• Login
sketchucation logo sketchucation
  • Login
🤑 30% Off | Artisan 2 on sale until April 30th Buy Now

[Plugin] FredoTools - v4.5c - 24 Jun 24

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Plugins
462 Posts 123 Posters 672.7k Views
Loading More Posts
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • V Offline
    vlad_s
    last edited by 6 Mar 2017, 12:37

    Good day, does not work markvertex with fredolib 7.3 and 7.5 in windows xp. In fredolib 6.4 worked.
    Sorry for the English language, computer translation from Russian.


    fredo73a_1.jpg

    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
    • C Offline
      cadmunkey
      last edited by 30 Jun 2017, 14:11

      Hi Fredo, any reason the Sold Volume calculator would report a solid back as a minus figure?
      I took volume calc from my marble model and thought something was strange with the result. So checked individual pieces and some are reporting a minus figure, which of course deducts itself from the final overall result.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D Offline
        Dave R
        last edited by 30 Jun 2017, 14:39

        Cadmunkey, is it possible the faces are reversed on the volume?

        Etaoin Shrdlu

        %

        (THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE)

        G28 X0.0 Y0.0 Z0.0

        M30

        %

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • C Offline
          cadmunkey
          last edited by 30 Jun 2017, 15:02

          @dave r said:

          Cadmunkey, is it possible the faces are reversed on the volume?

          Hi Dave, no I did check for this. I cant see a reason for it at all.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D Offline
            Dave R
            last edited by 30 Jun 2017, 15:55

            How about copying and pasting that volume into a new file and sharing it so we can see it?

            Etaoin Shrdlu

            %

            (THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE)

            G28 X0.0 Y0.0 Z0.0

            M30

            %

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C Offline
              cadmunkey
              last edited by 30 Jun 2017, 17:42

              @dave r said:

              How about copying and pasting that volume into a new file and sharing it so we can see it?

              Dave, happy to send it to you privately for a look? its a 12mb file.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • F Offline
                fredo6
                last edited by 1 Jul 2017, 05:44

                @cadmunkey
                You are right. Actually, the result is correct mathematically. In the algorithm, negative volumes are normally used for holes in solids. But intuitively, we are not used to negative volumes.

                So, I fixed it, and it will go in the next release.

                Fredo

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C Offline
                  cadmunkey
                  last edited by 1 Jul 2017, 12:15

                  @fredo6 said:

                  @cadmunkey
                  You are right. Actually, the result is correct mathematically. In the algorithm, negative volumes are normally used for holes in solids. But intuitively, we are not used to negative volumes.

                  So, I fixed it, and it will go in the next release.

                  Fredo

                  These are not holes in solids, if you want I can email you my model for analysis.
                  Its a marble stone cut list, and some of the stones are reporting back as negative volumes.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • F Offline
                    fredo6
                    last edited by 1 Jul 2017, 19:09

                    I mean that when you flip along a group or component instances, you actually transform their axes and mathematically, this gives a negative volume, as it does for holes in the solid.

                    Anyway, many thanks for signalling the problem.

                    Fredo

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • R Offline
                      rv1974
                      last edited by 1 Jul 2017, 22:12

                      I wish Curvishear could be become way more usable by
                      letting user 'in-vivo' move a vertex (and thus setting desired height and slope direction)


                      Capture.JPG

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • B Offline
                        bharralure
                        last edited by 2 Jul 2017, 17:16

                        Bonjour Dave
                        Je confirme que "Volume Solides" affiche une valeur négative pour toute instance crée en miroir.
                        Ce problème n'est pas spécifique à SU 2017, l'ayant déjà constaté sous SU 2016 et SU 2015.
                        Je joint un Gif crée sous SU 2017.
                        FredoTools_VolumeSolides.gif

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • F Offline
                          fredo6
                          last edited by 9 Jul 2017, 22:51

                          NEW RELEASE: FredoTools v3.1a - 09 Jul 17

                          Requirement: LibFredo6 v7.7a

                          FredoTools 3.1a introduces a new plugin, called DivideEdges. It also supports hi-resolution screens and fixes some bugs.

                          See FredoTools home page for Download.

                          Fredo

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • JClementsJ Offline
                            JClements
                            last edited by 11 Jul 2017, 20:38

                            Divide Edges (DE) is a nice new addition to your toolset. Thank you!

                            Perhaps a version of DE could be adapted to produce dashed lines? When selected only an ODD number of segments would be available, then every-other-segment after the first segment would be deleted or hidden (not sure which would be the best to go). Maybe it could be "parametric" in the sense that the user could restore the original at later time and apply and different number of segments.

                            John | Illustrator | Beaverton, Oregon

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • F Offline
                              fredo6
                              last edited by 11 Jul 2017, 21:21

                              NEW RELEASE: FredoTools v3.1b - 11 Jul 17

                              FredoTools 3.1b fixes a bug in FredoTools::SolidVolume, as signaled by Alex37550. See this post.

                              See FredoTools plugin home page for Download.

                              See also main post of this thread for User Discussion.

                              Fredo

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • R Offline
                                rv1974
                                last edited by 12 Aug 2017, 19:33

                                MoveAlong question:
                                How difficult would it be to implement
                                a Multiple objects move (rotate?) by their local axes?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • F Offline
                                  fredo6
                                  last edited by 12 Aug 2017, 20:34

                                  @rv1974 said:

                                  MoveAlong question:
                                  How difficult would it be to implement
                                  a Multiple objects move (rotate?) by their local axes?

                                  Should be a dedicated tool.

                                  MoveAlong is already complex, and I did not add the move along local axes (there are inferences however), as I did in Animator.

                                  That's not a matter of programming ; Putting too many features in a plugin defeats the purpose, as then it is judged cluttered with options that nobody really uses.

                                  Fredo

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • F Offline
                                    fredo6
                                    last edited by 18 Aug 2017, 19:24

                                    NEW RELEASE: FredoTools v3.1c - 18 Aug 17

                                    FredoTools 3.1c fixes problems with non-ascii usernames and provides verious bug fixing.

                                    See FredoTools plugin home page for Download.

                                    See also main post of this thread for User Discussion.

                                    Fredo

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • F Offline
                                      fredo6
                                      last edited by 28 Sept 2017, 21:03

                                      NEW RELEASE: FredoTools v3.1d - 28 Sep 17

                                      FredoTools 3.1d fixes potential bugsplat in ThruPaint. Thanks to report if you have any.

                                      See FredoTools plugin home page for Download.

                                      See also main post of this thread for User Discussion.

                                      Fredo

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • ecatiE Offline
                                        ecati
                                        last edited by 30 Sept 2017, 10:15

                                        For Msphysics, I used "Convexify" to divide the object shown in the figure into convex pieces, but I did not create the division process. What would be the reason?


                                        1.JPG


                                        1.skp

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • F Offline
                                          fredo6
                                          last edited by 30 Sept 2017, 11:28

                                          @ecati said:

                                          For Msphysics, I used "Convexify" to divide the object shown in the figure into convex pieces, but I did not create the division process. What would be the reason?

                                          I tried, and it's probably too much for the algorithm.
                                          And on a portion of it, the convexification won't give you something 'nice as expected', because the the triangulation makes most individual edges concave, with relatively large angles.

                                          I guess you have to find another way to generate the shape directly into small bits.

                                          Fredo

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 11
                                          • 12
                                          • 13
                                          • 14
                                          • 15
                                          • 23
                                          • 24
                                          • 13 / 24
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          Buy SketchPlus
                                          Buy SUbD
                                          Buy WrapR
                                          Buy eBook
                                          Buy Modelur
                                          Buy Vertex Tools
                                          Buy SketchCuisine
                                          Buy FormFonts

                                          Advertisement