sketchucation logo sketchucation
    • Login
    ℹ️ Licensed Extensions | FredoBatch, ElevationProfile, FredoSketch, LayOps, MatSim and Pic2Shape will require license from Sept 1st More Info

    SketchUp 2016 Wishlist

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved SketchUp Feature Requests
    sketchup
    192 Posts 69 Posters 62.5k Views 69 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • KrisidiousK Offline
      Krisidious
      last edited by

      You just put that code in Text pbscot.

      By: Kristoff Rand
      Home DesignerUnique House Plans

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • L Offline
        Lushi
        last edited by

        The option to move objects without sticking together, as in AutoCAD, where the "Move" tool to differentiate the "stretch", and thus without a little more "groups" that accumulate in our models .

        A "mirror" internal tool in the program, that way it would avoid problems with external tools, and the quality of it would improve, for example, to differentiate a "2d mirror" to "3d mirror", showing in real time where would the reflected object, the option of inverted symmetry (rotating on two axes), or copied to a "group" to prevent sticking.
         
        the possibility to enable or disable the snap, in ALL the tools

        angular Dimensions

        A "splice" internal tool

        A soft line to create surfaces, but it does not hide

        a 'ellipse' internal tool (also arcs of ellipse)

        divide the screen into four: Top, front, right, projection (default)

        Tool "Clone" in matrix, row, rotate, And scale

        A "Align" internal tool

        Export a blueprint of the current view to a 2d dwg file with Their model layers

        View from below

        That the sun is visible in the sky, giving us a better idea of ​​where he is located

        Improve the follow me tool

        uv mapping

        Button groups such as layout or bar "first steps"

        Layout attached to sketchup (no sense having them in separate programs)

        Launcher with recent files, templates, recovered files, and models uploaded by the community

        Inscribed and circumscribed polygons

        Groups of scenes to higher order and open them to more easily

        improve tool "freehand" to deactivate the snap and lock to a 2D plane

        achieve world peace

        Reliving the dinosaurs

        Get me a cup of tea

        We could start there 😉

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • JQLJ Offline
          JQL
          last edited by

          @rich o brien said:

          or at least offload that presentational aspect to StyleBuilder.

          Which is still the same since its inception.

          Though I wouldn't like that, I understand it would be a good feature.

          You can do that already if you simply Xref your model to a new file and manage styles there.

          BTW Style builder would only be nice if shadows and face colors boundary lines would also twist and bend or if, those areas of color could also have a texture with multiple sizes as lines do right now.

          www.casca.pt
          Visit us on facebook!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JQLJ Offline
            JQL
            last edited by

            @krisidious said:

            Yes... I would love Layout to have Ruby. Never understood why Layout was such a separate program and had no developer support. We had all the drawing and text tools in SU. I always wondered why Layout wasn't actual inside of or part of SU.

            The idea of having more computational efforts on SU for such heavy tasks such as layout's is not easy on me.

            Besides that I like the fact that:

            • You can insert multiple SU files in LO;
            • You can work on a 2D workflow;
            • You have very high graphical output and, nowadays you go towards making a SU model only model, with all dims, texts, and leaders inside LO.
            • PDF export is beautiful

            I don't like the fact that:

            • All commands are different in LO than they are from SU (we are so used to SU why reinvent the wheel in LO?);
            • Selecting has no CTRL or CTRL+SHIFT modifier keys;
            • Drawing commands are less effective;
            • Lines don't break nor faces get generated, nor can we paint a shape like in SU wich is much better than filling and stroking stuff;
            • No components, only groups;
            • Layers are confusing to work with. In SU you CAN'T change active layer, In Layout you MUST change active layer... awkward and opposite workflows.
            • Drag methodology for moving stuff around is awfull. Move should be "M" or Icon.;
            • Drag+CTRL for copying is terrible;
            • Double click for editing viewports is Dangerous as double clicking is also used to edit objects wich are always on top of viewports...
            • Scale? SU is better;
            • Rotate? SU is better;
            • Inference? SU is WAY better;
            • That dongle for inference, scale and rotate... OMG...
            • Offset tool... where is it?
            • Guide Lines?
            • Ruby?
            • DWG export is flawed;
            • Auto text is good but limited;
            • Auto tags are good but VERY limited.

            I still love Layout and because of it I ditched CAD... so why am I complaining? Because I work with it a lot!

            www.casca.pt
            Visit us on facebook!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • KrisidiousK Offline
              Krisidious
              last edited by

              agreeeeed.

              By: Kristoff Rand
              Home DesignerUnique House Plans

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • FrederikF Offline
                Frederik
                last edited by

                @jql said:

                I don't like the fact that:

                • All commands are different in LO than they are from SU (we are so used to SU why reinvent the wheel in LO?)

                I agree 110%...
                The commands should be the same...

                All in all that's a really great list, Joao...! 👍

                Cheers
                Kim Frederik

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • highlanderH Offline
                  highlander
                  last edited by

                  Material menu:
                  -when right click on material it's taking so long for the pop-up to show (with lot of materials)
                  -maybe a button for save/export the material to skm??
                  -edit function can be a lot better, CMYK, bigger color wheel, maybe layer system with multiple textures

                  just a tought

                  sander

                  Sander Hoogland
                  SketchUp 2018 pro - Vray
                  Beeld3d

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • oceanembersO Offline
                    oceanembers
                    last edited by

                    @lushi said:

                    The option to move objects without sticking together, as in AutoCAD, where the "Move" tool to differentiate the "stretch", and thus without a little more "groups" that accumulate in our models .

                    But Sketchup is not Autocad, and besides, the way the move tool functions can actually be used very effectively in the modeling process. Groups and components are there to allow exactly the kind of movement you are talking about.

                    I do think, however, that entering and exiting of groups and components could be much more streamlined.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • HieruH Offline
                      Hieru
                      last edited by

                      How about the ability to toggle camera clipping off and on?

                      www.davidhier.co.uk

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • kenK Offline
                        ken
                        last edited by

                        What I would like to see are more native tools.

                        Such as:

                        1. Rotated Box
                        2. 3 Point Circle and 2 point circle
                        3. Rotated Circle/Cyclinder
                        4. More guide lines tools
                        5. Entity Info, be able to change the volume to another attribute, such as, weight, i.e (Steel/lbs), (Alum/lbs) etc.

                        They did a great job with the rotated rectangle.

                        Ken

                        Fight like your the third monkey on Noah's Ark gangway.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • jeff hammondJ Offline
                          jeff hammond
                          last edited by

                          @lushi said:

                          The option to move objects without sticking together, as in AutoCAD, where the "Move" tool to differentiate the "stretch", and thus without a little more "groups" that accumulate in our models .

                          that's a key difference between sketchup and other cad applications.

                          in rhino, if you draw a line on top of another line, you'll have 2 lines.
                          in sketchup, if you do the same thing, you'll have 1 line.

                          both have advantages and i can't really say one way is better than the other.. you just have to have a slightly different mindset/approach in each program.

                          i'm willing to bet this difference will remain for the life of the software(s).


                          @unknownuser said:

                          1. 3 Point Circle and 2 point circle

                          i'd be curious to see how a 3pt circle would be implemented in sketchup..

                          ultimately, if you're drawing a (segmented) circle using 3 points, you'd expect each point to coincide with a vertex on the circle.. but in most instances, at least one of the vertices of the circle won't fall on one of the points (unless the circle were divided into 3 separate arc segments each with a different number of segments)..

                          anyway, it could get confusing i imagine.

                          dotdotdot

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • LOAML Offline
                            LOAM
                            last edited by

                            I would like them to resolve the clipping of objects that aren't close to the origin, I hate having to reduce the FOV to 1 to see what I am doing 😞

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • kenK Offline
                              ken
                              last edited by

                              Jeff wrote:

                              "Ken wrote:
                              2. 3 Point Circle and 2 point circle

                              i'd be curious to see how a 3pt circle would be implemented in sketchup..

                              ultimately, if you're drawing a (segmented) circle using 3 points, you'd expect each point to coincide with a vertex on the circle.. but in most instances, at least one of the vertices of the circle won't fall on one of the points (unless the circle were divided into 3 separate arc segments each with a different number of segments)..

                              anyway, it could get confusing i imagine."

                              I have a plugin that does draw a 3 point circle. I use it on Images and CAD files. As shown, here is a rectangle 10' by 20'. I made the 3 point selections, and presto I have a 6 segment circle, (normally this would be a 72 segment circle, or a segment per 5 degrees. The radius is equal distance from each of the 3 points. I don't expect each vertex to fall on the circle since circle are made from line segments. However, I expect to have the circle radius to be corrects, as shown in the illustration.

                              The math, each two points selection define a line that is cord of the circle. A line perpendicular and at the center of each of the two cords, interset at the circle's center. So from this intersection to any of the vertex, is the circle radius.

                              Works great, just think something this simple should be a native tools.

                              Guess I am wishing more since I saw how the rotated rectangle was implemented.

                              Ken


                              3 Point Circle.png

                              Fight like your the third monkey on Noah's Ark gangway.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • H Offline
                                hkla
                                last edited by

                                Decrease the minimum on Network licensing.

                                How low? 2 would be nice. I have 6 potential users, who may jump between 7 computers depending on the task (one computer is a render or complex model computer for all to use). However, each user only uses the program in sparse bursts, only up to 3 at once, but I'm not allowed to have a network because 50 seats in a small office is insane. This becomes very annoying.

                                I will gladly pay more per seat to unlock network licensing.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • jeff hammondJ Offline
                                  jeff hammond
                                  last edited by

                                  @unknownuser said:

                                  I don't expect each vertex to fall on the circle since circle

                                  well that's the difference with you and I then.

                                  personally, I expect a vertex to fall on the point I used to define the circle.. in the same way if you draw a circle by clicking the center point then radius (like the current circle tool).. the vertex coincides with the point being used to define the radius.

                                  if you don't expect that to happen then I guess that's fine too.

                                  dotdotdot

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • BepB Offline
                                    Bep
                                    last edited by

                                    Support of Linux

                                    "History is written by the winners"

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • KrisidiousK Offline
                                      Krisidious
                                      last edited by

                                      Looks like we can remove trays that move between program starts. mine would pile up in older versions when I restarted. Now they are exactly where I left them.

                                      By: Kristoff Rand
                                      Home DesignerUnique House Plans

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • jeff hammondJ Offline
                                        jeff hammond
                                        last edited by

                                        @jeff hammond said:

                                        @unknownuser said:

                                        1. 3 Point Circle and 2 point circle

                                        ultimately, if you're drawing a (segmented) circle using 3 points, you'd expect each point to coincide with a vertex on the circle.. but in most instances, at least one of the vertices of the circle won't fall on one of the points (unless the circle were divided into 3 separate arc segments each with a different number of segments)..

                                        not sure how i missed this before but... the new 3pt arc tool actually does what i was thinking it should do.. all three points will coincide with a vertex on the arc then the segment lengths are figured out accordingly (and automatically)

                                        smart programming 👍

                                        3ptarc.jpg

                                        dotdotdot

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • A Offline
                                          AirWindSolar
                                          last edited by

                                          How about not assuming all users are brain damaged? The "By adding a location..." monologue is annoying enough once, but popping it up every time is wasting time and effectively telling the user you don't think they're bright enough to remember what this option did the last thousand times.

                                          Or be consistent and have every tool pop up a similar window:

                                          • Pencil: By drawing a line...
                                          • Eraser: By erasing objects...
                                          • Paint bucket: By adding materials...
                                          • Etc.
                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • A Offline
                                            ArtPen
                                            last edited by

                                            After SketchUp 2015 release, I want to take a moment to say “BIG” thanks for x64 support to a SketchUp Team.
                                            For SketchUp 2015 I did a long list, for SketchUp 2016 I think it is better to keep the program simple but provide a good core functionality and features.
                                            So I reduced my wish list to a minimum… well almost )

                                            GENERAL IMPROVEMENTS / FEATURES

                                            1. TeamWork / Xref - is essential for any office based work
                                              I know there is an option to use components, but common it is not really useable for commercial projects with team of 10 people. Or it is not flexible.
                                            2. Basic building elements - (Walls, Slabs, Curtain Walls, Roofs, Windows/Doors) with use of Dynamic Components, so user can edit individual elements and create custom elements.
                                            3. Faster Nicer Viewport - nicer texture representation, nicer anti-aliasing, soft shadows, smooth navigation, better fog and light. So there is no almost no need for external renderer
                                            4. Components to cut through walls / two faces - for creating windows and doors
                                            5. Real indestructible curves - even if curve was exploded you still have an option to find tangents or centre

                                            OSX

                                            Please give some love to a OSX version of SketchUP.

                                            1. Material List
                                            2. Better UI - Please update the UI to fit Apple UI guidelines (Flat design)
                                              Take a look at Pixelmator - the team make a great job
                                            3. Full Screen - Why it is still not here? Even Blender has it.
                                            4. Total area of material in Material Browser - Like in Windows

                                            WILL BE GOOD TO HAVE

                                            1. Line Types - like you have in Layout, All Layout library to SketchUp (Lines, Fills, Scrapbook)
                                            2. Layout and SketchUp Layers Sync - or option to export DWG from Layout with SketchUp layers.
                                            3. Faster Nicer Viewport - nicer texture representation, nicer anti-aliasing, soft shadows, smooth navigation, better fog and light. So there is no almost no need for external renderer

                                            Cheers,

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 9
                                            • 10
                                            • 2 / 10
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Buy SketchPlus
                                            Buy SUbD
                                            Buy WrapR
                                            Buy eBook
                                            Buy Modelur
                                            Buy Vertex Tools
                                            Buy SketchCuisine
                                            Buy FormFonts

                                            Advertisement