sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • 登入
    Oops, your profile's looking a bit empty! To help us tailor your experience, please fill in key details like your SketchUp version, skill level, operating system, and more. Update and save your info on your profile page today!
    🔌 Smart Spline | Fluid way to handle splines for furniture design and complex structures. Download

    [Plugin] FredoTools - v4.5c - 24 Jun 24

    已排程 已置頂 已鎖定 已移動 Plugins
    463 貼文 123 Posters 710.9k 瀏覽 121 Watching
    正在載入更多貼文
    • 從舊到新
    • 從新到舊
    • 最多點贊
    回覆
    • 在新貼文中回覆
    登入後回覆
    此主題已被刪除。只有擁有主題管理權限的使用者可以查看。
    • fredo6F 離線
      fredo6
      最後由 編輯

      This is due to SU2017, which is messing up dimensions in web dialogs.

      Can you tell me if you can resize the dialog box?

      Fred

      1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
      • B 離線
        bharralure
        最後由 編輯

        Non, la boîte de dialogue n'est pas redimensionnable.

        1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
        • fredo6F 離線
          fredo6
          最後由 編輯

          NEW RELEASE: FredoTools v3.0c - 13 Feb 17

          FredoTools 3.0c fixes sizing issues for some dialog boxes in SU2017

          See main post of this thread for Download.

          Fredo

          1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
          • V 離線
            vlad_s
            最後由 編輯

            Good day, does not work markvertex with fredolib 7.3 and 7.5 in windows xp. In fredolib 6.4 worked.
            Sorry for the English language, computer translation from Russian.


            fredo73a_1.jpg

            1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
            • C 離線
              cadmunkey
              最後由 編輯

              Hi Fredo, any reason the Sold Volume calculator would report a solid back as a minus figure?
              I took volume calc from my marble model and thought something was strange with the result. So checked individual pieces and some are reporting a minus figure, which of course deducts itself from the final overall result.

              1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
              • Dave RD 離線
                Dave R
                最後由 編輯

                Cadmunkey, is it possible the faces are reversed on the volume?

                Etaoin Shrdlu

                %

                (THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE)

                G28 X0.0 Y0.0 Z0.0

                M30

                %

                1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                • C 離線
                  cadmunkey
                  最後由 編輯

                  @dave r said:

                  Cadmunkey, is it possible the faces are reversed on the volume?

                  Hi Dave, no I did check for this. I cant see a reason for it at all.

                  1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                  • Dave RD 離線
                    Dave R
                    最後由 編輯

                    How about copying and pasting that volume into a new file and sharing it so we can see it?

                    Etaoin Shrdlu

                    %

                    (THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE)

                    G28 X0.0 Y0.0 Z0.0

                    M30

                    %

                    1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                    • C 離線
                      cadmunkey
                      最後由 編輯

                      @dave r said:

                      How about copying and pasting that volume into a new file and sharing it so we can see it?

                      Dave, happy to send it to you privately for a look? its a 12mb file.

                      1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                      • fredo6F 離線
                        fredo6
                        最後由 編輯

                        @cadmunkey
                        You are right. Actually, the result is correct mathematically. In the algorithm, negative volumes are normally used for holes in solids. But intuitively, we are not used to negative volumes.

                        So, I fixed it, and it will go in the next release.

                        Fredo

                        1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                        • C 離線
                          cadmunkey
                          最後由 編輯

                          @fredo6 said:

                          @cadmunkey
                          You are right. Actually, the result is correct mathematically. In the algorithm, negative volumes are normally used for holes in solids. But intuitively, we are not used to negative volumes.

                          So, I fixed it, and it will go in the next release.

                          Fredo

                          These are not holes in solids, if you want I can email you my model for analysis.
                          Its a marble stone cut list, and some of the stones are reporting back as negative volumes.

                          1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                          • fredo6F 離線
                            fredo6
                            最後由 編輯

                            I mean that when you flip along a group or component instances, you actually transform their axes and mathematically, this gives a negative volume, as it does for holes in the solid.

                            Anyway, many thanks for signalling the problem.

                            Fredo

                            1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                            • R 離線
                              rv1974
                              最後由 編輯

                              I wish Curvishear could be become way more usable by
                              letting user 'in-vivo' move a vertex (and thus setting desired height and slope direction)


                              Capture.JPG

                              1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                              • B 離線
                                bharralure
                                最後由 編輯

                                Bonjour Dave
                                Je confirme que "Volume Solides" affiche une valeur négative pour toute instance crée en miroir.
                                Ce problème n'est pas spécifique à SU 2017, l'ayant déjà constaté sous SU 2016 et SU 2015.
                                Je joint un Gif crée sous SU 2017.
                                FredoTools_VolumeSolides.gif

                                1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                • fredo6F 離線
                                  fredo6
                                  最後由 編輯

                                  NEW RELEASE: FredoTools v3.1a - 09 Jul 17

                                  Requirement: LibFredo6 v7.7a

                                  FredoTools 3.1a introduces a new plugin, called DivideEdges. It also supports hi-resolution screens and fixes some bugs.

                                  See FredoTools home page for Download.

                                  Fredo

                                  1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                  • JClementsJ 離線
                                    JClements
                                    最後由 編輯

                                    Divide Edges (DE) is a nice new addition to your toolset. Thank you!

                                    Perhaps a version of DE could be adapted to produce dashed lines? When selected only an ODD number of segments would be available, then every-other-segment after the first segment would be deleted or hidden (not sure which would be the best to go). Maybe it could be "parametric" in the sense that the user could restore the original at later time and apply and different number of segments.

                                    John | Illustrator | Beaverton, Oregon

                                    1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                    • fredo6F 離線
                                      fredo6
                                      最後由 編輯

                                      NEW RELEASE: FredoTools v3.1b - 11 Jul 17

                                      FredoTools 3.1b fixes a bug in FredoTools::SolidVolume, as signaled by Alex37550. See this post.

                                      See FredoTools plugin home page for Download.

                                      See also main post of this thread for User Discussion.

                                      Fredo

                                      1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                      • R 離線
                                        rv1974
                                        最後由 編輯

                                        MoveAlong question:
                                        How difficult would it be to implement
                                        a Multiple objects move (rotate?) by their local axes?

                                        1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                        • fredo6F 離線
                                          fredo6
                                          最後由 編輯

                                          @rv1974 said:

                                          MoveAlong question:
                                          How difficult would it be to implement
                                          a Multiple objects move (rotate?) by their local axes?

                                          Should be a dedicated tool.

                                          MoveAlong is already complex, and I did not add the move along local axes (there are inferences however), as I did in Animator.

                                          That's not a matter of programming ; Putting too many features in a plugin defeats the purpose, as then it is judged cluttered with options that nobody really uses.

                                          Fredo

                                          1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                          • fredo6F 離線
                                            fredo6
                                            最後由 編輯

                                            NEW RELEASE: FredoTools v3.1c - 18 Aug 17

                                            FredoTools 3.1c fixes problems with non-ascii usernames and provides verious bug fixing.

                                            See FredoTools plugin home page for Download.

                                            See also main post of this thread for User Discussion.

                                            Fredo

                                            1 條回覆 最後回覆 回覆 引用 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 18
                                            • 19
                                            • 20
                                            • 21
                                            • 22
                                            • 23
                                            • 24
                                            • 20 / 24
                                            • 第一個貼文
                                              最後的貼文
                                            Buy SketchPlus
                                            Buy SUbD
                                            Buy WrapR
                                            Buy eBook
                                            Buy Modelur
                                            Buy Vertex Tools
                                            Buy SketchCuisine
                                            Buy FormFonts

                                            Advertisement