HP DV9000 should have an AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60 (?)
http://www.notebookcheck.net/AMD-Turion-64-X2-TL-60-Notebook-Processor.39265.0.html
http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Core-i7-3630QM-Notebook-Processor.80051.0.html
So comparing the cinebench R10 results it sould be around ~6 times faster
X2 TL-60 = 3130
3630QM = 21699.4
http://www.notebookcheck.net/Mobile-Processors-Benchmarklist.2436.0.html
@vigge50 said:
[img]bild%20(2).JPG[/img]
it stay that it´s on 800MHz instead of 1600, any ide why?
ahh, ok... this is the normal setting for 1600MHz. DDR stands for Double Data Rate, so 800MHZ = 1600MHZ, as displayed in your screenshot. 
...but cl 11 is a bit slow. cl 10 should be possible or is this the normal spec for 1600 for this RAM?
@wyatt said:
I'll check the cost to step up to an i7 ...
Just to be clear... the i7 and Xeon E3 (for single CPU systems) are basically the same for each generation (Xeon has some more features like ECC, but they are not needed. And you get them without the internal graphics). So there is no need to switch to i7 now, if they offer you a faster Xeon. Maybe they are only selling Xeons in this product line...
@vigge50 said:
When I look in the bios, it stands that the ram is 800 MHz but it is 1600 MHz so what could be wrong, could I overclock it?
What have you set? "Auto"? Try "XMP" or set it manually.
Or you can look if there is a newer BIOS version available and see if this fixes the RAM detection.
ahh, ok... i thought there is a special second option for thumbnails for the file icon...
but thanks, i will try this.
@unknownuser said:
Once the "create thumbnail on save" is disabled you will most certainly experience a marked improvement in "save time".
So... where can i disable the thumbnails?!? i can't find any option for this.
btw.nice speed improvement...
I think for Sketchup and CAD a FirePro should be working good - theoretically, since Sketchup is still using openGL and there the workstation cards should perform good.
But for Adobe stuff an nvidia card maybe would perform better. But i would take one with at least 2GB RAM. And the V3900 is based on the same chip like the Radeon HD 6570/6670 which is more a lower midrange card and already 2.5 years old...
If you're not using any render engine then i would choose a higher clocked quadcore i7 or Xeon. I would go for the new Haswell based CPUs (i7 4xxx/ Xeon E3 V3) if you can wait a few weeks/months (release should be June/July) or take an Ivy Bridge i7 or Xeon now, but with a clockspeed around 3.5GHz (3.9 GHz Turbo).
maybe one of these:
http://ark.intel.com/products/65727
http://ark.intel.com/products/65725
http://ark.intel.com/products/65523
http://ark.intel.com/products/65719
http://ark.intel.com/products/65520
http://ark.intel.com/products/65702
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivy_Bridge_(microarchitecture
And better take 2x8GB RAM so that you can add another 2 Sticks to upgrade to 32GB later (or buy 32GB now if you need it - but maybe not from HP... RAM upgrades are normally highly overpriced at Apple/DELL/HP)
HP Z220 SFF 240W must be a typo... or it is just enough for this system with this low power CPU and GPU. Normally you should buy at least 400-500W to have a bit of headroom for a bigger video card. And the efficiency is normally the best at ~60% load.
And you should definitely buy a SSD for windows/programs...
@vigge50 said:
The big problem is that I choose wrong chassi, there the air could go in is to small and when you have a fan in the front it nearly block all. At the back of the front fan there is blockt by the harddrivs bay I am going to set a fan at the tree 5.25 bays that I don't use so I can get in air from there. The little problem with that is that I was stupid to not take a modular PSU so I have to think over how I should fix that.
Here is some picture of how it's look now
i know...
http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=179&t=49270&start=60#p455208
I would not move the front fan up - this will reduce the airflow for the video card...
Did you test it with an open case? If the case is the problem, then this should be much better .
As i said befor, would change the case if you're so limited with it...
Nice to hear that you could fix it. So, was it a damaged board?
63°C sounds pretty high for stock clockspeeds...
When you say "full load", do you mean rendering, or something like prime or intel burn test ?
Using a True Spirit 140? Fan speed?
Judging from the test results of this cooler you should be able to keep it in the mid 50's i think... maybe there is something wrong with your setup.
i think without sorting all these resuls in different charts per display size this thread is pretty useless. The way it works now the only results that help are if someone tests two different CPUs or GPUs in the same machine. Or if a configuration matches your own with different clock rates...
noch zur Ergänzung...
Grundsätzlich hast Du 3 Möglichkeiten, Verschneiden anzuwenden:
Und zur Flächenorientierung...
Man sollte schon darauf achten, wie die Flächen orientiert sind. Beim Rendern sowieso, wie Cotty sagt, aber auch beim Modellieren kann es sonst zu Problemen kommen (zB. mit Joint Push Pull)
Ich arbeite daher normalerweise mit Vorderseite weiß und Rückseite Neongrün... da sieht man auch im unübersichtlichsten Model noch, wenn eine Fläche verdreht ist. 
Außerdem hab ich die Funktion "Fläche umkehren" als Shortcut "^" auf der Tastatur. Da ist eine korrekte Aufrichtung nur einen Fingerzucken entfernt...
Also ich würde es mit curviloft machen ( http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=323&t=28586 )
Das Verschneiden mit der Öffnung sollte ja klar sein...
Um die Verschneidung sauber mit Quads zu lösen könnte man auch sie Teilung der Seiten und des Bogens noch erhöhen und dann die entsprechenden Punkte in der Fläche nach der Verschneidung auf die Ecken ziehen.
Kanten abrunden sollte dann auch funktionieren.
@n lindenthal said:
Hui, so etwas geht mit SU? (!)
War das jetzt ein Witz?
Das ist ja nun doch eher simplere Geometrie... da gehen noch ganz andere Sachen (oft natürlich nur mit den entsprechenden Plugins)
intensity too low? Maybe try with multilight.
Did you try bouth face orientations? Some time ago a had the problem that emitter faces got reversed on export.
@escapeartist said:
...2000/ME, junk! ...
ME was junk, 2000 was great! (at its time) I had it for several years after NT4.
@solo said:
I have been assured that every overclocking is stressed tested for 36 hours to make sure the system is 100% stable and the company does not overclock above 4.2Ghz as they know we run our rigs for long periods and they want us to have a stable problem free rig and I agree, I will have mine clocked to 4.2Ghz by the way.
I think all they will do then is to set the auto overclocking to 4,2... which will be stable for all "stress testing" (which is a very unprecise definition btw.) And i think 4,2GHz should be possible with almost every 3930K without problems. That would take you or them only 3 seconds to do, BUT will normally result in higher voltages than needed and can in the case of Sandy Bridge E degrade the CPU in some cases if the VCCSA and VTT voltage is set too high. ( http://rog.asus.com/forum/showthread.php?19926-3930K-C2-Degradation )
I don't want to spoil the party - only to point out that "overclocking" can be done in several ways...
Have you tried ThruPaint?
http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=323&t=44552
or as unwrapping solution a commercial plugin: SketchUV
http://sketchucation.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=323&t=44501
I use ThruPaint and it works great for me. But all faces have to be quads for some tools.
And you should enable "Ignore Distortion" For groups/components who contain ThruPaint mapping otherwise the maxwell plugin will export one per quad face!
The cameras of the two scenes have different exposure values (EV)...
Maybe you should first learn the basics of maxwell and photography
http://support.nextlimit.com/display/maxwelldocs/Camera+parameters
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exposure_value
I wish for the option to switch of the rotate handles on groups/components...
I NEVER use them, but they're VERY annoying if you try to select some points who are close to them... 
I think ultradns.net is only the DNS-server.
The owner of the site should be OLX in New York
Did you try to contact them?
http://ciudaddemexico.olx.com.mx/contacts.php
http://www.olx.com/contacts.php
I don't know how this works with mexico and copyright ingringements, but since they seem to be located in the US...
But concerning your ranking. I think you're at this place because of the image names and your page rank at google search. If i search for "koi pond deck" in the normal google search your page is on top.
http://whois.gwebtools.de/woodsshop.com
So i would say you can manipulate the images and keep the names and it should work, but no guaranty!
Maybe you should ask a professional webdesigner and a lawyer for more information...