[Plugin] Simple Glazing tool
-
Welcome to the SCF tomot and thanks for the contribution. Any further info / pics on this?
-
I see no ruby gurus willing to take a nibble yet?
Once the rectangle has been picked, its co-ordinates are defined
by $pt0 thru $pt3 (see below)#------create a new set of points from the original 3 point pick
$pt0=Geom::Point3d.new($pts[0][0], $pts[0][1], $pts[0][2])
$pt1=Geom::Point3d.new($pts[1][0], $pts[1][1], $pts[1][2])
$pt2=Geom::Point3d.new($pts[2][0], $pts[2][1], $pts[2][2])
$pt3=Geom::Point3d.new($pts[3][0], $pts[3][1], $pts[3][2])I can then create the required code that makes the glazing,
give it a transparent color, followed by "pushpull'ing" the thickness of the glass
whose value is $ggthick (see below)#------create the Glazing
group=entities.add_group
entities=group.entities
base=entities.add_face($pt0, $pt1, $pt2, $pt3)
base.material=Sketchup::Color.new(163,204,204) #change the RGB Color numbers here
base.material.alpha = 0.6
base.pushpull $ggthickAll of the above will produce glazing in any plane xy, xz, yz.
However in order to set the glazing back from an xy plane, I need a z offset
equally for glazing on an xz plane needs a y offset, and for glazing on an yz plane
requires an x offset.If I was producing a static glazing ruby where the glazing was always located at 0,0,0
then I could provide the offset option via $wwthick which is the "Glass Setback from face value.
as follows:$pt3=Geom::Point3d.new($pts[3][0], $pts[3][1], $pts[3][2]-$wwthick)
but this will not work for the other 2 planes.Is there a 3d point in Ruby that is not tied to the world co-ordinate system, but rather
to a local co-ordinate system?or is there a way to do a double pushpull one for the offset and one for the glazing thickness,
and then erasing the first sheet of glass?TIA!
-
@unknownuser said:
Is there a 3d point in Ruby that is not tied to the world co-ordinate system, but rather
to a local co-ordinate system?Entities added to a group are relative to the Group's origin and axes.
-
Jim I don't know what I'm going to do with that piece of information
in a practical way to solve this problem.As the attached pic shows, at present the glazing is flush with each face
of the 2 opening the glazing is installed into.
I would like to have the option of letting the user pick an offset back from
the face as is shown in the opening on the left side of the cube.
-
Well, you know the normal of the glass, just move the group forward or backward along the normal.
In other words, apply a transformation to the final group in the + or - direction along the base face normal.
-
Aren't you re-inventing Windowizer without a frame ? Currently you must enter something, but 0.1mm makes the frames effectively nothing...
-
tomot
Very clever tool and thanks.
As it creates a group it is very easy to move back and forth.
Good enough as it stands.dtr
-
@tig said:
Aren't you re-inventing Windowizer without a frame ? Currently you must enter something, but 0.1mm makes the frames effectively nothing...
Not at all! Windowizer asks for 4 sided face to be selected first. While I use the "pick 3 point rectangle" method.
This is not a criticism of how Windowizer works, it has more to do with my workflow.
I design structures in SU using walls and slabs that have thickness. Then I punch openings in them for windows, doors, stairs etc., later I fill in those openings with the required components.I find the "pick 3 points rectangle' method the most natural way to fill in an opening. If I were to use Windowizer, I have to fill in the opening prior to running the script.
However, I would be more interested in getting the setback problem solved.
While Jim's comments make a lot of sense, I can't get the code to work.aargh!
-
@dtrarch said:
tomot
Very clever tool and thanks.
As it creates a group it is very easy to move back and forth.
Good enough as it stands.dtr
Thanks! But after I have moved about 30 windows back 3" from the face. I
feel like my Grey matter is leaving for greener pastures. -
Hi tomot,
Here is a snippet of your plugin with the transformation.
base.pushpull $ggthick self.reset normal = base.normal normal.length = 2 # how far? tr = Geom;;Transformation.translation(normal.reverse) group.transform! tr model.commit_operation end -
Jim, please accept my great appreciation, with a reply HUG!
so here is the the attached update:
-
clever and useful indeed.. thanks
-
I asked a long time ago for windowizer to have ability to have "0" as the frame, and have it be left out completely... but all I remember getting was a "good idea Fletch"... while never seeing it implemented... I'm still waiting.
until then... this could be useful - thanks for sharing!... and true about the workflow... sometime nice to just draw interactively.
-
@fletch: Yeah, unfortunately, that happens a lot more than I would like. More ideas than time to implement...
-
Tomat, thanks very much for the tool.
RickW, Windowizer is one of the most useful tools available. However, could it be adapted to provide an inner frame of a window? I currently push pull through the wall, repair the faces & then use windowizer on both sides of the wall. -
@jga said:
However, could it be adapted to provide an inner frame of a window?
Yes I have a working copy, with glazing, frame and exterior trim however, I still have
a few bugs to resolve, before posting it. -
@Rick,
ah well... c'est la vie... -
Advertisement