tried to fix and submit the model as it where before fixing.)

                                          Thomas Thomassen β€” SketchUp Monkey & Coding addict
                                          List of my plugins and link to the CookieWare fund

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 12
                                          • 13
                                          • 14
                                          • 15
                                          • 16
                                          • 15 / 16
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          Buy SketchPlus
                                          Buy SUbD
                                          Buy WrapR
                                          Buy eBook
                                          Buy Modelur
                                          Buy Vertex Tools
                                          Buy SketchCuisine
                                          Buy FormFonts

                                          Advertisement