[Plugin] TIG-Smart_offset
-
here are these results.. (since you took the time to write them.. i better take the time to report )
@tig said:
Copy/paste+<enter> these into the Ruby Console and report the results:
with nothing preselected
TIG::Smart_offsetter.suitable?()
falsewith one edge preselected
TIG::Smart_offsetter.suitable?()
falsewith one face preselected
TIG::Smart_offsetter.suitable?()
truewith lots of things [including some edges] preselected
TIG::Smart_offsetter.suitable?()
true (drew two squares and selected all)with one edge preselected
TIG::Smart_offsetter.dialog()
warning- PreSelect Face[s !]
ruby - nilwith one face preselected
TIG::Smart_offsetter.dialog()
(works as expected) -
uh.. not sure what the deal is but..
upon entering all of that stuff in the console, the toolbar is now working
[edit] but then.. i quit sketchup then relaunched and the toolbar is greyed out again regardless of selection.. the menu item is working though
-
voodoo. definitely voodoo at work here.
-
@chris fullmer said:
voodoo. definitely voodoo at work here.
ha.. that darn voodoo!
some more info:
so here's what the deal with the toolbar is.. (in this example, i have 3 squares with faces drawn)
•cmmdA (select all)
•toolbar remains greyed out (menu item is live)
•do something else (rotate, pan, etc)
•toolbar becomes active
•deselect all
•toolbar remains active (menu item greys out)
•do something else (switch tool, orbit, etc)
•toolbar greys outso it appears, on mac, that something has to happen other than simply selecting in order to jump start the toolbar into updating it's state
-
Hey Tig,
I am getting the same thing Jeff has. But since Jeff actually knows what he is doing, he can do the ruby troubleshooting. Will stay tuned to see what you fellas figure out.
It works great on my windows machine at home.
Thanks TigUpdate
Jeff says his works. It does not work on my mac.
with nothing preselected TIG::Smart_offsetter.suitable?()TIG::Smart_offsetter.suitable?()
falsewith one edge preselected TIG::Smart_offsetter.suitable?()
TIG::Smart_offsetter.suitable?()
falsewith one face preselected TIG::Smart_offsetter.suitable?()
TIG::Smart_offsetter.suitable?()
truewith lots of things [including some edges] preselected TIG::Smart_offsetter.suitable?()
TIG::Smart_offsetter.suitable?()
truewith one edge preselected TIG::Smart_offsetter.dialog()
TIG.Smart_offset:PreSelect Face[s] !
with one face preselected TIG::Smart_offsetter.dialog()
Offset [+/-ve=out/My drop down "Tools" Menu works with a face preselected. The toolbar does not.
Nothing works with just edges selected.
If you need me to check anything else, and I do not get right back to ya, I am not ignoring you I am just here there and everywhere today. -
Here's v1.3 http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=446462#p446462
Removed 'suitable?' method, to suit MACs, more error traps etc.
Try this and report back... -
It works the same for me. With a face selected the drop down tools menu item will work but the single icon toolbar will not.
-
@ccbiggs said:
It works the same for me. With a face selected the drop down tools menu item will work but the single icon toolbar will not.
Which is weird... because they BOTH use 'cmd' and share the same enabled/grayed code...
To check that the toolbar WILL work somehow... can you please edit the file 'TIG-Smart_offset.rb' on your MAC with a plain text editor [BBedit???] and find the three lines starting at #117 reading:cmd.set_validation_proc{ Sketchup.active_model.selection.grep(Sketchup;;Face)[0] ? MF_ENABLED ; MF_GRAYED }
and change them to read
#cmd.set_validation_proc{ #Sketchup.active_model.selection.grep(Sketchup;;Face)[0] ? MF_ENABLED ; MF_GRAYED #}
i.e. add a # in front of each of the three lines to disable them.
Now the tool's command should always be 'enabled' in the menu & the toolbar button, if you try to use it without a Face in the Selection you'll get an error messagebox...
Let me know how this goes...Incidentally, BEFORE [& after] you make the changes... do you get the tool's context-menu item IF there's a Face in the Selection ?
-
@tig said:
To check that the toolbar WILL work somehow... can you please edit the file 'TIG-Smart_offset.rb' on your MAC with a plain text editor [BBedit???] and find the three lines starting at #117 reading:
cmd.set_validation_proc{ > Sketchup.active_model.selection.grep(Sketchup;;Face)[0] ? MF_ENABLED ; MF_GRAYED > }
and change them to read
#cmd.set_validation_proc{ > #Sketchup.active_model.selection.grep(Sketchup;;Face)[0] ? MF_ENABLED ; MF_GRAYED > #}
i.e. add a # in front of each of the three lines to disable them.
that does the trick.. the toolbar is always active now and i'll just receive an error if i try to run the tool without an appropriate selection..
[context menu works also.. but it worked prior to disabling the above lines]
-
OK !
The current tool [v1.3] works just fine for PCs... but it baulks on a MAC with some of the enable/grayed code for the toolbar button - which is weird...The editing of the three lines of code in the script to disable them with a leading #... as indicated in the preceding posts... will fix it for MAC users...
I'll see if I can get a version working properly for PC and MAC without this cludge !
In the meantime, please report any issues...
Merry Xmas
Apocalypse averted!
Phew! -
Thank you for this one really "smart" dear TIG +++
We were used to the quirks of the native offset tool as a fatality. It is a surprise to realize that it was not the caseMerry Christmas to you too
Simon
-
@tig said:
I'll see if I can get a version working properly for PC and MAC without this cludge !
I posted this on the first page and it will work on both?
set validation doesn't seem to work on macs on Toolbarscmd2=UI;;Command.new('TIG.Smart_offset'){self.dialog()} cmd2.small_icon=File.join(dir, 'TIG-Smart_offset.png') cmd2.large_icon=File.join(dir, 'TIG-Smart_offset.png') toolbar=UI;;Toolbar.new('TIG.Smart_offset') toolbar.add_item(cmd2)
john
-
Here's v1.4 http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=446462#p446462
It now only applies toolbar enabled/grayed [validation] on PCs; on a MAC the toolbar button is always enabled, but when you attempt to use it without a suitable preselection there's an error-messagebox...
This now means PC and MAC users should have a quite similar usage -
Thanks for this advanced tool ! Nice to solve round edge offset.
But I have a two requests :
First, (crossing post with Pilou ) I think when the offset cross itself, there is a chance it make a hole. Your Smart Offset fill all the shape. It will be cool if your toll can solve this case.
The second is a bonus setting to create a round offset like this :
I don't know if it's "easy" to make this kind of function, perhaps crossing your offset tool and your Chamfer tool from 2D Tools. -
From Daredevil
Original
Smart_Offest
Normal result wished -
DareDevil/Pilou
I had been following your discussions about this in the French forum...
I know what you are asking for, but it is very complicated to come up with an algorithm to remove the 'hole' - it's easy for us to 'see' what's to go and what's to stay, but in code it is very complicated to ensure that the unwanted parts are removed.
If anyone has any ideas [even seemingly silly ones?] I am open to suggestions...On the 'rounded corner' matter... This effectively a 'multi-fillet' tool.
The main issue I see in you'd need to select just the edges to fillet and not a face, otherwise in the case you illustrated the already curved part would potentially get 'multi-filleted'...That's x6 clicks to select the ones needed with a new tool - or x2 to select face & its-edges, then x2+Ctrl+Shift to remove the face and the unwanted arc [or +x1 click to make a fence, e.g. for an 'arc' made from exploded edges...] - say x4 or x5...
OR using the existing 2dFillet tool x2 per vertex = x10 clicks.
But are your few extra clicks worth my lost brain-cells needed to contrive this wonder ? -
For the multi fillet
Surely not but don't forget the pleasure to find the solution! -
WOW!!! This is really helpful! Great! Thank you very much!!!
And Merry Christmas to you too! -
"Smart TIG" offsets indeed!
-
@unknownuser said:
For the multi fillet
Surely not but don't forget the pleasure to find the solution!that pleasure would be nothing compared to the pleasure experienced by figuring this one out
Advertisement