PEBKAC (Problem Exists Between the Keyboard And Chair)

Jean, that's pretty cool. I'm going to try that with my 7 year old son.

The best malware protection software is YOU http://theoldergeek.com/troubleshooting/security-issues/how-to-avoid-computer-viruses-and-phishing-hacks

You re so right Jeff! I'm going to lock up all the large plates (12") and only have the smaller ones (8") in the kitchen.

@alan fraser said: Nice...but they should have included the guy at the entrance shouting "No fotografia!" every ten seconds. ... and from my visit - the overwhelming memory of the loud 'Shhhhhhhhhhhhhh!' from the guards every few seconds when the Japanese tourists kept chatting irreverently

@ 'Alan F.' The Bible is not a sophisticated book (as mistakenly believe those who wrote that article)..., but a popular one..., and those who go on the “way of holiness”, no matter how simple they are, they will not astray! See, for example the words from Isaiah 35:8: “Whoever walks the road (re. the Highway of Holiness), although a fool, shall not go astray.” (NKJV version), or “Whoso is going in the way (the `way of holiness') - even fools err not.” (YLT version) In that article are forced some explanation, which, if we take them as good, they come in conflict with other issues. And then, do not mix the data refers only to the “church”, with data refers only to Jew people or to Gentiles ...!

I remember a deferent image though. [image: nCnK_Screenshot2012-01-10at12.42.03AM.jpg]

Existing now as archive Just click on it! Not sure that the sound level of the English is sufficient for no French Speaker ?

'Marian' wrote: “[I guess all atheists are scientific atheists. I don't think there is the need for a distinction. I doubt many atheists will say, that they feel there is no god or say that because of their close personal relation with the univers they know that god doesn't exist.]” ‘Marian’, you have too many GAPS ...! The ‘cruel’ TRUTH is this: Most famous scientists WERE true Christians!!!

Cornel you've made around four posts today quoting or paraphrasing scripture. I'm with Alan on this one. Debate the issue, leave the preaching out of it. Yours isn't the only religion here, but you're the only one saying yours is right.

Some miss information floating around: Windows memory manager controls the access to physical memory via working sets, most programs cannot touch physical memory, and in fact virtual memory can be larger that 4GB; By setting the 3GB switch in the boot ini file for certain configurations of your system then SU can have 3GB of memory( Less what some device drivers use.) vs the normal two while the kernel gets reduced to 1 GB. I was able to open an ~350MB SU file ( Window Xp sp3, 4GB Ram) using this approach. Does not mean speed was great. For the 64 bit systems SU is still limited to the 4GB Address space because it runs as a 32 bit app. However the operating system can remap memory to use RAM greater than 4GB so the app. can have the total 4GB. Your BIOS needs to be set correctly to max use of your 64 system. Make sure to read the manual. For those interested read these articles http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2008/11/17/3155406.aspx and http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2008/07/21/3092070.aspx

@massimo said: Wonder why hijacking this topic with the same question you have asked two times on KT forum having already received an answer there... i am sorry, i didn't know that. i just turned on my pc. and head straight to this forum. [ed] wow.. thank you masimo for the reply and link there. i love you so muuuuccccchhhh...

loads lightning fast for me Thom.

I'd have thought that Apple was on very sticky ground with that...assuming that there's nothing overtly appley about the doll. All dolls probably look like somebody. I've seen plenty of other people's kids that look like they were born in a cabbage patch...and I bear a striking resemblance to Ken....as does my wife to Barbie.

@escapeartist said: Nope, haven't seen it. Guess I'm gonna have to! [image: shocked.jpg]

Those are nice.

Hi folks. I bought one of those in 1978. [image: sliu_AppleII.jpg] It was one of the first made since one PROM chip inside was in white plastic with a serial number (#187) written on it. Too bad it was stolen in 1983. It was replaced by an Apple //e that I still have in a box. The original Apple II will be 35 years old this year. Just ideas.

lol. Reminds me of this: http://dontevenreply.com/index.php

That's a gift for the new year, yes? Thank you so much, a happy new year to all. Awesome.

...Happy New Year !