What res do you final at?
-
@pixero said:
I usually render between 3500 to 5500 pixels wide for A3 and A1 prints.
I've found that you can get away with a little lower resolution that 300 dpi for the most part.
200 to 250 dpi is what I aim for to have decent resolution and still be able to deliver on time.
Would you still use such a large resolution for something like a desktop background?
-
@sirricharic said:
Would you still use such a large resolution for something like a desktop background?
for that, just use your monitor resolution (i.e.- monitor is 1920 x 1200.. so is the render)
-
depending on the boss request.. anyway regular full-hd if is intended only for e-mail/web or small details illustration.
but in most case to be printed something between 2000 and 4000. my personal record is 8000 with a pandemonium of light surces, hi-poly cars, 2.5d trees, displaced grass etc.. but rendered by zone render square by square.. so tedious... -
I once rendered at 10,000 pixels wide for a image that was to be used on a large banner at a ribbon cutting. I rendered direct to EXR with no problems at all.
-
i always got some problems when i tryed to render exr.. mostly because of the fu#in' stored maps bug.. and if i run it whith regular "single frame" calculation, it doesn't show any visible memory difference between exr and regular render.. i don't know.. i can't get it..
anyway.. 10000 is "quite huge" congrats! -
The thing I found out recently is that you need EXRPro ($99) installed in Photoshop CS5 or later (64 bit only I think) in order to see all the channels in the EXR. Once you have ProEXR is works like a charm.
Its the only way I render finals now. Incredibly powerful to have 32 bit files using LWF. Sometimes I use it just to get all my channels in one file without having to batch them in.
ProEXR website
http://www.fnordware.com/ProEXR/ -
@valerostudio said:
The thing I found out recently is that you need EXRPro ($99) installed in Photoshop CS5 or later (64 bit only I think) in order to see all the channels in the EXR. Once you have ProEXR is works like a charm.
Its the only way I render finals now. Incredibly powerful to have 32 bit files using LWF. Sometimes I use it just to get all my channels in one file without having to batch them in.
ProEXR website
http://www.fnordware.com/ProEXR/Thanks for the pointer. I never realized PS doesn't read exr layers. Gonna have to give this prog a try.
Andy
Edit: NICE!! Just tried the program - sure does work a treat.
-
It is a game changer for sure.
-
For continuous tone greyscale/color images (with no graphic elements) the human eye cannot perceive differences above roughly 180 ppi (DPI is dots per inch for printing, PPI is pixels per inch and is used for computer resolution -- these are not the same thing and should not be used interchangeably).
300 ppi is a normal recommendation for print destined project (seen close up) however this is only appropriate if there are high contrast elements (read: lineart/text/graphics) -- if we are talking photographic elements (renders) only then 180ppi is the max you need. For projects containing lineart/graphics/text 400 -600 ppi is actually a better target than 300 ppi, which is a sort of a baseline for crappy paper.
Ideally you would set up your print destined files in a page layout software and send to printer as a PDF so the text and graphics would stay vector (and thereby be rasterized at the printers maximum resolution -- typically 1200-2400 ppi) and the bitmap elements (your renders) would not need to be any higher in resolution than is needed (the aforementioned 180ppi).
Best,
Jason. -
Interesting. I should try using 180 instead of 300.
Advertisement