@tomsdesk said:

Here's another excellent reason to vote for Obama:

Page not found |

(www.johnmccain.com)

They just keep sinking lower and lower.

I think that's a pretty good ad.

I understand your confusion, Tom. The lack of reaction I referred to was from this board. Not surprising, though.

The mainstream liberal press has focused more on Palin's clothing budget that Biden's dangerous and irresponsible statements. They have the nads to call into question Palin's "experience" while completely ignoring that Obama is nothing more than an empty suit with oratory skills. Period. I am sick and tired of the press. They are a dangerous lot.

You can't be as steamed as I am.

Pete, faith is not belief without knowledge, it is belief without proof. Subtle but critical distinction.

Eric, the system is rigged against third parties. Bastards. We need a revolution.

Sooooo, no reaction to Biden's crazy statement,huh? And some of you think the press isn't liberal?? My God!!! It's sickening. I may actually change my vote to McCain just to spite the network nitwits.

Pete, do you really think McCain's campaign had ANYTHING to do with this nutty lady's story? It's as likely that Obama's campaign did this.

@gaieus said:

These are just interiors...

(Clicking on the image takes you to a Picasa album)

"Voting for another round"

Ah ha...I see your avatar is a picture of you in this bar.

Edit: You guys in Europe have such great looking bars. The buildings are wonderful and cozy. I'm jealous.

@unknownuser said:

Fredo,

Can you please include inference locking to the Vector Push/Pull mode? Holding Shift to lock inference doesn't seem to work for me.

Also, why is the toolbar labeled NUL Transformation? Perhaps Joint Push Pull is better. After all, that is the name of the plug-in and its current name may be a bit confusing when new users look for it in their toolbars menu.

As always thanks!

This never occurred to me, Coen. Thanks, I've changed my toolbar label.

This is too much: http://www.break.com/index/unbelievable-mccain-vs-obama-dance-off.html

You're really in love with this guy, aren't you Pete? Do you have his picture in your wallet? Or posters in your office?

As someone mentioned earlier, the ruby coders have done such a marvelous job with after market improvements, who needs SU7. Well, maybe for multi-core processors.

@daniel said:

I agree it's a shame there were only two, but last I counted there were about eight people running for the office of the President (most of whom I never even heard of), and including them all would have been too much. The networks do not determine who is included in the debates, but rather the Commission on Presidential Debates. Amongst their criteria, a candidate must have support from 15% of the national electorate, as indicated by five national polling organizations, such as Ross Perot had in '92.

Appreciate the information. I think the percentage should be reduced to 5-10%; 15% is quite a lot and a tough barrier to overcome.

BYW, Tom's link is a video and not very long; maybe you've already seen it. I wish I'd seen Bob Barr on TV; he doesn't make many appearances. I've heard him speak about McCain before. It's a real shame there were NO third party candidates in the debates. I think if enough people vote third party (Libertarian, in my case) we could pressure the networks into including them.

The only change we'll get with Obama is a more liberal/socialist government. The only change we'll get with McCain is....well.... no change. Neither one is acceptable to me.

@tomsdesk said:

Pete, I think he's talking about the links I posted.

Yes, I am. Thanks.

@solo said:

I did a Google news search and only one report from Faux news appeared, guess it's just not news worthy to the other networks, so it's a non-issue.

Y'all are grasping at desperate straws now ...tsk, tsk.

Classic.

@tomsdesk said:

This is a hoot! (At least some will think so :`)

http://www.collegehumor.com/video;1831461

Here's my response in Tomspeak:

Really?? You haven't heard what Biden said? This story is fairly current....today.

@solo said:

I am not cocky at all, in fact I'm concerned of such a scenario, as posted above ....

"Don't underestimate the capacity of Democrats to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory,"

I know...2000 and 2004 must have been a bummer. I was surprised Bush won in 2004, I really was. If Obama loses, I see steady work for morticians.

@solo said:

Proud? what's to be proud of?, he ain't my daddy...

Sorry, I wasn't clear. Are you proud of Biden's latest gaffe regarding the "testing" of Obama? This is Biden at his embarrassingly best. His ego won't let him stay in the background and this could prove fatal. We'll see.

Ken Adelman...don't know him. Be careful, don't get too cocky here, there's plenty of time left for either one of them to hang themselves.

Do not underestimate the Bill Ayers anchor on Obama.

@solo said:

Now Obama’s got Colin Powell AND Google?

http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/2008/10/21/now-obamas-got-colin-powell-and-google/

Barack Hussein Obama has always had Google. No surprise here.

Tell me you're proud of Biden. Come on, be honest about this, please. You too, Tom.

@tomsdesk said:

What the "mavericks" are doing with this seems to be case in point:

http://video.google.com/videosearch?num=100&hl=en&q=%2B%22joe%20biden%22%20%2B%22international%20crisis%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wv#

ERROR: The request could not be satisfied

(blogs.abcnews.com)

Also please note he said "if Obama is in the Whitehouse" not "only if Obama is in the Whitehouse" (how they twist the true into the false and then actually say it out loud is just crazy)...either candidate will most likely be tested in this manner: nearly all since Kennedy have been also. (At least Obama won't have be dealing with a "crisis" from a republican Congress as well :`)

Good boy, Tom.