@rich o brien said: @unknownuser said: [attachment=0:2v5934dq]<!-- ia0 -->icono.jpg<!-- ia0 -->[/attachment:2v5934dq] These 3 one are nor readable : we must think and move the mouse on them for know what they do ! And in general too agressive! And pudgy plump! The Bluegrey one for Edit, Delete, Report... and under avatars are so chic! Give me time Pilou. I have other surprises in the oven More surprises in the oven, Rich come on, you can't just say that and keep us guessing

Another article [image: 362160_web_WrightHome.jpg]

Nice video and concept. I guess.....Sketchup+Lumion... Maybe. Regards

Thanks Dan

@roger said: How many of us are looking at our mates and saying "really?" ...or just looking in the mirror in the morning in my case!

Wow, that's truly useful, thanks for the link.

very nice,sounds like Colin Farrell from "In Bruges"

Try changing your user name?

@unknownuser said: Once you get used to it you do not want to be without it. Same goes for OSX. But, you can cleanup and reorganize manually your startup menu, it's more appropriate for the windows UI.

@roger said: @thomthom said: Thieving bastards kicked my bike! Now I'm a pedestrian. May all their plugins be posted to the wrong directory.

Ditto from down here, Thom.... Hope you enjoyed your cookie...

@dale said: I am driven to become self sustaining. There is a lot in this statement Dale! Much of Western society have no idea about this. I still have fond memories when a child of my Grandmother carefully folding the brown paper from a parcel and rolling the string into a ball. It made sense! I always knew where to locate some brown paper or string. I am a subscriber the Mother Earth News and have been since I was a young lad looking forward to the annual BIG BOOK! Nowadays it digital, but that fine too. I would love for SketchUcation to have closer ties with Mother Earth News as I feel SketchUp would be a great tool for showing many of their green projects. [image: tiny-homes.jpg] Cozy, Affordable Tiny Homes Maybe I'll shoot them an email

is there anyone here , that is doing watercolors? anyone interested in a co-exhibition, here in Isfahan?

got my airline tickets in there, i think, i hope, for an upcoming flight. now, will my little airport be able to scan them? or will i only be able to use them coming back from a big metro area... hmm.

Wow. Pity about those flats. Looks dangerous.

@Pilou Etude-Blender.fr opens well for me too right now ! Nice a good companion in the learning process/ I'm going to learn "plein de bonnes choses", merci Pilou. **S

This is a great story, 3D printing has come on massively. The materials are really diverse now, can even print in stainless steel, bronze, brass, titanium, gold.... http://i.materialise.com/materials

@michaliszissiou said: @unknownuser said: I think we all use our snakes as pendulums Hey, you are too young for this.

Wait and see. There'll be an extended period of downtime this weekend.

Theoretically there's nothing 'wrong' with traveling faster than the speed of light. Just as in the same way there's no problems for us traveling slower than the speed of light. It's just there's a catch - at the speed of light you need infinite energy, have infinite mass, time stops etc... and if you are just 'near' the speed of light [either side] the effects are also quite problematical for your day-to-day life. This means that objects traveling very very fast on our side of the light-barrier can't readily accelerate without dire consequences, and in the same way objects traveling above the speed of light can't readily decelerate down towards the speed of light either. So ne'r the twain shall meet! We are talking about transporting information, as much as physical objects here... The 'alternative' idea of 'warping' space itself... so that an object has less of a distance to traverse in the same time-frame could have the same effect as traveling faster than the speed of light... but controlling the forces involved in doing this 'wormhole' [or similar] in a way that doesn't squish the traveling object so much that its information is lost, have not been worked out at all well! Since 'you' are going to be the most important bits of information in the object that is traveling this way, then your chances of 'you' still being 'you' at the other end are, at the moment, very slim... Also, let's say you did successfully go one way down this 'tube', then how would you return ? Any given 'wormhole' is probably going to be transitory and difficult to fine-tune in where/when it ends up at all, let alone doing it in the exact 'reverse' way - so you might easily arrive back before you left or return long after you departed, either way this would not a satisfactory result... Unfortunately 'Star Trek' et al is/was made with little basis in reality... Although I really do hope that someone somewhere manages to sort out this seemingly insoluble issue... I won't be one of the first volunteers...